Thad it Dyson Carter upsefs _ diet faddists’ ideas DYSON CARTER, 102 Kendal Avenue, Toronto 4, Ont.: In a re- Cent issue of the Pacific Tribune, Mr, E. J. Fridleifson writes a let- ter critical of a letter of mine the Pacific Tribune printed. My original letter was not| in- Personal letter, and I am rather Surprised that the Pacific Tribune ran it without writing to me first. There is nothing in that letter I Would retract. But, as you must know, the phrasing of a personal that of a public statement. Mr. Fridleifson implies that I Pose as a god or all-wise person. I hardly think that is justified. Further, I think my 15 years of Study and reporting on medical advances, including therapies and nutrition,. qualify. me to make Some statements, even though I 8m not an authority on “naturo- Pathy.” Mr. Fridleitson’s letter reveals a Very widespread, and completely false, unscientific belief in the “tightness” of what is called “na- ture.” This is a form of idealism that causes untold misery, and has held back the progress of science _ for centuries. Unfortunately, many People today are victims of this idealistic thinking, especially with Tegard to physical sickness, nutri- tion, ete. It’s a very big subject. Allow me to comment only on ‘one aspect of it. A lot of progressive people, in- Cluding some I know well, have in Tecent years taken up one or an- Other dietry fad, in accordance With one or another “naturo- Pathic” theory. One central idea is that somehow or other “na- _ dinary foods, So we find our friends eating nuts, root vege- bles, soybeans, molasses, ete. Nature had little to do with these foods. They are all products _ %f highly advanced plant-breeding 8nd modern agriculture. Some of _ these foods have their place, _ Others are absolutely unfit for hu- _ ™an consumption. ‘ r example: “blackstrap mo- lasses”, eaten by hundreds of thousands on this continent, is “anned as unfit for human con- ‘Sumption in most civilized coun- _ tries. It is not a food but a waste Product. Many scientists| have - tritional values in jit, but it) ap- Pears to be nothing more than the Most impure product of a. sugar. ie refinery, the color being due most- s - to inedible residues and rust | rom the machinery. You might _ Wst as well drink the water from ‘8 cay radiator, as’a “source of iron.” ; s ynere is another, political aspect are ti® question. The best foods ae today nearly all very high- eed. Hundreds of quack “nu- . fonists” are again appearing, tice” did in the “hungry thir- _; > to extoll the wonders of eat- min “nature’s” foods: grass, ‘dried Sirga raw or boiled grains, cheap Sau, BETS, etc. The soybean is ma as “nature's super food.” _ et Ple f Course, this is pure and sim- Apne ™onopolist politics. Get peo- Heit ne that they will be Chea er if they eat the crudest, : mob foods, and they will ac- : rich the grim reality that only the A noe eat properly! Thus ridic- ne est fads, having not the slight- | Scientific basis, take hold of aieahe Progressive people, They can Newey the enemy when he Ries Vicious anti-peace editorial Mieco’ a slanderous moving pic- ag) but they accept the same tended for publication. It was a - . letter is often quite different to- ture's foods” are better than or- Tried: their best to. determine. nus of Dimes for crippled children if enemy’s teaching when it is dish- ed out in the shape of a “nature’s- way-is-best” fad. There are, of course, a great many refined foods sold to us to- day which should be sold in less refined form. But the human race could not exist on “nature’s foods” any more. grow enough food for us. The foods nature grows (which are, of course, the wild-growing foods) fare too crude, too lacking in food value, for human beings. One c? the greatest advances made in all man’s evolution was when -we stopped eating nature’s food and began growing and cooking our own foods, developed by the hu- man race, by the’ conquest of na- ture. : Mr. Fridleifson quotes that pro- fascist enemy of science, Carrel. If Mr. Fridleifson wants to see tens of millions of people who are using medical science, and who are not suffering from any in- crease in physical or mental dis- ease, but who on the contrary are rapidly lowering the incidence of all diseases, he should study the USSR. Socialism, and not a re- _turn to munching nuts and eating ‘factory wastes, is the answer to the disease problem in all capital- ist countries. The fight against the armament drive, and not a re- turn to gulping bowls of coarse cereals, is the answer to the high cost of food in Canada today. Progressives should think a lit- tle about this fact: There are no diet fads in the socialist world, and the only people living on what we call “diets’” are sick people, eating diets prescribed by nutri- tionists and physicians. The food goal of the socialist world is