/8. September 23rd, 1974

Plan.Off.re From the Planning Officer, September i9th, 1974, recommending. that
App1n.R#22-74

Application R#22274 for a "Development Area" designation on 5 lots at 2351-
2389 Bury Street, presently zoned RM~2 (Medium-Density Apartment Residential)
to allow a 43-unit condominium apartment development be approved, subject to
off-site servicing to be approved by the City Engineer.

Moved by Alderman Keryluk:

Seconded by Alderman Ranger: oo

That as recommended in a report from the Planning Officer, Saptember 19th,

1974, Application R#22-74 to rezone:

Lot 1, Block 4, D.L. 379, Plan 1213;

5. 128' Lot 2, Block 4, D.L. 379, Plan 1213;

Lot A, Block 4, D.L. 379, Plan 17571;

Lot C, Block 4, D.L. 379, Plan 20063; and

Lot D, Block 4, D.L. 379, Plan 20063
located at 2351-2389 Bury Street, from RM-2 (Medium Density Apartment
Residential) to "Development Area" to permit a 43-unit condominium apartment
development project to be developed under a Land Use Contract -be approved
subject to off-site servicing te be approved by the City Engineer. Carried.

Prior to passage of the above-stated resolution, Mr. W. Ralph Brownlee,
Architect, spoke in support 9f the proposed project, and gave a short pres~
entation on the plan that was displayed. Alderman Traboulay inquired concern-
ing recreation for children, and Mr. Brownlee advised that the project was

not really planned as a development for children, but for adults; however, he

stated he could not guarantee that children would not be present. Alderman

Traboulay stated his understanding thet at this point the project was merely

approved ir: principle leading to a Land Use Contract at which time the ques-
tion of the various amenities, including possible children's recreation area,
could be considered and the City Planner advised that this Was correct.
Plan.Off.re From the Planning Officer, September 19th, 1974, stating that in his
Appln. #R18~-74
opinion Application R#18-74 for "Development Area" designation to allow the
development of a mixed commercial/apartment building at 2338 Marpole Avenue,
is acceptable in terms of land use as the subject site borders existing
cCummercial and apartment development and it is a logical extension of such

uses.

Moved by Alderman Ranger:

Seconded by Alderman Laking:

That as recommended in a report from the Planning Officer, September
L9th, 74, Application R#18-74 to rezone the N. 128' of Lot 12, Block 4,
D.L. 379, Plan 1213, located at 2338 Marpole Avenue from RS-1 (One-Family

Residential) to a "Development Area" to permit development of a mixed com-