LABOR FOCUS Murray strives to split ClO RESIDENT Philip Murray is prepared to split the} CIO wide open over the issue of support for the; North Atlantic pact and the Marshall plan. This became. clear during the recent CIO executive board meeting! when: Murray ordered the left-wing minority either. to; By MARY DOBBS. By TIM BUCK THE NATION 1945 ed, hon Promises, through, ' however, hat about the Liberals A TYPICAL example of how cheaply Liberal provid nd Tory politicians hold election promises is ided by the present new stage of acuteness of the using crisis and the unscrupulous manner in which the pe aeciiins who are directly responsible for the crisis are ‘wefan to make political capital out of it. : With the lifting of controls the housing crisis has got : than ever. ‘Thousands of families are being evict- fore pelle. with little children. and babies are being and a: live by the roadside with their furniture piled friincal them. Not all of them can even get tents. The the sas reason for this worsening of the situation is that tended eral government removed those controls which 7 ¢ to freeze the situation with regard to occupancy aving carried out its promise to provide more Seas hus the present situation completes a cycle from . ton promise through veiled repudiation to new elec- Wors rae 1945 the Liberals promised officially that, if be ed to office, they would initiate a 10-year housing pm me. The White Paper on National Income and Ployment published shortly before the last election Progr a big point of its promise of a large housing be te as part of what was then presented to the ble as a plan the government was pledged to carry eee the election campaign the King government iatel 2 public pledge that if re-elected it would immed- build oustruct 50,000 homes for veterans and would hs 100, UO homes per year each year during the 10 ‘@ > following the election. “Neither of those promises were kept and no attempt - as mad t © to introduce even a more limited scheme. It js Tue that : the Liberals had a very useful excuse in that By J. B. SALSBERG promise on health, housing? George Drew and Maurice Duplessis stymied Macken- zie King’s plan for Dominion-Provincial agreements. - It would be wrong to minimize the importance of their opposition because if the provincial governments of On- tario and, Quebec had entered into agreements Mac- kenzie. King would have had no excuse whatever for not living up to all the promises he had made—including his promise of a national health and hospitalization scheme. The point is that no attempt was made to live up to Mackenzie King’s, promises even on a basis adjusted to the fact that Ontario and Quebec were refusing to cooperate. : : : Instead of honoring the election promises Louis St. Laurent, literally reversed the government’s attitude by making a public statement that no government of which he is part would ever subsidize housing. That, indeed, did express the attitude and policy of the government. If his public statement did make any change it was but to make it official. Now, with the crisis worsening and thousands of families being rendered desperate, Liberal candidates are looking up the election speeches by cabinet members in 1945 and repeating their promises. Louis St. Laurent, who repudiated the idea of the state subsidizing homes only a short time back is now hinting at homes, social security measures, health, and even state expenditures to maintain “the home market.” Not to be outdone, that Baron Munchausen of Canadian politics, Colonel Drew, is trying to out-promise the man who studied under Mackenzie King. Neither of them will keep, or intend keeping, such promises. Al] the things they promise are possible but they can be achieved’ only by a united working class effort against the interests that Drew and St. Laurent jointly represent. \lertness needed to fight speedup which threatens health, jobs Tt ex strike of Ford workers at Detroit and the ; ae of spontaneous stoppages in scores of major ace met Plants, focuses attention on the growing men- Be. the health-destroying, nerve-wracking speedup Which large-scale, modern industry is conducting. Cases . Speedup is also with us in Canada, and in some Sistang € tempo here is even higher. Unfortunately, re- Profit ity this heartless method of extracting greater ing Se the expense of the physical and mental well- ed wo Workers is not yet being fought by the organ- the ee and it is high time that the struggle against Sp UP was launched. ares : hey, re edup aS a means of increasing profits is nothing 'S as old as the modern industrial system. It has, become a refined art, particularly in the U.S. anada Speer? the beet metsh ome ‘the most notorious on this continent, The B. Yailrg 4 baltimore and Ohio) system was the plague of and railroad shop workers on the continent € twenties. There were, of course, myriads Mostest Systems” which industry employed to get “the St for the littlest,” Tight. the eternal shame of the class-collaborating, Doteg | "€ bureaucracy of the trade unions, it must be hat they turned their union apparatus into aux- Machinery for the introduction of the various 4P systems in their respective industries. Invari- Claim Ot: Course, these ignorant, or cynical, jobholders Method that the application of “improved production in ey, S Would mean more jobs and higher pay. ‘But o “rY single case the opposite proved to be the result. First World War special “schools” of ean : ginnin the twenties, scores of left-wing union men, be- expen, With Tim Buck, were hounded, suspended and Bowe trom tet unions because of the fight they led introauet® Policies of collaborating with industry to © speedu’ ; Today, te P methods © speeding-up of workers in Canada is gain- ods came into being, the Bedeau system | ing an alarming tempo. The ill effects of it are seen on all sides. In this regard it is interesting to quote Donald