more milk and milk products, more meat of all kinds, more whole- grain products, a reasonable amount of refined sugars, and an increase in fruit consumption. And the Chinese people are gladly ex- changing their “super food”, soy- beans, for the finest grain ever de- veloped by man: wheat. The Pacific Tribune printed Dyson Carter’s first letter com- menting on this subject in the belief that it was intended for publication. The letter was sent in by a reader, Mrs. Cora Phil- lips, who explained that she had written to Dyson Carter suggest- ing that he write an article dealing with dietory fads, na- turopathy and related questions and had received the letter in reply. ; ee ‘ Give local wrestlers a chance, savs Bunka © GEORGE BUNKA, Vancouver, — B.C.: On March 18 local papers advertised a wrestling tournament to be held in Vancouver on March — 21 with the winner meeting the light heavyweight champion of the” world at a later date. I submitted my application to » the city Athletic Commission but Nature can’t. ou Dopantinent f ot Yio Dente. lacks the color necessary to the trade.” (See enclosed picture.) Parker prefers to forget that on June 20, 1944, I challenged Cliff Parker and Bill\Kohnke to wrestle me one after the other on the same evening with my entire purse go- ing to a suitable charity.” My challenge was never accepted. Parker prefers to forget that I am holder of the Western Canada middleweight championship won by myself in a tournament held here on March 28, 1945. On-January 27, 1940, Jerry Math- ison, provincial instructor of re- creational and physical education, stated: “He (Bunka) possesses a comprehensive ,technical know- ledge of this sport, his teaching Ss Not colorful enough? ‘ability is unsurpassed, whieh is very obvious when one knows that in a wrestling championship last spring, he produced six winners” in six different classes.” Now, is Parker being quite hon- est when he states that I haven’t the necessary color? Would I make the statements you read here if I wasn’t certain “that I could beat the world’s light heavy- weight champion? American boys come here week after week to wrestle. Local boys are being denied a chance to make a living in their own country. I challenge promoter Cliff Parker and matchmaker Tex Porter to give me a match with Andy Tre- maine, with the world’s light heavyweight championship at stake, and no substitutes. Wrestling fans, you are entitled to see this, match. Insist that this challenge be accepted. I guarantee you a wrestling match with no pulling of strings, and no dictating from Cliff Parker, Tex Porter or any other quarter. Superior way of life. is bound fo prevail ROY REID, Rabbit Lake, Sas- _katchewan: Conflicting ideas that was, refused. I was further advis- arise and grow out of the conflict ed by promoter Cliff Parker that any attempt on my part to .step into the ring and challenge any wrestler in this tournament would result in legal action against my- self. FASE a. On March 24 I announced through the sport pages of the Vancouver Sun that I would do-— nate my entire purse to the March © allowed to participate in this show. | The press failed to Announce, how- — ever, that if I was beaten I would forfeit an additional $50 to be donated to the March of Dimes. — In the same article, Parker was quoted as saying that “Bunka « between two different social sys- tems are not to be settled by war. Whether there is a third world war or not, in the end the conflict ‘of ideas arising out of the differ- _ing property relations in the USSR from property relations in the United States will be decided in peaceful competition on the basis of their merits. If collective own- ership proves in practice to be “more in the interests of the ma- jority of the people than private property, then in the long run the new social system will. displace ‘the old social system, as surely as tractor power farming will super- ‘cede horse power farming, © »make them pay. The autobiography ’ of a working woman “Some seed fell on good ground and brought forth fruit’—Matt XIII, 8 Edited by MARGARET FAIRLEY fi Beeinnne her story last week, the author told of her child- hood in the Lancashire town of Wigan — born in a workhouse, maltreated by foster parents, aban- doned and then placed in a Dr. ' Barnado’s Home. When she was 10 years old she was shipped out to a farm in Canada and event- ually shipped back to England again as “‘‘incorrigible.”’ For a few years she was “‘in service” in Lon- don and then she returned to Wigan again, there to find a job in a tailor’s sweat-shop and share the life of a worker in that most exploited of all trades—the needle trades industry. CHAPTER 3 ETWEEN 1910 and 1914 there was a great movement of peo- ple from England to Canada. Widespread unemployment was one reason why emigration was encouraged. And the new railways across Canada needed people to I, knowing no- thing of these reasons, joined the throng of girls who came to Can- ada under the system of ,bonding. Our passage money was advanced on the understanding that we had to stay in our first job until it was repaid. The system was well call- ed bonding. I was about twenty when I came back to Canada. Like all the emigrant girls of my age, I dream- ed of a nice home of my own. I have always dreamed of this, and I think it is, in our time and country at any rate, the most last- ing dream of women young and old. There are many, many wo- men to whom it remains a dream till they die. I try to persuade myself that I have given up hop- ing, and if you were to ask me I should say that I have no hope, but I do not think it would be quite true. I travelled steerage of course. It was like all my life so far, the ‘crowding and smells and lack of privacy and comfort which was considered good enough for peo- ple like me. I was so used to it. that I hardly noticed it. We didn’t actually see how comfortable the ‘second and first class passengers were, but sometimes I caught the eye of one of them as she looked down over the railing of the up- _ per deck at our semi-squalid con- ditions, and I wondered what she was thinking. I have talked with |some of these luckier people since, and I know that they were trou- bled by doubts about the justice of it all. When we landed gat Quebec we were. hired out, not unlike the slaves of old. I was immédiately taken by the wife of a Senator. As soon as I entered her door, before ‘I was shown my room, I. was shown where the broom was kept, and told to begin to clean. I clean- ed day after day, month after month until my passage money “was earned, ‘This was the first of a long line of other women’s houses Which I have cleaned and cleaned in Can- ada. As soon as the terms of my bond allowed, I left my Quebec employer without warning, and found my way to Montreal. In Quebec I had no opportunity to make friends, and I had no books. Life in the Wigan sweat- shop had been rich in compari- son, and by now I knew the value of companionship and reading. I was hungry for both. But I have never really learned how to make friends; something has stood in the way. I think I have learned instead how to pass a friendly word with people I meet casually on the street or in the stores, and I hope this has helped them as much as it has helped me. It has been a sort of substitute for friendship. But my hunger’ for the real things has remained unsatisfied and is with me still. As for books, that has been a different story, which I will tell something of later, a story of hunger satisfied and re- born again and again. When I came to Montreal (it must have been in about 1913) I found it very difficult to get work. I was appalled at the conditions which lured so many girls like me into prostitution. I found another means of escape, but I take no credit for that. It was not the fault of the girls, but it came through their poverty and unem- ployment, their helplessness in the face of people who could get money out of their life, and the complete indifference of society. to their very existence. ; iy When I read about countries of the new world, the world of so- cialism, what touches and ‘appeals to me most is the picture of a so- ¢ cial life when every single indiy- idual is needed and encouraged ,and wanted. And when I hear of our “freedom of the individual”, I see the waifs and strays of Wig- an and Liverpool, the soldiers’ wives of England and America, the prostitutes of Montreal, In Montreal I lived for a time with a kind employment official, who gave me a roof over my head in return for housework. But that could not go on indefinitely; I had sto find some means of sup- ‘port. There was no work to be found, so I answered an advertise- ment in the matrimonial column of a paper. I was, in the only way I could think of, reaching out for lifent. 54 Fes This was, for me, the only answer I could think of to the problem forced on me by the emigration scheme which ‘had brought me to Canada. When I hear about fresh emigration plans I think of lonely children and young people tossed on’ to ships and out of ships from shore to ‘shore, useful “hands” for farmers or munition makers, to be per- _ haps in a few years unwanted and — unvalued. And if I felt lonely, — what must be the suffering of those who come unable to speak a word of English? : So, through the columns of a _ newspaper, I found a husband. On- this I will say no more. I was desperate for life, and this was my road, perhaps the only road I could have taken. In my two sons and one daughter I at last experi- enced life; I gave and I received; : they were unique in my life, and I in theirs, “ (To be continued) ‘PACIFIC TRIBUNE — APRIL 20, 1951 — Page 11