EDITORIAL Support summit meeting In the past, summit meetings between leaders of countries, certainly in the case of the Soviet Union and the United States, have tended to sweep aside the red tape which entangles lower levels of discussion, and to get down to cases. Key people on each side gain a chance to gauge the chief policy makers on the other, and to see where agreement is likely. One of President Reagan’s first acts as president was to slander the USSR as a supporter of “terrorism” (liberation struggles), to allow his subordinates to make provocative statements, and to threaten military and economic retalia- tion. In a Soviet response at the 26th Congress of the Communist Party, Pres- ident Brezhnev proposed several steps toward disarmament and détente, one of which would be a Brezhnev-Reagan summit meeting: Millions of people concerned at the deterioration of world security will see in such a summit a sane and positive mea- sure for trying to head off nuclear con- frontation. Canada, which has a stake like any other country, but is much more closely tied to Pentagon and White House ambi- tions, is obligated to take initiative in talk- ing some sense to the U.S. administra- tion. If Ottawa does not see this, then it is up to the people of Canada to put the point across. (One way is to pledge to collect a part of the million signatures on the petition addressed to Ottawa: Peace is everybody’s business.) : Opposition to the reckless U.S. course is already swirling through NATO. The journey of Gen. Haig, U.S. secretary of state, through the Middle East, peddling arms to reactionary regimes, and preach- ing incitement against the Soviet Union, opened what is termed “a serious rift” in USA-NATO ranks. Atthe recent NATO meeting in Bonn, «the U.S. defence secretary, Caspar Weinberger was bowled over by protests from U.S. allies. Chancellor Schmidt acknowledged “the dispute over funda- mental issues of defence policies.” The working people of the USA have long had good reason to demand a stop to the military squandering and the ag- gressive probing at the expense of ur- gent social needs. The government should now begin to see the light as well before it loses all its allies. A summit meeting to chart disarmament, and clear the way for the creative use of human genius, would be very much in the USA’s own interests — if one leaves aside the reactionaries whose system has no future but self-destruction. Oy Even if it has to be dragged kicking and screaming to a summit meeting, since this is one of the means to help save . the world from nuclear disaster, the USA must be compelled to agree. Cana- da’s government is called upon to press for such an outcome. - Deepening fight for jobs — In March another 55,000 Canadians joined the unemployed ranks. If the figure is accurate it raises the “official” jobless total from 928,000 in February, to 983,000. (The official figure, though, is estimated to lag 100,000 to 200,000 behind reality.) The unemployment rate, the percentage of the labor force unable to get work, is now over 8% be- fore Statistics Canada’s “seasonal ad- Justment” based on whether unemploy- ment is above or below expectations for the time of year. Seasonally adjusted, the. current rate is 7.4% . F Among men 15 to 24, not 7.4% but 14.1% cannot get jobs, and among women 15 to 24, 12.7% are denied jobs. At any age the hardship, frustration and outrage at being unable to find a job can have devastating effects. It is.not sur- prising that young people, many of whom have never had a job, are alien- ated from capitalist society. Unfortunately, that does not lead them automatically to the collective fight for a better society — socialism — but often leaves them in limbo. In the long run the fight for socialism is the answer. Labor leaders are justly critical of high . interest rates, high mortgages, and soar- ing prices, as contributors to unemploy- ment. Bob White, Canadian president of the United Auto Workers, cites interest charges to finance car buying. They are higher, he says, than the wages of auto workers who built the car! When con- sumers can’t afford to buy, jobs disap- ar. Even so, while the fight goes on against the high cost of existing, a more substan- PACIFIC TRIBUNE— APRIL 24, 1981—Page 4 tial change needs to be made by begin- ning to nationalize resources, industries and financial institutions, under strict democratic control. Not only would this ensure democratic control of the whole rocess and systematically provide jobs, it would guarantee the return of revenue to society, which now goes to the multi- nationals and their Canadian monopoly cousins. Instead of a handful of tycoons ripping wealth out of Canada to buy - cheap labor in Taiwan or South Korea, © the returns would build Canada. If Canadian workers, including young people coming out of school, are to have jobs on which to secure their lives and their futures, the people of this country have to demand new and expanded industries, nationalized and under democratic control. For an independent Canadian economy, able to guarantee employment, these changes are essen- tial. The right for jobs will be won only with tight labor unity on these issues, and with fighters for a socialist Canada in the forefront of battle. Grabbing? ~The USA took Canada to task at last month’s meeting in Paris of the Organi- zation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD). The USA objects to Canadianization of oil and gas, as in- terference with their multi-nationals, but sees nothing wrong with U.S. take-overs here, even up to 100%. The trouble with Canadianization, apparently, is that it gets in the way of the U.S.-American- ization of Canada. Flashbacks 25 years ago... OTTAWA BARS ROBESON TOUR Federal. immigration au- ~ thorities have refused entry to Canada for a concert tour by world-renowned singer, actor and civil rights activist Paul Robeson and his accompanist, Alan Booth, Jerom Concerts and Artists Ltd., commercial sponsors of the tour announced last week. He was scheduled to sing in 17 Canadian cities. — The decision by the Depart- -ment of Citizenship and Immig- ration was an about face in government policy. Just last February, Mr. Robeson gave two Canadian concerts, in Toronto and Sudbury. A spokesman for Jerom called the decision “high- handed and arbitrary” adding that “we do not believe the de- partment’s action will be en- dorsed by. the Canadian concert-going public.” Tribune, April 16, 1956 s £6 2 hemes k~y Profiteer of the week — —— a The Grafton Group Ltd., may not ring a bell, but their registers rang bells to the tune of $20,088,000 after-tax profit the year ended Jan. 31/81. They. own Maher Shoes, Toby indus tries (furnishing accessories), and operate about 90 retail outle” as well as men’s and boy’s wear departments leased at Woo stores. So, that thing you bought that you thought was a steal, wes 50 years ago... WORKERS PRESEN! UIC PETITION _ A delegation of 34 workél” from all parts of Canada p¥ sented Premier R.B. Benne their demand for NOo Contributory State Unemplo) ment Insurance, backed by | — petition carrying the signatul® of 94,169 workers and 1% poverished farmers from # ~ over Canada. The delegation was headed! - Tom Ewen, Secretary of @- Workers’ Unity League, whit sponsored the Bill. Comra® Ewen, in presenting the case Canada’s starving army of wo? ers, was subjected to const# interruption by Bennett,. W” exhibited all the pompous ar® gance of the upstart, small-to lawyer that he is and interru him at every opportunity w! his characteristic boorishness: The Work April 18, 19? PACIFIC === Editor — SEAN GRIFFIN Associate Editor — FRED WILSON Business and Circulation Manager — PAT O'CONNOR Published weekly at Suite 101 — 1416 Commercial Drive, Vancouver, B.C. V5L 3X9. Phone 251-1186 Subscription Rate: Canada $12 one year; $7 for six months. All other countries, $15 one year. ~ Second class mail registration number 1560