LESLIE MORRIS OUND Labor Day there Will come on sale a new “about Canada: Anatomy mpusiness, by. L. C. W. Park. It is being shed by Progress Books ill sell for $5 in a *s0und edition and $2.75 my readers of the Pacific me will remember the S book, The Power and rOney, which was pub- in 1958 and told the “Of the big monopolies © enormous wealth gives he power to run the --in their own inter: ginally, the Parks meant kK on a second edition heir first book, but as ibject grew in size and ance and the crisis of mada deepened, they found ves with a new ‘book. S a powerful indict- Of the men who own da. They are not Cana- in the main, but Amer- But what the Parks With a wealth of facts figures, is to show that Canadian tycoons not are willing partners of Americans, but that even Pendent” operators they : the American game. 1 they appear to be “‘in-- ’ We refer here, of course, to the big shots* men who know that a mfion dollars is no longer just capftal, but power. The small business: man might. often have a more Canadian outlook, but he is at the mercy of the masters of finance. The authors make clear that the U.S. domination of Canada was made _ possible through the growth of mon- opoly, the development of monopoly capitalism. That is a real contribution to the knowledge of Canada: it shows that the fight for Canadian national develop- ment, free from U.S. con- trol, is actually the fight against the power of mono- poly capital. One is insepar- able from the other. The Parks describe the words “ownership” and ‘‘con- trol.’ They are really the same thing: “The power of the upper layer of the ruling class is based on their control of capital and the means of production, the control in turn resting upon direct ‘ownership of only a fraction of the total capital con- trolled.” Readers of the book wiil gain a better grasp of the way the US. corporations (about 25 of them, operating in Canada) extend their grip through the whole of the economic and political life of our country. Again and again the point is made, and proved, that there is really ‘cone lump” of monopoly capital in Canada, a powerful U.S. - Canadian financial oligarchy whose operations actually define the shape and content of mono. poly capital in Canada. There are not two big piles of capital, one American and the other Canadian, but only one—U.S,-Canadian. U.S. domination of Canada is defined as “the sum of U.S. influence (the influence of the dominant U.S. finan- cial groups) over the Cana- dian economy and the Cana- dian government, an in- fluence that is partially in- dicated by the huge volume of U.S. investment in Canada and by the interlocking of U.S. and Canadian financial groups.” The Parks say, rightly, that “not every U.S. influ- ence on Canada has been bad,” and so they strike a blow against narrow-minded nationalism, village-pumpism which gets in the way of the fight for Canadian independ- ence. : They emphasize this im- portant idea by showing that “the point is that in the world of today, with the U.S. government seeking by every means possible to maintain its short-lived period of world leadership, the expan- sion of U.S. influence in anatomy of BIG a > = > ~ °o zx < ° = eo o e = " 4 ~~ “ = Canada is preventing Canadian governments, them- selves linked with big busi- ness, from taking. effective steps to preserve the nation- al identity of Canada and de- velop Canada on the basis cf Canadian needs.” : The Parks refuse to be drawn into the position of separating economics from politics, the favorite dodge of capitalist-minded econom.- ists. They understand that politics is concentrated eco- nomics. And so, through the book, they argue with the spokes- men and defenders of the present set-up, show James Coyne’s weaknesses as well as his strength, expose the current Liberal favorite, Walter Gordon, and in the final chapter of the book, describe better than has yet been done the case for na- - tionalzation. There can be no effective approach to Canada’s econo- mic problems, short of na- tionalization; all other medi- cines fail to treat the disease. The parks say: “The results of tycoon rule are becoming clearer as the problems of Canada become more acute. The one-sided partnership with U.S. capital that the ty- coons have worked for and which has become the basis for government policy, is also the basis for the threat to Canadian independence and Canadian economic develop- ment. . ew book indispensable to Labor “Tt is this whole line of action and its consequences that have to be challenged; it is the sale of Canada that has to be stopped. Canadian independence cannot be sec- ure, the economy: of Canada cannot grow, until ownership -and control of the key sec- tors of the Canadian economy is in Canada. “Not until then can there be a national approach to Canadian problems.” Then, and only then, can we have an east-west oil pipeline. And only then, the Parks show, can Canada have a power-grid which will make proper and economic use of our power resources all across the country. Only then will Canada’s iron ore be used as the found- ation along with our coal, for an industrial establishment that will make Canada a modern industrial country and not a parts depot and branch assembly plant for the USA. As we have said, the book is filled with facts. You will find out just who are the big Canadian capital- ists and what are their ties with the USA. You will know who runs the banks and how the maze of interconnections places the whole economy at the mercy of a small oligarchy of top financiers — a specially use- less class who are the domin- ating force in_ capitalist politics. There are good tables and, happily, graphic charts. Trade union bargaining committees should all have a copy of this book so they can know with whom they are dealing, because the real boss is not always the person he appears to be, but somebody else, far removed from the factory. Trade union education in Canada is sorely neglected. We need to get back to the time when classes in econo- mics _ (working-class econo- mics!) were held in local unions, and even during lunch-periods. 'The. Parks’. book is a manual of practical Cana- dian economics indispensable to Canadian labor. Know your opponent by reading the Parks’ new book.. We owe these gifted writ- ers a vote of thanks for their many selfless labors on be- half of Canada and _ her people. est Germany’s De- fence Minister Strauss recently made a demand for ‘equal rights” for his Hitler generals, ‘especially in the vital field of nuclear weapons.” He made it in an article in the Hamburg paper Welt am Sonntag, in. which he declared that ‘a: military alliance with in- tegrated armed forces and a joint strategic doctrine” was a necessity for “the security” of Europe and America. ; “The importance and danger of nuclear weap- ons requires carefully harmonized planning and effective control,” he con- tinued. ; W. Germany: ‘Equal rights’ “The joint defense sys- tem must give all NATO members not only theore- tically equal rights and_ duties, but especially in the vital field of nuclear. weapons it must also make the condition of partner- ship possible for them ac- cording to their capacity,” The minister said the contributions of NATO members must be in “a reasonable and_ suitable proportion”, adding that: West Germany must con- tinue to be prepared to make an appropriate con- tribution that would serve the joint security, not the building of a German military power. —Kugust 31, 1962—PACIFIC TRIBUNE—Page 7