Oth, 1973.

soe by! Aldofman Ranger:

That the letter ‘from The Honourable Robert ‘Williams, Minds er: of ‘Lands, Forests

and We Water. Res pources, , apeia: 18th, 1973 resending the = proposed construct ion of. the, :

“Arnott -Kidd #2 Transmission Line, be ‘received.

Prior to | the ‘question being called | on the , foregoing resolution Alderman Meyer

Qu « he. “found it surprising 1 that this Councit would take ‘a. “strong. ‘stand ‘on an issue,

: send a reprusentat rive to a Public Hearing, ‘be promised a | full Public Hear ‘ng by the
rovinelal Government, and ‘then, simply acquiesce to’ what he stated te: be a very y ake

handed decision with very ivtle foundation in fact, and | pioposed the. , following ‘notion:

Moved by. Alderman Meyer:

Seconded by Alderman Laking:
“that the foregoing proposed resolution be tebled for. Ewo weeks in 1 order chat
Alderman. Neyer may have the: opportunity | to. » explore t the 2 possibility that the Agures Q woes

“contained. in | the letter from the ie Chadian of th the 3. c. ‘Hydro & Power - authority, fareh.

23rd, 1973 regarding, the construction. of the Armott-Kidd ia Transmission Line;, and
repeated in a lett er ‘fron the Minister of Lands, For ests, & Water Resources, Apel

ae, 1973, may be. in incorrect. : ‘Carried.
; whee Toe Fae: —_ wk Alderman. Ranger voted | against: the resolution...

Alderman: Ranger referred: tq. the. second paragraph: of Mee cass-Beggs' Jeter a
ern: ‘that this. decision would probably delay electricity being made, available
2 to.a, number of: areas; however, Alderman Mayer pointed out: that. the people. of. Reh

‘mond were strongly 0 opposed to. ) overhead wiring and the: use of -a- crisis situation is

a very well- known ploy ‘to, deter opposing aétiony fest

. CORRESPONDENCE & PEVITIONS +

“Woodside

_. Estates:

6 re proposed
‘change in:
- water, ta

trom Michael Je ‘Connelly, Property Manager | Strata ¥lan NW. 20, » April 6th,
1973 regarding the change: in, water rates with’ respect to Woodside states at 3046
Coast Meridian Road, cand advising that: the’ Counctt ‘Of. Strata Plan’ N W 20: has re~
quested t the: Council - to: reconsider and reject: the. proposed: change, being 2 a 100%
. increase, for ‘the’ following ‘reasons:
“there! ds. only ‘a single « connection to city mains: to: o be maintained, ‘not 52 as

: the: ease! woud: be” aE ‘these were: single famiy dvolLings:

-

‘the: water consuaption for the outside of the buildings, ve co ‘lawn watering, is
- much less. on.a per unit. basis than that for single family duvetLings. as. there. is

@: much less. and: ‘area: per avelLing unites Seta

the charge levied: by ‘the: city of Port oosy 4 is oni: $25:00 -annualiy on devel-_-

opments of a ‘similar nature.” ao

“Alderman: ‘Ranger pointed out that! ‘connections. to single family ‘bas sdonces do oe

“need naintenance and commented there is 2 # good chance. the $25, 00. charged in Port:

“Hoody. is subsidized from ‘the Mater ‘Utility out of General Revenue, which: is poor oe

“financial practice.