For Alan and Kay Inglis, the two-week trip to Vietnam during April and May revealed a country that, however poor, ‘‘is vibrant and full of hope.”’ But it also revealed that war and the threat of war which, 14 years ago, prompted the Inglises to found Canadian Aid for Viet- nam Civilians, is still very much a part of the life and the landscape of Vietnam. In Hanoi, in the north, the bomb shelters that were carved into the streets during the long U.S. war and covered in follow- ing liberation in the south, have again been reopened. But this time, they are there in the event of Chinese attack — a grim reminder of the unholy alliance between China and the previous aggressor. New Economic Zones, Viet- namese farmers struggle to establish a dairy cattle industry in an area that has been barren since the U.S. troops left. Once a lush rubber plantation it was denuded by American defoliants in a savage, futile effort to break the strength of the National Libera- tion Front. Although the Inglises made the trip to discuss orders and delivery of the Vietnamese furniture and handicraft which they import, most of the time went to reaffirm bonds of friendship that went back to the establishment of CAVC in 1966. __ Hosting them during their stay was the Vietnam Women’s, Union, the 10-million member organization headed by Nguyen Thi Dinh, the diminutive woman who was second in command of the Armed Forces of National Liberation in South Vietnam dur- ing the U.S. war. They visited the offices of the Red Cross in Hanoi to be greeted by Dr. Nguyen Van Tin who, for 14 years has distributed the more than half a million dollars in aid And in the south in one of the | Reality of war still a part of Vietnam's life the CAVC has sent; and the Viet- nam Peace Committee whose president, Phanh Anh, honored Alan Inglis with an award on behalf of the Vietnam Committee of Friendship and Solidarity with the Peoples of All Countries. Fittingly, it paid him tribute for “actively supporting and assisting the Vietnamese people in the struggle for independence, freedom and national reconstruc- - tions? At Tien Son, site of a new hospital, they saw tangible evidence of CAVC aid..In 1978, $50,000 was sent to help equip the hospital and the equipment was in place when they visited the new facility. Another $18,000 in equipment was purchased on their way through Hong Kong. “The hospital is pretty spartan by our standards,”’ Allan remem- bers, ‘‘but the ministry of health has done well using what ‘ resources were available.”’ The Inglises’ only regret is that the federal Canadian Interna- tional Development Agency was to have matched the CAVC donation with its own grant, saw fit instead to cut off further aid to Vietnam following the overthrow: of the Pol Pot regime in Kam- puchea. Phan Anh, president of the Vietnam Peace Committee (left), * te turns the friendship award over to Kay and Alan Inglis. The award was in honor of Inglis’ work as chairman of CAVC. Significantly, that decision by the Canadian government was made at a time when Vietnam fac- ed food shortages as a result not only of the. aggression from China but also massive flooding and storm damage to crops. But that too, the Vietnamese endured. ‘“We were concerned about the food shortages,’’ Alan and Kay affirm, ‘‘but everywhere the Viet- namese told us simply that famine has been averted, that the pro- blems of food shortages, par- ticularly grain, have been over- come.”’ Alan Inglis poses with Vietnam Red Cross vice-president Dr. Nguyen Van Tin (r), outside the Red Cross offices in Hanoi, from which most of the CAVC aid was distributed. And, again at peace — albeit a precarious peace broken periodically, by Chinese border provocations — the Vietnamese are concentrating on reconstruc- tion, the Inglises say. Even on the border areas, “many of which were devastated during the Chinese invasion — a . devastation which Alan’s slides graphically documents’ — the rebuilding has begun. “The people who farm there are also the defenders,”’ Kay says, adding that the older people and ohers have been moved out to en- sure their safety. She also remembers that they met one woman whose husband was killed during the invasion. ‘‘I think she would have moved right up to the border-and lived there and worked,”’ she says. ‘There is no question — no one is going to move the Viet- namese people. They’re going to dig in.”’ From the northern border area, the Inglis’ trip took them to the other end of the country, to Ho Chi Minh City, formerly Saigon; to kindergartens, and textile co-operatives; to Cap St. Jacques, once the resort area for the U.S. military and the site of massive U.S: defoliation intend- - edto protect a huge ammunition dump; and to rehabilitation cen- _ tres treating former prostitutes and drug addicts, the names of which translate quaintly as ‘“‘the Centre for the building of new women’? and ‘‘centre for building new youth.”’ ; At one of these centres, Kay was surprised to find Catholic sisters working with the women. Later they were to find that is the case in much of south Vietnam — that the nuns (although not necessarily the official church) work willingly with the govern- ment in helping to build a socialist society. The difficulties in building that © new society were apparent to the Inglises: the bomb shelters that are a constant reminder of the threat from China that did not go away when the troops withdrew; the aid programs promised by the | West but blocked by new cold war attitudes. ; The country is very poor, Kay adds, in part because of the aid it: has given to other countries, not- ably Kampuchea — aid which the } press here has only just begun to acknowledge has been provided for months. ‘But even if it is poor, you can see it is a vibrant country, full of hope.”’ - —Sean Griffin ie oo premade Newly-founded cultural alliance aims at a national organization PETERBOROUGH, Ont. —° ‘*Art for arts sake, and Fred’s and * Jill’s and Dominic’s, Art for peo- ple’s sake,”’ read the reporton art criticism at the founding conven- ° tion of the Cultural Workers Al- liance. It was an historic occasion here in Peterborough, May 17 and 18 as 86 artists and cultural workers ga- thered at the founding convention of the new organization. The meeting itself proved once again that artists are not self-em- ployed individuals ‘‘who do their own thing.’’ Artists, the conven- tion pointed out, are like others in Canadian society who find them- selves struggling against the same enemy, the state and monopolies of Canada. This was brought out in both po- sition papers and the final docu- ment of aims and objectives of CWA. Artists, whether visual, in theatre, literature or journalism pointed out that the main source of money for the arts is the govern- ment, be it through the Canada Council, CBC or other agencies, provincial or federal. But at the same time, the artists recognized they have a direct link with all working and oppressed peoples in Canada. There is a direct link it was noted with the “technical and support workers”’ i.e. people: employed in galleries, museums, television, etc., whose work is directly related to the arts. Several delegates mentioned the recent organizing of the Art Gallery of Ontario and recognized the AGO workers connection to the ar- tists whose work is (and isn’t) ex- hibited there. The artist’s responsibility to the peoples of Canada to support them in their struggles ‘‘for better condi- PACIFIC TRIBUNE—MAY 30, 1980—Page 10 tions of life and work”’ was also highlighted. The problem of censorship was dealt with extensively. On one hand the state uses censorship to sup- press progressive and anti-monop- oly culture. On the other hand to- tally opposing censorship would be tantamount to allowing racist, sex- ist and other reactionary cultural expressions. The convention adopted the principle of opposing censorship in principle while at the same time be- ing wholly opposed to reactionary culture regardless of its source. With the exception of Millie Lamb of the Nellie McClung Wo- men’s Theatre in Winnipeg, the delegates were from Ontario and Quebec. CWA noted this short- coming and aid plans to expand rapidly across Canada to become a truly country-wide organization of artists and cultural workers. : —J.K. Peterborough. Delegates to the Cultural Workers Alliance founding conference in ;