iw;.=::.m'i
.=.= .m'[

" =
=iw

g
I

I

..'

Ilm IH&','','.

'

I'5

III II I L

„„„-

—

'
m

m

@n

='='I,"'ai

&R

I

II Kl

(I IIImIi i
THE CORPORATION OF THE CITF OF PORT COOUITLAN

ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT

'lcm
III l~

C~

li. II I
u n
41 II

Ir
If
'

II
ll

Ri

lal

regular meeting of tbe Economic Development Committee was held in the
Planning Department on: Tuesday, January 28, 1992 at 3:30 p.m.

A

lllI

~

ln uag

I

I III IW

In attendance were

III

Alderman N. Gordon, Chairman
Alderman M. Gates, Co-Chairman
~

SI

Carlos Felip, Director of Community Planning

igm
U~ ~15

Also in attendance

ia

lg4

'9 (~a

II
I

II

I

Ill%i

IIIrEW

Cl

Ms. Myra Ross — Now Newspaper

I '%! *'

CONFIRNATION OF NINVTES

HI:i

44

i,& 444', III

Ii I',!iU

~ If ll
iekl IIal[gllII

&%

That the minutes of the meeting of the Economic Development Committee beld
on Tuesday, January 14, 1992 be taken as read and adopted.

jIH 4

11

'll

I

h

I

4;Kiimml

IH41

Ia I's II
&

I

If L mm

II&

mme i

11

mII

I

Ili

jjl

u III

LXEHH:

l. Accessory Home Businesses

I

44RGGRIRRdssl:

I
'I

That the Bylaw be made available to the Public at tte Nunicipal Hall and
Terry Fox Library snd appropriate ads be placed in the local papers. The
Bylaw is also to be referred to the Chamber of Commerce for comments.

I

I

IEW

m
I%II I ~ II H4R
IIPI111141 111

4

441I III

I[,ill

eI ~ II

RI

as

I

11

4Iiln

II

,141'4

''0
411

If

Recommended:

«! ~
I

I

Ir

fii

That the draft Bylaw be received for information.

1

~

"'i

4"

111'

2. Sign Bylaw

g

Carried.

i

I

..2/

ask r ~ ill

144 Il

&

'" '-''j~

u

I

lcm'

JAN ze ssz

1

11

m

~I I~ SI

~
IP1 ia hhh ~ iial
Rfl h Ai I I J P 1RR1
i

~

III'Ili
I

~ Pa

II I

I

I m p amas i!
i

ra a

~ I

.':

I

'

Il I I
i

IIa

pI

i

I

II

I I „;;, = ~

=--=

.-;„=-:-,:;==.

=;;=- '''lama gs ilail
=-''=-".-:%liiIII TI,',.:. ':;===-==-. .——
l

II ali

IIIISI I WLli

W I I I I 1 I Sssr

I

I I

==
=:.