Gordon, deputy governor of the Bank of Canada and head of Wartime Price Controls. On May 7 he said: “As nearly as we can make out. our total output of goods and services was about 75 percent greater in physical volume in 1948 than it was ten years before. This figure is subject to many qualifications, but I am sure it gives the right order of magnitude. » To achieve 75 percent more production with 40 per- cent more workers is, I think, better than most of us would have expected... .” This means that within a period of ten years the net increase of production per worker was 25 percent! And this was only in 1948. It is common knowledge that the real “scientific” drive to step up production was launched in 1949. In the Windsor Chrysler plant, spontaneous action against speedup was taken a few weeks ago. Similar rank and file action against an impossible speedup of production took place in the Oshawa General Motors plant. In the Hamilton-Steleo plant a vicious process of re-grading workers is now being executed at the expense of older men. In the Porcupine gold mine fields wholesale dis- missals of old-time miners commenced a few weeks ago. The same procedure is in operation in the lumber camps and in practically all branches of industry. Now is the time for the Canadian trade union move- ment to put a halt to this most vicious system of ex- ploitation. Already there is shocking evidence of tendencies among many trade union jobholders to go along with the speeding-up methods, It is the rank and file, there- fore, that must take the initiative and force through a militant policy against it. It is a battle that starts at the work bench, at thé conveyer belt’ and at the lathe. It is a job for shop stewards, shop committees and local union executives. This is the only way the new menace of speedup will be defeated. > join the national CIO in its slavish adherence to U.S. state department policy or get out. The board meeting, which brought together in Wash- ' ington some 52 leaders of all the CIO affiliates, empha- sized the extent to which the right-wing majority: in - CIO has abandoned all pretensions of trade union leader- ship and has become unquestioning servants of the Tru- man administration. At a time when five million workers are out of jobs. and signs ef an economic crisis are accumulat- ing at an alarming rate, the leaders of 64 million American workers devoted only a few hours cut of a 3-day conference to e*onomic issues, and passed merely token resolutions on wages and unemploy- ment. The rest of the time was dedicated to a red- baiting assault on the left-wing unions. The attack was led by Murray who, ironically enough, rose te leadership with the support of the left. The unions un- der left leadership, which hold about one-fourth of - the cIo membership, came to thé board meeting with par- ticularly bitter proof of the degen- eracy of current CIO policy. Maur. ice Travis, @ na- tional leader of the left-wing Interna tional Union of Mine, Mill and Smelter Workers, had just been at- tacked and blinded in one eye by a gang ‘which included rep. resentatives of Mur- be ce Steelworkers’ goons did this to Mine-Mill’s Maurice Travis, who "@YS own union, last week had his right éye re- the United Stee]- workers, and na: moved. Murray dismissed the attack as a “minor incident,” de- nied Travis got more than a “black eye.” tional C10, The at- tack was the climax of a raid by the Steelworkers on a Mine-Mill local at Bessemer, Alabama. The. Mine-Mill union charged that the raid was accompanied by open terror, collusion with the company and use of the Ku Klux Klan to frighten Negro workers, Despite the overwhelming evidence of the steel union’s shameful role in’ this affair, the CIO ex- ecutive board passed a resolution taking away the Mine-Mill union’s jurisdiction over the Bessemer workers, and condemned the left-wing union for daring to protest what had happened. ‘Similarly, Murray directed a stream of complaints against President Harry Bridges of the International Longshoremen’s and Warehousemen’s Union for pointing out that the CIO had virtually betrayed labor’s campaign to repeal the Taft-Hartley law and restore the Wagner act. Another left-wing union, the United Farm Equip- ment and Metal Workers,’ which has been successfully fending off raids by the United Auto Workers, was or- dered to surrender its membership to the auto union by the October CIO convention or face expulsion. Making its reactionary circuit complete, the board formally approved CIO Secretary-Treasurer James B, Carey’s single-handed removal of the CIO from the World Federation of Trade Unions, and warned that any CIO affiliate would be vidlating CIO policy if it main- tained any ties with the WFTU. It also approved the North Atlantic pact, to which Murray had previously committed the CFO, and issued a direct appeal] to the members of left-wing unions to oust their leaders. Murray was obviously hoping to provoke the left wing into walking out of the CIO, since he cannot expel these unions without a two-thirds vote of a CIO convention. The position of the left-wing unions. however, is that they will remain in the CIO as long as possible, and at the same time fight aggressively for their democratic right to maintain independent political positions. ; ; Just how far the CIO has travelled from its demo- cratic inceptions was shown in the joyful reaction to the proceedings by AFL leaders, who were meeting at the same time in another city. Born in revolt against the AFL class collaborationists, the CIO is now thor. oughly acceptable to the AFI, Its president, William, Green, declared there were no longer any political ob- stacles to reunification with the CIO, and as the first step he announced that the AFL would join with the CIO in forming a new anti-communist “world” labor body to fight the WFTU. : PACIFIC TRIBUNE — MAY 27, 1949 — PAGE 9 FY ; 4 i t 1 ; j i ‘ i