PAULING HITS U.S. ACTION Candidates must take Stand on Vietnam war’ About 2,500 people were present in Vancouver's Exhibition Gardens last Friday night to attend the largest public rally to be held in B.C. since the federal election campaign began, to hear Nobel Prize winner Dr. Linus Pauling and Dr. R. Wright of the B.C. Research Council urge Canadians to make candidates declare where they stand on peace in Vietnam. Declaring that he was “horri- fied” at the atrocities committed by the U,S, and “ashamed” of the role played by the U.S, in Viet- nam and other countries, Dr, Pauling said the U.S, is engaged in an “immoral” war in Vietnam and that in bombing North Viet- nam it was guilty of “unpro- voked aggression,” Charging that the U.S, was using horror weapons ofall kinds, Dr. Pauling saidthe U.S, military look on Vietnam as a‘‘war labor- atory” and he compared their actions to that of fascist Ger- many in Spain, He condemned the use of poison gas and said that so-called non-lethal gases are more lethal than the poison gases used in World War 1, In “right” concentrations, he said, “they might not kill but used in enclosed areas, against women, children, aged and sick, they could be very lethal, Lashing out at President John- son — who he described as a Republican when the people thought they were voting for a Democrat — Dr, Pauling said the war in Vietnam violated the U.S, constitution. Under Article 8 the U.S, Congress has power to de- clare war, But because of John- son’s trickery, Congress has been prevented from debating and deciding while a full-blown in- volvement by the U.S, in a war in South East Asia is underway. He said that the President had laid himself open to possible impeachment because of his vio- lation of the U.S. Constitution, Later that evening he told an Dr. Linus Pauling addressing the PNE Gardens rally last Friday. audience at the UBC Teach-in that he would sign sucha petition. Dr, Pauling said the U.S, was waging the war in Vietnam be- cause it refused to allow the Vietnamese people the govern- ment of their choice. Recalling how the U.S. had violated the Geneva agreement of 1954andits decision that an election be held in 1956, Dr, Pauling saidthe U.S, doesn’t want self-determination for the countries of South East Asia. Refuting the stand of Presi- dent Johnson and other top U,S, officials that “the enemy is pre- venting the war from coming to an end,” Dr, Pauling said that the refusal of the U.S, to include the National Liberation Front of ‘South Vietnam in negotiations is the main stumbling block to a ceasefire, Dr, Pauling recalled that he and seven other holders of Nobel - Peace prizes had written world leaders calling for an immediate ceasefire and negotiations to end the war, In the letter it was_ proposed that all governments and parties concerned be in- cluded in negotiations, Dr. Paul- ing said the U.S, reply made it clear that they were not willing to negotiate with the National Liberation Front, He told his audience that Prime Minister Pearson was one of two Nobel Prize winners who refused to sign the letter, He charged that the U.S, is BOB PRITTIE New Democrats demand U.S.|| recall troops from Vietnam |: Bob Prittie, NDP candidate in Burnaby-Richmond, told the teach-in at UBC last weekend that an NDP government would: demand the withdrawal of U troops from Vietnam, statement was greeted wi loud cheers, NDP candidate Tom Barnett, Comox-Alberml, condemned U.S, policy in Viet” nam at a meeting in Cumber land, : Earlier, students grill ; Liberal candidate for Vancou- ver-Kingsway, Jack Austin, over Prime Minister Peat son's failure to live up to the 1963 promise to negotia Canada out of a nuclear rol y not advocating “unconditional negotiations” but rather laying down arbitrary conditions which are preventing peace and also blocking the United Nations from taking action which could bring about an end to the war, Dr, Pauling called on his audi- ence and the general public to urge the U.S, government to give up its policy of arbitrary condi- tions in bringing about a settle- ment in Vietnam, The noted scientist and peace worker said that it is irrational to think of using modern weapons of war. “Nuclear weapons,” he