—

I IR I S I Ses a «a

~il IQg assisi
N $%

I

1

I

II

I

l

~~

lse'1 SIIIISII

nlsssgp
~r.II+~j&~aslsmsth
~~~RIIsIIRslsglsslpsz
Ilmls — 1

Ja

~

I

ii ii!

.-1

I

SW11saa hell

II

RTs Icia p hl
'I 'll

'I'l

~

11 s I s I ss s!

i1

iils; II

I

I

II-:

I'im,!I !!II

S ls I lm «
Iml 11 sa

I

I

IS)

IRIIR

I

)ii!iml,l li

I~Ill

IIiN~II|I

I!

3. Home and Trade Fair
Recommended:

That'he Planning Department prepare a brief background paper with

information and analysis on the Home and Trade Fair. This information will
be used by Alderman Gordon and Alderman Gates in their upcoming submission

II I!!lammed pm
III 1IIISS

II

ii:IIISS IIII]

to the Chamber of Commerce.

!iliIII

Carried

!

fiji, il
ADJOURNMENT:
IS

I I

11 I

I II
I

e iI

1 I I

Sll

At 4I30 p.m. the meeting adjourned.

I

I

i

IIIII'I'1I

I'I

I
1 I 'll
I

15 I II

II I

m jiasmlll
g,'$! L! i it Ill

l~
/

Ilk!III
Alderman NC Lordon
Chairman

II

II

Ig g
~

II Ii~

I I

I iI I"I

I

I (
~

]/gal
I

ll 1SI I
1

S Ililllm

,iapes a ssm
SR 1 I I I I W

iII

!

8 IiIIIII
I

l

i'Ql5 li'!

IIII

lmlt I.

'P ~ S«
iRI sl

'j I 1R lliill
I

ri
II'

I

I

11!

I

a

i

!~~a'alia!

LSS'ha

j

II!II 'ASS

I

I
ai

S

St I

!

I
l

1,

i

jiiiil!
~

lp::::'

I

Sl

IJ

I

I

Ii! I ll Ii II,

ID543-2/3

iiil
a

~IIII
St
h

s

~

~

I

lh

I

il

'

---

~

hi a ~

I

i I ii(I!I I,'IImi)I/

a

,;- ~f'II,!ii
[ a,

I

t I Imt
.

r

( ..

Ii I&4~ Jl IRIIi=

~ I

,a...

al

~ ma\

r

i
I

lf S
~

~

S

al

J
I h.

alai

~'sic

,',,',

,'$

~gmNjti Ni!:

—

—

Saints

--- .: 'llflflll!%j44444EPE~

-

-'-,— —:=::===='= = SLN".='=~

=-

—

Iiii w& ~ a1)l

'Hlllif

',

«

'*--== —

'~'&

g gml4PPINOtll

li =;=,~'.4,. Sits,mdl4 P4844P

-~j~ ~a ~

m &m~~gE illl II

THE CORPORATION OF TRE
CIA OF PORT CO44UITLAM

I'EIIOAN44444.4

NRSJ N I Ps I
NRIJ
) IRR INP 14

-=.==l5III5
LIH '4,mFmRII
.-; —;.

TOr

Mr. B. R.

Kirk

Carlos Felip
Director of Planning

44.

44s

44

I

ii

—

g

If'"',"
141IIIIIRP

I

44

~

I E
&

I

)II@II

IIIII'conomic

NLIAI m

i

Il~sum&

FileI Sign Bylaw

IR'IW

Ell4PPjll!)
lyal —

j~gg,g

Ill

January 28, 1992

City Administrator

FRO444

Mjgj

jj

Development Committee Meeting — January 28, 1992

&I

R'lIR 5

Submitted for general discussion ss requested by th44 Chairman of

Economic Development Committee.

SMIIRJISISI

f jill l III'

EACEGROUND r

II'aaaa
g

I

4R4RI

R tl

L!l aa
IUS 4 M

'a
i

I

I

j a~i

f!4

Ja. uary 20, 1992 the Municipal Council passed a resolution to refer
the Sign Bylaw to the Planning and Development Committee
to seek further input
from City Merchants.
On

m

441 I

-ill!

jj5 I ilslslsg M

i~] $

LLII PREP

On January 27, 1992, the Chairman of the Economic
Committee
asked the Director of Planning to refer the Sign Bylaw toDevelopment
the Econcmic

a»i:

Development Committee for information.

'Ifl KRJ 'll

SIGN BYLAN REWIEN HISTORY

,"„= .IIL
3 I'lr4=4Fgj
j Ij

March 1, 1990: At a Port Coquitlam/UDI Liaison Committee meeting,

li
g

'tll
I

I

lli

had requested some of their members to look at the Port
Coquitlam Bylaw and a number of concerns had been expressed
about the complexity of the Bylaw and the lack of
to
base approval on the merits of the signs design, inability
relation
to
its use and context.
UDI

II

N 4 14'III

I'

SI 'I

illql il 44
May

1, 1990:

The Director of Planning informed the City Administrator

ll

'

...2/

I

14'

dl

i

I I

4

I

I

I

~

4.

~ 4 I

I

I

I

ai 'mi4

i

Ilail

I,

44daa i& ia

j'IpaJ aa 44m& 44

I~gg!I

Ltll

~

j

4IS IS
'
I 4

P PI R
Ia ll R

