A quick guide to fast write-offs Purposes, business- mitted man ons tha ‘many exemp- eamer. t are denied the wage- For tax ek are per 1 One of : Or, as th them is depreciation— € income t. calls. j C ax department it—capital cost allowance —~Oor Write-off. - And n the fast write-off. ow we have ro i : aus businessman’s point a TF he ereciation makes Michine € buys a building, a tal oe ae truck, that’s a capi- ie. iture (an addition to Sets xpensec and not an expense. and » Such as rent, wa deduetey {0° that truck’ can “be he caleula rom his profit before OWever, tha machi asset chine co ) depreci Mes © legs ve Rae ear and Obsolesce n 0% a year, c (or be- through by, say, nethods of (There are several tion Oth calculating deprecia- Per year , 2" by percentage allows sen the government Purposes. 1S method for tax At 10 Preci a $1,000 machi = he by $100 the ieee ‘ ee year, and so on, a St valuable service hisses... Sidere depreciation is then con- dedu N expense and may be 8 Profit before cal- of the 4 because that achine j i 0 have bea 1S consid- e the cha depar i grin ists, make N used up. - tment, much to . 8ccounting pur- Sit possible to write es * Committee ‘al House of Commons on ond prices. seems Ms P various cans Proceeg, *S their investigation Price ‘i ut Meanwhile the Steadily. od Continues to climb 0 Statistics Can- in the Toronto : : est prices in anu, 7% high higher, we Pork ee nae have fish and 3 high- @ j n 187, Meteased 179 sin ries Back Spec;., &t the . Wag = Commit peatines of the Presiq ra by ee filets we the Grocer aoe’ Ee een acturers of ees Fe Bae that the Serarne Conant » CONnsider “income food 5 sos than price Ho etices eee of keeping Pathe, this wo; | Teal mae tinteligi help seems | Wa at of €, but the Steele’s remarks © companies eq i : ; » said Writ Ss ij willing to e 1 teeg: Nese 1 Profits to under- diy, throug, ("come guaran- ‘dy compat igher taxes. In- leyeg Od try to.) WOuld in all Bes ° maintain profit they’re in the & add Prise, ed to no Other aad Consumer erds, any benefit “onsumer would y Swallowed seo get in one - Nave a gnaw- 2 10), that none hc Said » Which represents off a machine in fewer years than it takes to wear it out. This, says the government, stimulates business by encourag- ing the purchase of new ma- chinery sooner than would otherwise be the case. What this does, too, is give business addi- tional profit because it can charge this exaggerated depre- ciation as an expense, deductible from profit. Picture an outfit like Massey-Ferguson with its inter- national banks of machinery en- joying this tremendous write-off. The latest move (promised last May and scheduled to be voted on in Parliament any day now) is to introduce fast, two-year write-off, thus permitting mono- polies gigantic tax exemptions for expenses which they have not yet incurred — won’t incur for years. In other words—in- stant profits. This way the monopolies pay even less of their share of the tax load — and the people pay more. A story carried by Nippon Steel News in July 1972 describ- ing the success at Nippon Steel’s Kawasaki Works in _ chasing pigeons away with a recording of crows cawing has had inter- national repercussions. More than 200 letters from over the world have been receiv- ed asking for phonosheet copies of the recording, and many reci- pients have followed up to re- port they also have met with success, re spending abroad far more of 25 billion dollars a year. THE MONEY CRISIS —\ oly pricing push- This has two rather obvious effects. First is that the excess money generated by the U.S. shows up in other countries and imposes infla- es there, rather than in the U.S. itself. The Exchange market anarchy By EMIL BJARNASON The second of three articles Proponents of Nixon’s policies hold that foreigners lost confidence in the U.S. dollar because its value was undermined by domes- tic inflation in the United States. Therefore, the remedy is to restore confidence by reduc- ing the rate of inflation. Further, they hold that inflation is caused by monop ed by excessive wage gains. Therefore, the cure for inflation is to stop prices and wages from rising, by administrative controls. The irrationality of this approach is imme- diately apparent when one observes that the rate of inflation has been consistently higher in Germany and Japan — the countries with strong currencies—than in the United States. This has been and continues to be true in spite of the fact that U.S. government policy is the biggest cause of inflation everywhere. Since the nineteen fifties, the U.S. govern- ment has been spending more than its income, largely for military purposes and: subsidies to monopolies. The difference between income and outgo has been covered by the printing of money — inflation, pure and simple. But simultaneously, the U.S. has also been than what it re- ceives from abroad. The difference — called the balance of payments deficit — is made up of an excess of imports over exports, gov- ernment loans and subsidies to friendly or dominated states, and the investments of U.S. “international corporations” in foreign coun- tries. This deficit, more or less steadily grow- ing, has reached the proportions, under Nixon, ates anarchy other is that tremendous accumulations of U.S. dollars have appeared in foreign coun- tries. These accumulations, referred to as Eurodollars, are now estimated at over $75- billion. At least