Gold road A mining company receives bad. news over access to the Iskut Valley\NEWS AS Overcrowded Facelift wanted Minor hockey registrations are running close the maximum capacity\SPORTS B6 | Farmers market backers want the city to spruce things up\COMMUNITY B3 WEDNESDAY _ AUGUST 14, 1996 ANDARD : 93¢ PLUS 7¢ GST VOL. 9 NO. 18 Buyouts muddy merger waters By JEFF NAGEL BIG BUYOUT provisions contained in the contracts of senior administrators shouldn’t dictate who will end up in charge of the newly-merged Terrace and Kitimat school districts. That’s the position Kitimat trustees are taking as they pressure their School Dis- trict 88 counterparts to get together and decide who’s in and who’s out. It’s an issue because at least two of Terrace's senior administrators — super- intendent Frank Hamilton and assistant superintendent Skip Bergsma — have lucrative contracts requiring they be paid full salary for the term of the contract if terminated before they expire. Hamilton and Bergsma both earn more than $100,000 a year and each bas a five-year deal with the school district. But the contracts are automatically tolled over each year so they never ex- pire. This means a combined payout in the $1 million range should their employment ever be terminated by the school district, A three-year version of the contract force for most Terrace principals, vice- principals and other board-office admin- istrators. Terrace trustee and transition com- mittee co-chair Stew Christensen told a meeting in Terrace last week that one of the key goals in deciding which staff members to keep will be to ‘keep to terminate the Kitimat administrators and keep the more expensive Terrace of- ficials, Kitimat trustee Peter King opposes that logic. “You should pick the best person for the job — not just die person with the biggest buyout provision,’’ he said. The Kitimat board, by contrast, invited a wide cross-section of the community to its budget deliberations. Although that sometimes makes government less efficient — Terrace irustee John Pousette points out that Kitimat’s effort to get consensus meant it didn’t file its budget on time with Vic- severance costs toa minimum.” Kitimat administrators are on three- year contracts, that are evaluated and renewed in the final year. That means it will be significantly with automatic annual extension is in cheaper for the new amalgamated board g Tricky! ASKATEBOARD PARK need not be just for skaters. At least that’s the view of pe-yearold Rick Koelemy, whose cycle-sport known as freestyle uses many. of the same ramps and curves as skateboarders. Koelemy would like to see a park built to encourage young people to get involved In his fast-growing sport. King says Kitimat administration have developed a more consultalive, consensus-building style than their Ter- Tace counterparts. “Terrace has a system where they say write us a letter and we'll take it under advisement,’’ King said, toria — King defends the practice, He says the Kitimat style is less con- frontational and more productive than the Terrace’s, “People are a little bit scared of losing that,’' he explained, Cont'd Page A10 Amalgamation vote unlikely IT’S LOOKING MORE and more like one of the area’s most highly-debated issues won't be put before the voters this year. The issue is amalgamating Terrace and Thornhill and local officials had hoped a referendum sccking voter approval would have been put to the voters by now. Then, _ provided,..amalagamation was approved, “council ‘elections ‘for the new government structure would take place with other local elections this November. But the provincial government has yet to give the Kitimat-Stikine regional district its financial incentive package for the amal- gamation so it can be prepared and present- ed to voters ina referendum. ‘“We were looking at two windows of op- portunity,”’ says regional district economic development manager Andrew Webber. “One was in the Spring of 96, and the other was in September. We were really hoping for September, but it’s too late now."” Webber says that even if the offer came through today, there would not be enough time to inform the public about what the restructure package was all about so people could make an informed decision, “September is definitely out,’’ he says. Webber's even pessimistic that.an amal- gamation referendum can even be readied in time for the regular November local elec- tions. “It's possible,” says Webber. ‘‘But doing both restructure and elections at the same time could be confusing for people,”’ The exorbitant fength of time the govern- ment has taken to present its financial in- centive package has some people in the regional district frustrated. “They keep promising that it’s coming,’ says Thornhill director Peggy Julseth. ‘‘But they don’t deliver. They told us well over two weeks ago that it would be ready for sure in two weeks and it’s not here. It was just another empty promise.”’ Julseth says that the government has given the regional district.a peek at little pieces of the offer that look enticing, but they haven’t seen anything substantial. “Its a litte discouraging when they pump you up with ideas that iv] be a good Cont'd Page A2 MLA will wait for word on forest bank bucks NDP SKEENA MLA Helmut Giesbrecht is going lo wait until next month before inaking up his mind about the controversy surrounding the size of Forest Renewal B.C.’s (FRBC) bank account. The provincial crown corporation collects a special fee from forest companies that's to be put back into the forests and related activities. But FREC has been tucking more away than it is spending and a cash-poor — and very hungry — provincial government is toying with the idea of tapping the amount. As it is, FRBC should have $900 million in the bank by next year. And it’s already moved $400 million to a safe place to buff- er future shortfalis should they occur. FRBC’s problems began when the government began collecting the fees from the forest companies without first having a system in place to spend the money. The opposition Liberals are telling the provincial government not to touch the cash unless itis for forest activities. Giesbrecht said he’s content to wait for a decision from the FRBC board which meets next month. ‘There are unions, forest companies, First Nations and environmental groups on the board. It’s up to them,’ he said last week, The MLA said he’s been getting mixed reviews from northerners on what to do, “It depends on peoples’ priorities,’ Gies- brecht added of the comments. “If some could be used for hospital fund- ing, perhaps that’s not so bad,’’ he said. Giesbrecht was one of 10 NDP MLAs targeted last week by the opposition Liber- als who challenged them to vote against any plan to raid the FRBC account, “'The government has a slim majority in the legislature. It takes only three NDP backbenchers to stop the plunder of Forest Renewal funds,’’ said Liberal forest critic Ted Nebbeling. Giesbrecht said the Liberal tactic is one way being used by the opposition to keep the issue alive. “These are the same guys who didn't want a freeze on capital projects and then say we should spend less,” he said, Fed fish group needs gutting says MP WITH FISHERIES on both coasts in decline, it’s time to iake a knife and start gutting the Department of Fisheries and Oceans, That’s the conclusion Skeena MP Mike Scott has reached. The Reform fisheries crilic is preparing a report on the state of the commercial fishery in Canada, and says he is con- vinced the industry is over-managed and over-subsidized, ‘The commercial fishery is a net loss fo the Canadian economy,’ Scott said last week. ‘“When you take into account the amount of monney we spend as a na- tion of fishery management through DFO, when you take into account the amount of money spent by fishermen, and the subsidies provided to people in the commercial fishing industry, add it all up and then subtract the commercial value of the catch, it’s a net loss to the economy,”’ Canada spends $750 million a year managing the resource and stations 1,000 of its 6,000 full-time DFO employees in Oltawa, he added. Stacked up against other fishing na- tions, Canada’s system doesn’t look elfi- clent. Scott says. “Something's wrong,”? mon that we’ve been experiencing,’’ tawa and Victoria is designed to give the province more say in fisheries manage- Scott says that for every metric tonne of fish landed by Norwegian fishermen, that country spends $85 on fisheries itanagement, Canada, on the other hand, spends $455 on fisheries management for every tonne landed. “In the face of this massive expendi- ture and this huge bureaucracy we have neither been able to predict nor prevent the collapse of the Atlantic ground fish or the severe decline of the Pacific sal- “We've got to gct away from the no- tion that we should pay peaple to fish,”’ he said. Scott expects to finish his report by inid-September, He says he believes the Pacific fishery would be better managed if the legions of Department of Fisheries and Oceans bureaucrats in Ottawa were replaced by people closer to the resource, An agreement signed last month by Ot- ment. But Scott says it docsn’t address the bloated Ottawa bureaucracy or the vast distance between it and where the fish actually are, ’ Scott said fish farms are now account- ing for about 30 per cent of the fish caught in Canada, and says their success could mean jobs on the north coast if the feds loosen up the red tape on such oper- ations,