Pl'411

==.::
a

~

'l
'll
Jlg

'4

~,I 4 4

I

ll
u

&I

~

+

4JIalal 414 4

s

,I
I

I

~

4

m

la

..

~

44

4114 IIII

IIII

S4

I

I ts

If

il
'I4

ll

~

~

that

the Planning Department would proceed with the review of the
Sign Bylaw as an ongoing project.

4'4 4

IIjJ

R~

(

III I I

44 ~

S~JP

j&'ielpf,ff)

representatives of UDI expressed their desire that the City of
Port Coquitlam's Sign Bylaw be reviewed.

P!4 I

I

I

I I

jff

r

jjl4

4

RID

On January 21, 1992 the Planning Committee instructed "That
the Planning
Department place and ad in the local papers inviting concerned citisens
to
review the draft (Sign) Bylaw which will be made available at the Planning
Department and Terry Fox Library. The draft Bylaw is also to be referred to
the Chamber of Commerce requesting further comments within two or three weeks"

I:VIII I

=

ISl E. 1~1
ms Is

4

4

I

's ~—

a

''

i

lee
ss s

kin
Nisgi~

4I

'I W gmPS

igg

Wl

S I'

I

ss

I

lm

I

'

oil liRRIjj
erne~~ ss

m es eep

II

lil II i%

jmiii'8 /i
i~" d~~~l I
j

I

IIBfh
e.=:

=~)

siss 5

~II

g II

IS@

I I

~

sm

~111

'gl,H
eee I 1

I

I

li

'ml

eg ji

~ ii/g/sf

s

IIs ~ 'se s semi[ g
111I ee I seal eg
s

I

IIII

.:.'l

IIII

I

IWILI II.

Ml ~ Ill

~i Ill

Oct. 2, 19901

The revised Sign Bylaw is

Nov. 1, 1990:

The Chamber of Commerce provides written
Department on the draft Sign Bylaw.

for perusal as nd comments.

@Milli

I' e

referred to the Chamber of Commerce

July 25, 19911 The Nunicipal Solicitor submits a further review of the Sign
Bylaw, again with acme wording changes to better relate it to
the Port Coquitlam Biilding and Plumbing Bylaw 1991.
Aug. 1, 1991:

Aug. 7, 1991 1

le I I

Isllllli ll )
jsi IBEIII'I'ii
1i

ps

I

to the Planning Department a
revised Sign Bylaw in accordance with instructions received
from the Planning Department.

I

s

I

I

1

I

.

I

i

i

I I II I
ep I

ls
Is

iiml5

i

~

s

seem ~

[glue

~

~ i

i

/

'

I,I I

IF==-

Council in Committee after some discussion referrs the Sign
Bylaw to a special Saturday morning worl-shop, at a date to be
determined, for all members of Council to have a chance for
II

I

'IIN

(4)(d) of the Sign Bylaw allowing Council, by resolution to
authorize the posting of community signs, as requested by

e

~

I

ii'iill81 III fl

full input on this. Bylaw.
Sept.10, 19911 The Nunicipal Solicitor submits a revision of Section 0.3

I

I

lip

I

lug. 12, 1991: The Nunicipal Council, in consideration of the complexity of
the Sign Bylaw, referrs it to Council in Committee for further
Aug. 26s 1991:

1ile

s

iil i II m'im

The Planning and Development Committee receives a report on the
Sign Bylaw from the Planning Department. The Commit ve pass a

discussion.

s

~

kN lll

ll

iilss e

m e ee

The Nunicipal Solicitor submits

prepared by Planning.

iii

I

s

iflWf

resolution recommending that the Nunicipal Clerk be authorized
to prepare a Bylaw to emend the Sign Bylaw as per the draft

si I

U

e

III III j3'I l

input to the Planning

III I

ie s esses I

smml4

June 24, 19911 The Nunicipal Solicitor advises that the proposed Sign Bylaw
appears to be consistent and workable snd submits a revised
draft with a number of wording changes.

I I Is I IIII

'111 i

Is

Ie

with representatives of the Electrical Sign Ass"ciation to
discuss the Sign Bylaw and receive their input.

I

'ing

III:l ll„,

July 15, 1990: The draft Sign Bylaw is sent to UDI snd the British Columbia
Electrical Sign Association for perusal and comments.

I

~

slllnae

I

)11 II
fg

