Lam Gah rig
4028 Taranta Streat
Poet equgtiam, Boe
VOX GxB
Ortebeyr 17, Is54
eee rlos Keli
mityoot Part Gaquiaitlam
2360 Shaughnessy Street
Peayt Gsquitlam, Bf

Deay
Mes Davelopmant Variance Farmit Ne, 40/94 far 1388 Apel Drive
Loan certainly sppesed ta the granting af thig permit and 1

wander why the sity is aven eemngidaring it. It spens the
dasy to mther varianee applicatiang.

Tonete concarns of the city engineer ing dapartmant .

Appraximate@ly an@ year age an applicatian fay tawnhouge
davelaomant was turned dawn for this preperty,. There was
mverwhelming r@jectian at a public meeting tm the cage put
forward by this same applicant. In thig application I see ne
public meeting.

The area is zoned fer single family hames. The gity has
existing setbacks, access requiramants, fr antage
requirements, ete which presumably the sity set for the
banefit of the city and neighbeurheed. Naw why shawld the
wity vary fer this property? Just what benefit is thera tea
the neighbourhosd ar the city in this variance? I suspect
nena, the anly benefit is ta the applicant in realizing a
higher value far the property.

t doen't feel it ig the obligation af the city te gclve the
applicants problem at the expense mf «ity standards. The
small late, original ta the area fram 1713 were cancellad aut
by preavicus swners basically to yealize lewer taxes hy
halding «ne large piece af oraparty of several accra. Over
the years that large piece has been divided several times at
a benetit. Hera we find the present owner af a large lot
wishing ta benefit by dividing and finding it restrictive due
ta the eity standards. This cwner toa, oanefited by a lawer
purchase pric@ and reduced taxes, and like all ethers mist
accept the visk that goa@s with that when seeking ta divide.
He aheuld expect ta be raquired ta meet city standards as
they axist and nat saak apecial coangideratian,

Thia is an evample of a Histary af NON=FLANNING, that yeu
shauld net address by varying what plan the city hag with

pony OV a

regards ta standards. (TERA

toa: