‘

| daboacd from \t, _

Th. the cdnaart ot aStessed yvolues a the louse

a exackl y average, with Five properties above

ot in Volue , ond Cive below, The louse ts
EA,5 Fo oF the asccesed average value , vote
than the veg ured 90 70. The dAitevence befwoenr
the two Percentages 1s fawly small. My point
1S that even though he louse doesn + exakly
Weert the by law's Cov mula, it 1S congruent
with the bylaws intent aud purpose , T Leel |
Hast it deserves wa special look @ Ven Hre €ollowing
CE\S cumstances. |

Firstly , vt Sees woulte to me thet te

AS4e56ed value at the old locosttion is considered |

rather than f te potential Value at thre Weuw/
location. For example, this house is being
Moved Crom an area thet iS expond\ug as aw
indust «tal site, to OM AN OA. thea: AS. expanding
0S a vesidentiaol aven., T+ should be. worth
Wove. i an aven o€ other houses vathou thon
an aven ef Warelouses and ndustyry « Sn
Also, ia the Pvocess 0 moving alouse, it iS,
poseilale to either add: ov detvact Leow uns. value
w iT is Eimally established on ts new «ite,
TE Taw alleued fo move this. house. Lill
Upgrade ond ad +o its value. IW. may USOYS «
Bum ay of toe ero posed IMmpVove ment S tS
Tam Sony Hrak precise plans. ane.not..
prepared ag DL oo uot yet own tHe heuse cand
TC recewed less than AH hours notice..to. plepave.
This proposal , Un tov tinately Fime 16 0€ the.
CSSEnCe | aS fhe owner \S aMxlous to Qo ahead
WNW Lis own project and the louse. Faces