~j

spill

I

June 14, 19901 The draft Sign Bylaw is referred to the Engineering, City
Clerks, Fire, Parks and Recreation and Bs:ilding Departments for
comments.

ig1lpssrp

I I

I

es 1p

June 12, 1990 I The Department's Junior Planner reported to the Director on the
first draft of the Sign Bylaw.

,peas ilsss
:e sssse

s

I

I

Aug-Sept 1990: Several meetings take place with representatives of UDI and

II S

I

s

~I IlsRmll SIMBA

I

lg NILII
Igmciiii
mp I I

~
g)

ssB

ll'1

g

)~IBIRIWIK=g~ '„,m'NIPIisemIij='eempmm

e'e

ees

~ M ~

--1.e"
SF-:
2 m se-'..".".IPPIII I

I I

Council.

I

e

I'iii

,

..3/

4j ji

I

'''

s
s

JAN 28 1992
'
s

~

Ili I I II

sssL

ii!I ~

""''

4'l

;

1

I

II »... I

m
w

I

I'

I

'i'i i

'll
s

es 'I

s&

I

el

I, lel

" 'elml idi
s

s

mss ~

m!

l

~ ~ '—
nl s

'n

RR I SR-

119 IC:::

/

ln'll--'*

«~

l!Niw;"

m ~ ss

~n ~~
E!

EN-. -::

ns

lgR N& ll

I

ie5m iiii i iilNL

Nav.

l!5'ill f

i

s =='

-='lE?

a EE...;-"-!

al-. '.'=0!
I

I

'

I

Ik?
I
'm?? iw! I'!!
I

/'f—

III ~ I I ills
lb!

I

il I ll? II

~ I I IR I I ~ In !N

nlsmis il E fl

!

iwispl I

ll gl?

i

s

I

g@rg&pi

-em, ll'8 ll

I

NI)5

16, 1991: In a Saturday morning session all members of Council peruse and
discuss the Sign Bylaw and agree on a final draft. The
Planning Department is instructed to implement some changes
suggested by Member of Council and have the final draft of the
Bylaw properly prepared and perused by the Municipal Solicitor.

n

maximum sign area and

id!Imiil

be revised.

'
EMIR s

pSlig

II
I

I

I

lllsl~

I

RII

'i

g'I

,

~

N'!!Il 5

-i I

of Commerce for comments.

Il
I II Is

I'e".

I

!

Il, sill e I Rl
I

~

Carl

CF/kll
ID543 — 4/6

I

RRI RRPRs ss—
I

'SSSIPISR

I

li ~

'I ~

S

"

!l

R

'lI

S ~

~ iis

i

I
I

I SS

RS

'''

JAN Z8 '692

'S'I

~

ssjg I

I

gl Ei iiii E i!

xiii I!I!

15!

II Vl i I
I

I

.i!?!

I'1!

i

l! i

» -sis
I-..I?II

!

I

Aegi

I

llsn II I

Iii ~ II

*

[)

~

Ik!l!

Rnn I

!

Should the public input process or comments from the Chamber of Commerce
identify very serious concerns with the Bylaw, reviews will b: made prior to
introduction of the appropriate Bylaw.
II..!@

ms

Ilii iii?il

1992, in consideration of the technical complexity of the
Committee decided to seek direct public input by
the
Planning
Bylaw,
Sign
making copies of the draft Sign Bylaw available to the public and
appropriately advertising this in the los:al papers. The Planning Committee
also decided to refer once more the final version of the Bylaw to the Chamber

!''i,VIIII

I

I!lail

On January 21,

:;,n

I

"'

At the January 20, 1992, however, Council decided that more direct
public input was perhaps advisable.

I Pal R

I

'Rln "I

inspections for electrical permits will

Over the past five months Council hss considered the Bylaw in a number
of occasions and had approved the Bylaw in a principle.

4 Ills! INI

RII

!

slnl

to two years now.
Canside.rable input has been received from other Municipalities, the Urban
Devels;pment Institute, the Chamber of Commerce and the British Columbia
Electrical Sign Association.

I

Issi

I

j! M I! I!

The Sign Bylaw has been in the making for close

insnan

I

il innl

I

[IIRI IR

(i

DISCUSSION:
nl
nl

5r

I

Jan. 22, 1992l Letter to the British Columbia Electrical Sign Association from
the Planning Department clarifying a rumber of points for the
benefit of the Association and informing that the sections on

lI,ii?ii,i,1II
I

— = .'? 3 ill

~a~-'= w lit~

Jan. 21, 1992: The Planning Commitl.ee instructs that ads be placed in local
