June 14th, 1976

boundary of the proposed Lincoln Avenue which abuts the property, is
7 also the Ciry boundary, etc.

From the Planning and Zoning Committee, June 10th, 1976 with respect

Planning & Zoning
Comm. June 10/76
re rezoning appl'f
R#6/76 - s. of
Fir St.

Oo a rezoning application (R#6/76) which was previously presented to the
Council at its April 12th, 1976 meeting and subsequently presented to
a Public Information Meeting ou May 4th, 1976 recommending that rezoning

of the proposed 9-lot subdivision south of Fir Street be approved.

Moved by Alderman Laking:

Seconded by Alderman Mabbett:

That the report of ~:~ the Planning and Zoning Committee, June

10th, i976 with respect to rezoning Application R#6/76 recommending

that Lot 421, Plan 48883 be rezoned from RS~2 (One Family Suburban
Residential) to RS~1 (One Family Residential) to permit a proposed 9-lot

subdivision, be approved.

Carried.

Alderman Ranger voted against the resolution.

During discussion of the foregoing resolution Alderman Laking noted

the access and servicing problems involved in the area, partly due to

the adjacent land to the west thereof remaining unsubdivided and advised

that servicing to the easterly lots will have to come from Freemont
Street. Alderman Ranger questioned the remarks in the report which
suggested that the westerly boundary of the subdivision be fenced as a
condition of the rezoning. Alderman Laking pointed out that this was

a requirement and the request had come from the owner of the abutting
property at the Public Information Meeting and the Developer, who had
been present at the meeting, had agreed to construct a standard form of
fence in order to control debris and children from the subdidvision
trespassing on the property. The Developer was present in the gallery
and reconfirmed that he was prepared to construct the fence to accommodate
the owner of the westerly property.

Moved by Aiderman Ranger:

Seconded by Alderman Thompson:

That the original resolution be amended to exclude the requirement
that fencing be constructed along the western boundary of the property.
Defeated.
Aldermen Mabbett, Ranger and Thompson voted in favour of the resolution.

Alderman Ranger again stated his concern that an item such as