Three issues that arise in the digcugsion of 33-foot lots include:

Impact of 33+foot lots on density - Smaller lots would result in more
homes in a given area, and consequently, denser neighbourhoods.

Development quality ~ If the deaire is to increase densities then a number
of other alternatives should be explored. 33-lot lots, typically, reault
in the most plain and unattractive architecture that detracts from the
livability of neighbourhoods.

Creation of 33-foo0t lots in multi~family designated areas ~ The designated
multi-family areaa have been identified for redevelopment to a higher
density in order to accommodate expected population growth. To permit the
construction of new single-family housing in these areas may delay this
redevelopment from occurring, OF force its occurrence in other less
appropriate areas.

Policy Approaches:

One option is to permit 33-~foot lote in those areas of the City wheze they
are prevalent and where they reinforce the character of the area, Given the
spread of 33-foot lots throughout the western half of the City, it would be
difficult to derive fair and equitable criteria that would allow 33-foot lots
in one area and not in another.

Another option is to create a new zone for 33-foot lots and permit them
throughout the City. This would have the long term effect of creating denser
neighbourhoods.

Council also has the option of not permitting any new 33~foot lotsa by
subdiviaion. The rationale for thie policy is that the smaller lots de not
produce the style or type of housing that is encouraged in the City and that
many of the existing 33~fo0t lots are located in areas identified for
redevelopment to a more intensive use.

KK

~ Arch., M.C.1.P.
anner Director of Planning

JL/klr

1D576-25/26