CIA IN CUBA US. accused of interference By WILLIAM DEVINE Tribune Staff Correspondent HAVANA 'S. President Johnson was public- ly accused in Havana éarly this month of being responsible for a plot to murder Cuban leaders, in- cluding Prime Minister Fidel Castro. The charge was made by Castro him- self in a speech Aug. 10 to the closing session of the first conference of the Organization of Latin American Soli- darity (OLAS). Castro based his accu- sation on testimony given by two groups of agents, who admitted to backing and organization by the U.S. Central Intelligence Agency, and who were captured recently while trying to land on Cuban territory. In two dramatic highlights of the OLAS gathering, both groups were questioned at two separate press con- ferences, to which were invited OLAS delegates and guests and representa- tives of the world press on hand for the OLAS meeting. In both cases a substantial amount of weaponry and highly sophisticated radio and electronic equipment, which expert testimony revealed to be ex- clusive to the CIA, was captured in the possession of the agents, all of whom were Cubans who had previous- ly left the country. Thus, the material as well as the spoken evidence was overwhelmingly conclusive. Detail after detail of CIA involvement - was disclosed under the most minute ques- tioning of Cuban state security offi- cials and the press. Four of the six in the first group questioned had been captured July 18 (one other had been wounded and was in the hospital). The fifth had been captured last April and the sixth was detained in September, 1965. This last had also taken part in fighting against the Constitutionalist forces in Santo Domingo in April, 1965. Adding to the drama of the press conferences was the fact that the sec- ond group of two (a third escaped) had been captured on the very day—Aug. 6—that the first group was being ques- tioned. The second group was ques- tioned Aug. 9. Of the eight questioned, tive admitted to being direct CIA agents. The other three, all from the group captured July 18, denied direct agent status, but admitted association with and direction by CIA agents. One of these, speaking of the so-called Cuban exile groups in the United States, confirmed that “all. the organ- izations in exile are closely linked with the Central Intelligence Agency.” All those questioned said they sailed to Cuba from Florida. Admitted aim of the four captured July 18 was three-fold: first, to estab- lish contact and consolidation in Cu- bas’ western most Pinar del Rio prov- ince, where they landed; second, to spread a movement of subversion to Havana, hand in hand with acts of sa- botage against specific industries, in- cluding the Mariel power plant and the Niagara sugar mill; third, to assa- sinate, as occasions presented them- selves, leaders of the Cuban Revolu- tion. Number one target was Fidel Castro. For this last purpose they had brought silencer-equipped _ revolvers and poison-tipped bullets, all of which were displayed together with the pri- soners. The mission of the second group was to infiltrate one of their _ number into Cuba. The one to be infil- trated escaped, but various maps to be used by him were captured. On all maps but one, an obvious blunder by someone, a neat hole had been clipped out. But on the unclipped map ap- _ peared the words: “For official use by the United States government.” re % 8 how v ( * f : VENCEREM - Even more revealing was the fact that some of the maps had Cuban mi- litary and rocket sites marked on them. The obvious conclusion was that such maps could only be of use for an offensive attack against Cuba. During the questioning cf the second group, one reporter's question suggested that those captured may merely have been members of a Cuban exile group, rather than CIA agents. (This, despite the ad- missions cited earlier.) In his closing speech to the OLAS conference, Fidel Castro took up this question of the CIA versus Cuban exile groups. “Is it that the United States government does not feel re- sponsible for the felonies committed by (those) organizations in the US.?” he asked. “‘Are they now going to say that they are not responsible when it was they who organized all those peo- ple, they who suckled them, indoctri- nated them, prepared them, if they have been trained in U.S. institutions? Is it that because of their being exiled organizations, this exonerates the gov- ernment of the United States from its responsibilities? “But it did not concern, unfortu- nately for them, a group of these through which the CIA works, but the direct CIA organization. The embar- rassing thing about this is that it was the direct work of the CIA, not the indirect work of counter-revolution- ary organizations. Because the CIA works indirectly through these coun- ter-revolutionary organizations. And it also works directly—as was explained to you.” Castro also ridiculed the idea that private individuals in the US. could buy, “‘in an ordinary 5 and 10 cent store,” the highly advanced elec- tronic equipment that was captured. September 15, 1967—PACIFIC TRIBUNE—Page 6 ~~; all He then took note of a public state- ment of an Armando Fleites, a leader of the Second Front of Escambray movement based in Florida, that the four invaders captured July 18 were on a mission “to kill Prime Minister Fidel Castro, which would form part of a campaign of irregular warfare de- signed to overthrow the Communist regime.” And on this point, he added to his earlier pin-pointing of the CIA as directly responsible, and included his accusation against Johnson: “Is it that the government of the United States does not feel respon- sible for these acts?” he asked again. “We directly accuse. the U.S. govern- ment and hold it responsible for these acts; we accuse President Johnson and hold him responsible forthe fact that plans were drawn up in the United States for the assassination of govern- ment leaders of another state, using the most abhorrent methods, and these plans were not only being carried out but — partially — were also brazenly made public.” Castro dealt with another assertion that had been made—that the presen- tation of the captured CIA agents had been with a view to the forthcoming conference of foreign ministers of the Organization of American States. (The OAS foreign ministers are scheduled to meet in Washington Sept. 23 to take up Venezuelan charges of Cuban “in- tervention.”’) The capture of CIA agents, said Cas- tro, “has become so common here, it is a weekly occurence.” And he added: “Is it our purpose perhaps to convince the OAS? Who is going to make a joke about such a thing. We don’t intend to convince the OAS, we don’t intend to impede OAS agreements. We have other ways of impeding OAS agree- any case yo ments! We intended in 2 ot monstrate how cynical td He men of the OAS are, hea gsi U.S. government. We inte im to unmask them; we inteih is moralize them.” on We “But we do not intend 10 tel as an excuse,” he continu@ (igi does not have even an 4 + hate respect, the OAS does no" ptt atom of morality. And none ait ; ernments of this contine? re exception of Mexico—™@@) ted accomplices in the acts dage against our countty, tion they were in the interven ihe Dominican Republic and vials - deeds carried out by imper at oh the slightest right t0 inv" 1e princy at? | i 1) ‘i tionary movement! B smashed all norms, 4 ciples. And this is th it is not ours.” eir res : G In a_ special resolution conference had earlier co a OAS as the “preferred the execution of the ris te policy of U.S. imperia™: forthe America.” It denounce f mel” ing OAS foreign minist?™ i “signifying a renewee in ‘og pare adequate conditions aggression against — Cuba.” It further said ill charges against Cuba ee a pretext to create 4 eect American Peace Force: said OLAS, would be for aggression agains cipally against the aH The OLAS ‘¢ called on all Latin to oppose the abjec Americanism of the 4 port revolutionary. eat based on the union headed by their militar on of the fight for the liquide gett ist exploitation a? ‘tie native oligarchies, also be the end of the t a ’ Lf é oie BIEN