. As well, we were required to separate our building from the
residential designated area to the south by 66 feet. Therefore, should,
residential be proposed for 1878 McLean, we shall demand that a similar
66 foot buffer strip be provided along the west side of our building.

_ Ags previously explained, our building has no side yard set-back so the
66 feet will have to come from 1878 McLean. After the 66 feet, then the
standard rear yard set-back would also be required. It is advised that
you calculate just how much land would be left to actually build on once
the buffer strip is provided.

One of the reasons that your clients may be considering a
residential subdivision of this site is because an industrial use that
was proposed for the site was opposed at a Public Hearing. The reason

t was opposed was that the industrial use consisted of a number of
smaller strata-titled industrial buildirigs with several driveways leading
onto Taylor Street. The residents in the area were very opposed to the
driveways leading onto Taylor. Therefore, the impression that has now
come out of it all is that industrial is no longer an acceptable use for
the site. 7 aan

we do have a different idea of how this property should be.
developed. The property should be industrial in zoning with a building
built using our warehouse wall as a common wall. Access to the site
would be from McLean Avenue only to accommodate the concerns of the
local residents who opposed driveways on Taylor. The following diagram
will give you lan idea of what we think the building would look like in
comparison to ours. | me |

raven wa awe Om Lae. ad rain corm add

é

Sins Ce

Tay Low STR

ING
WARE Hote

Oa! waRb House

gesTéb=

~ Sugg
oy a a 4

REsiIn BNCE

EXIST
do030'

r)
toe
e