newspapers .inviting concerned citisens to look at the Bylaw.
The Bylaw is also referred to the Chamber'f Commerce.

i! s!1%11IINIQ
R

I

Jan. 20, 1992: The British Columbia Electrical Sign Association writes the
Planning Department, requesting a number of clarifications of
interpretations of the Sign Bylaw; the Association notes that
the section dealing with the need far a Provincial Electrical
Permit and the section indicating how the nsaximum sign area is
to be calculated cauld be improved.

!

,

I

Lime.-..—: — '?

':5!I 9! ml;

Jan. 20, 1992 l Council refers the Sigh Bylaw to Planning and Development,
Committee to seek further input from City Merchants.

Idyll?Ikll!
'%
Rn

gg f I s I ss

'gg Il ~ il

RR

in'I)

!gals

I! Ps

'ii

„lni

mmes

??ENI';

g f gf ~s=-':I @

I! n I s I IR

smsl IIIR .

I I

—

I lmRII R &wM
s R
s

'.'MR hs

n la

s

EN

lli

18:--- I=:

'l'

I.

~ S
Il;..—.
-= llil
'

I sI

BI

&

II I

I

=~
— 'Sep p

u I's ~ I = I

ill SN i
Iz zl III
I

„":.-.=.-.;

I

smm

I

i ili'ii i'"-iima sm —

Ijl

I

I I

=: =.=.;

R

ij s

~

—, 'J RR I I 1

=

— — — —

I

s

s

I ~

-P

~

I

III

I

I

~IRggg sips4~:

—.- —I m

=:=-:, ""='=
i'll
ml ~

I

l

5

N7 Is &Ilglliii

Iiji

RI

I

--- - .; ~ IIIII

='BRIN'-

—

—

—.

s I I s LL~
S ll'
I

S m

gjg

I

PJ IJl
SSI pll gs I

— — ~-'

I I

I I

'~$ 445 III B BIFIII

s

II Bl

&

s s

s s P ~ IAIB
i

I

I

I g

I S ISSI Il Sllil
'ajlm
jll
ls
s Jggl II s jis II % llssi»'" .—" -..- =R I BI.'I Bj .
—
- ~~
„— "

ygjss:::=:: ''=sl Iss ss
~

.

:"
'l m i!Nll

Issslsmiifamlisp - — mgflil llIYW
PP a ——

Ig

""""

Ip »mlmllJsg%[
ISNII4T",

II III

I R4 N I I Nl I I

REGUIATED SIGNS

iililllll

EXEMPT SIIN(S

restricted by zone

siting& size and
appearance regulations

government notices

traffic control
street signs
interior signs
devices

municipal election
vehicle signs,
unless on stationary
vehicle

or matter

portable

bench (2)

community (2)

directional'2)
real estate (2)

~

I''! I IIIIII
I

IIII

vehicle signs on a
stationary vehicle

mm gal

~

i&e.8
IL) lkll
ig
II smn

window (2)

ls

ii-:~
II Ail
$
II%

B II

I IIII

I~

I

flags snd emblems
memorial plaques, conerstcnes,

changeable copy

snd historical
bench (3)

fascia
freestanding
projecting

I'l

I

'H I
I,I j,l'III

window (3)

development (3)

S
S
s

I

I

I

I

I

'~.:.=: Rjl
I

I

js em i

I

Is
II

44

II

directional (3)

non-commercial

PERMIT APPLICATION

~

I

I M IDI I
II W

political
real estate (3)

balloon
off-premise

sr slim N

tablets

cosssunity (3)

sandwich board
promotional

"-."--'iiijj')I
I

NO PERMIT REOUlBED

canopy

Is ~ s'

'll ll

ih&i&i
sp s ~ s s/
s
sp
I

PERNIT REQUIRED

sii i

—

sill asap

'lllli'l5

Ijjj jj'Ia issm Ijlt

I

s

ss

i

lzlli

S

IS III
s ~

SII'

I

11 I
J s

II

N ':.
s I sp

~ '

ll
Jj 4 j

j

4

s

tll

I

I

I

I

s

.s

'

REVIEW AND APPROVAL

I

sl

I

I:

I

PERMIT ISSUANCE UPON

I

II II

(1)

Prohibited Imlers with consent by owner of building or lot.

(2)

These signs prohibited unless they meet conditions.specifed in Section 6.3
of the Sign Bylaw.

(3)

Subject to conditions specified in Section 6.3 of the Sign Bylaw.

N

I.II

ss

JAN 28 199Ã

&ps

) eats i
lmss em
I Szj

as 1 Il

-"~ IUBWBNI4"

I

~

off-premise (1)
flashing
rotating
roof
emitting sound, odour

IS%BI'

II

I

BI s i i Imi sl

LRRIBITED SIGNS

I!!IM=::-. j
"" III I'
III

I

IIIIIII Ij!i

SIGN BILAN

I

IB

III'H Ij

!II

banner

~

I

M sp

=-

L„=

I

I

w'if

jjt-r: =;: ...

sj .".—: ::
ms

I)i jjj4

'

—

—

, ~ I

R~