said, ‘‘if used efficiently could TRIBUNE ‘leaders, kill every human on earth. pointed out that there is now tons of TNT for every pel? earth — or 200,000 sticks dynamite for everyone.” Dr, Pauling was give standing ovation at the opé! his speech and again whet concluded, He was suppor the platform by one of the m0? representative groups eve? Re sembled at a peace rally, Bs cluding many leading church© tf cials, trade union andcommw Chairman of the ral! which was sponsored by the Hoc Committee to End the in Vietnam, was Pat O’N® secretary of the B,C, Federal of Labor, e UBC teach-in The B,C, Universities teach- in, held at UBC on October 8, 9, and 10, saw 600 people attend the first session with Dr, Linus Pauling, with 250 in attendance on Saturday and a smaller turnout on Sunday, The teach-in advertised itself © as a “forum for discussion” where “all sides of every ques- tion can be heard and examined,” Centered around the theme “Revolution and Response,’ it fully lived up to its promise, Saturday’s session, for ex- ample, centered on Vietnam, ~~ PS SE Pet ~ o-+ } DR. JAMES Congress ; MANHATT 1727 W. Broadw a a oe Sponsored by B.C 4 Hear + - Chairman, Canadian Peace _ } | VIETNAM | with : 5 Party Speakers Monday, October 18, 8 p.m. t a i nn a i Ad ENDICOTT } discuss AN HALL ay, Vancouver . Peace Council > be bb DDO) > a tl ln i i i lh NDS oS _from North Vietnam, debates The audience first listened to the Toronto International teach- in panel which included a repre- sentative from Cambodia who condemned U.S, aggression in Vietnam, a representative from Saigon who defended the aggres- sion and two American citizens: William Worth, who presented the National Liberation Front’s point-of-view, and Dr, Robert Scalapino, who presented the U,S. State Dept, position. During the debate, there was a repeated call from the audience to hear Michael Myerson, who had been invited to present the point of view of North Vietnam and then later was refused the right to participate, Myerson, the International Secretary of the Du Bois Clubs of American, had just returned Strong opposition to the Toronto teach- in decision was registered by the Vancouver audience, After hearing the Toronto panel, the Vancouver teach-in proceeded with a panel of its own, Three UBC professors, Wm, Holland (Head of Asian Studies Dept,), K, Holsti (Politi- cal Science Dept.), and W, Wil- mott (Anthropology Dept.) joined Vietnam war in debate with Robert Scheer, Foreign Affairs Editor of Ram- parts, a liberal U.S, Catholic magazine, Scheer charged that an over- whelming firepower, including the most modern means of mass destruction short of nuclear war, was being unleashed against the entire population of South Viet- nam by the U.S, Only Prof, Holsi defended the U.S, position, He said the situa- tion was complex and the U,S, was right in prosecuting the war, despite what he termed certain “mistakes’’ it had made, When challenged by a student from the floor, Holsi admitted he could not justify U.S. actions on “moral grounds” and someone then suggested he defend them on “immoral grounds,” The most revealing session of the teach-in was held Saturday night when Howard Green (Tory) Jack Austin (Lib,) and Bob Prit- tie (NDP) debated “Canada’s Role in a Revolutionary World,’’ Both of the first gentlemen supported present U,S. policy October 15, 1965—PACIFIC TRIBUNE—P * eu Pen at a 5 eee we ae in Vietnam, but Prittie pre sented an alternate point of¥ He called for an end to 20 a ings, withdrawal of U.S. tony and elections to be held uit UN supervisory force. The reaction of the audi to the panel was that all ¥ men did not address them? to the topic, Most of the stud felt that none of the parti were particularly well info and many expressed conce!™ our Parliament was ignora™ our revolutionary world, — The final panel on sunday told that an International Protest against U.S, aggre" in Vietnam would be hel Saturday, October 16, Va? ver’s contribution to this Protest would bea demonst?® in front of the Court Ho 12 noon on that day, Most ® a stimulant to debate, the pe in was decidedly a succeS% E ive haps next time, it will Te 5 the wider response it des© of both in university circlene from the community at