half of this amount is in private hands, largely in the hands of foreign branches of U.S, international corporations. By the ordinary rules of capitalism, every holder of money seeks to use it profitably. If he believes that German marks are going to rise in value relative to the dollar, simple business prudence will cause him to switch to marks. If the rate of interest on money is higher in France than in England, ordinary horse sense will lead the holders of money to transfer it to France. These motives tend to affect all sneculators simultaneously. Thus the simple, old fashioned profit motive gener- in the market, in the face of all the government regulation and control which for the past generation was believed to have overcome the contradictions of free enterprise. Nixonomics did not cure inflation in the USA. The rate of increase in the Consumer Price Index fell off a bit, but this is decep- tive. Prices reflected: in the index were held down, -but the excess money generated by | Nixon’s policies simply asserted itself in other areas. Canadian lumber exporters, for exam- ple, have experienced a 100% increase in the price received from the U.S. market during the period of the so-called freeze. Nixonomics put heavy penalties on imports into the U.S. and subsidized exports. None- theless, the trade deficit increased. A country which had not experienced a commodity trade deficit for 80 years suddenly found it- self buying $5-billion more goods than it sold — precisely in the period of controls designed to produce an export surplus. international money Food corporations ‘innocent’ or awenssssse tee dairy processors, but not farm- ers. The dairymen said a “whole host”. of new government regu- lations applying to food quality, in-plant safety, labelling of pro- ducts and industrial pollution has contributed to rising costs. The arrogance of the food in- dustry was shown by the presi- dent of the Canadian Food Pro- cessors’ Association, L. H. John- ston, who refused to give mem- bers’ sales figures to the special committee. Lobby Group This was too much even for the Liberals and Tories. Allan Lawrence (PC), said Johnston’s inability or refusal to divulge figures makes _ it hard for the public to take seriously the food industry’s claims that it faces “keen competition.” And James Fleming (L), called the associa- TRIBUNE PHOTO tion, which represents most ma- jor Canadian processors of fruit and vegetables “just another lobby group.” Committee member Grace MacInnis (NDP) presented the real picture. During the most recent fiscal years available, Do- minion Stores showed profits up 188.0% over the previous year, Steinberg’s profits: up 47.4% and Oshawa Wholesale up 24.6%. The Canadian Grocery Dis- tributors’ Institute, grouping big supermarket chains and small independent food retailers across the country, when confronted with the figures, asked the com- mittee to realize their members do not ‘make the prices.” Well, somebody does, but it certainly isn’t the shopper, who sees his food bill spiral up every time he visits the local super- market. The Canada-USSR_ Associa- tion announces that organized groups in cities across Canada have responded favorably to the holding of a conference to pro- mote Canada-USSR amity. The conference will be held in Toronto on the weekend of March 24-25, 1973, at the Can- ada-USSR Association Centre, 55 Bloor St. E., suite 404, in the heart of central Toronto. “We believe that you share our conviction that the holding of such a conference is an ur- gent need,” says the Association announcement, ‘‘and that it will be an advantage for all to meet together, exchange experiences and plan united efforts to ex- tend the scope and effectiveness of our common purpose.” The conference takes place in a period ripe for the extension of such activities. The signing of accords between the Govern- ment of Canada and the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics, has created a new climate. More and more Canadians in English and French speaking Canada are indicating readiness to appre- ciate the value of increasing understanding and promoting normal relations between our two countries. The organizers foresee in the conference deliberations and proposals, the formulation of a program for future work, adop- tion of a constitution and elec- tion of a Council and Executive Committee. Association’s Activities The Canada-USSR_ Associa- tion was formed more than a decade ago. At that time, mem- bers and friends of the Associa- tion were convinced that the achievement of normal relation- ships between the people of Canada and the people of the Union of Soviet Socialist Repub- lics was in the interests of Can- ada and the cause of world peace. The conviction has been confirmed by the signing of ac- cords between Canada and the USSR. Aims and objectives stated by the Association include extend- ing and strengthening ties of friendship and understanding between citizens of Canada and citizens of the USSR, and the provision of information on all aspects of Soviet life, as well as the promotion of knowledge of Canada among organizations with comparable aims in the USSR. The encouragement of cultur- al exchanges between the two countries, and making available to Canadians, Soviet films, books, and exhibitions, are part of the work of the Canada-USSR Association. +i a PACIFIC TRIBUNE—FRIDAY, MARCH 16, 1973—-PAGE 9