MP argues against way land claims are settled THE SIZE and scope of the pro- posed Sahin, Dene and Metis land claims agreement in the Northwest Territories has Skeena MP Mike Scott con- vineed tt is bad news for Canada. Below are excerpts from a speech, made to the House of Commons on May 2, in which | Scott outlined his position. ONE CANNOT help but be struck with the magnitude of the land transfer. Over 42 sq. km. for every adult will be conveyed fee simple. Ia a world which continues to "experience significant population growth, and where population density in many countries are _ Measured in bundreds of human beings for each square kilometer, -it is impossible to reconcile this massive land grant. ~T ask aboriginal people to con- - sider this very carefully. Cana- da’s "population continues lo grow. We continue to accept im- - migrants and refugees from ail over the world to come and make their home in this country — and while we may disagree with cur- rent immigralion levels, all Cana- dians and all members of this house embrace this. Admittedly, colonization creal- ed much hardship and injustice for native Indians of the day as well, and I think we as Canadians recognize that this is an in- escapable part of our history. In addition to the outright trans- fer of over 40,000 sq. kms. of land fee simple, the federal government will pay out approxi- mately $130 million dollars over the next 15 years lo the Sahtu Tribal Council. This equates to more than $130 thousand for cach adult covered under the agreement, Again, to put this in perspec- tive, if every adult Canadian was given this same amount of money, the government would Mike Scott need more than $3 trillion dollars in the bank to write out the che- ques. $3 trillion dollars is more than four times Canada’s total debt of $700 billion which includes fed- eral, provincial and municipal government debt. Furthermore, even alter such a massive transfer of land and cash, nothing in the agreement affects the ability of the Sabtu, Dene and Metis to receive existing and fu- ture benefits under aboriginal programs. In discussions with my con- stituents on the land claims ques- tion, 1 hear a diverse range of opinions on how to resolve the is- sue. The one consisicnt theme Tunning through all of these is finality. , People want assurance that the resolution of land claims will entail a systematic reduction and phasing out of taxpayer funded aboriginal programs delivered by the government. This agreement achicve this. OF the $130 million to be paid to the Sahtu Tribal Council only some $3,500 will be given to in- dividuals as one-time grants. Virtually ali of the benefits con- ferred upon the Sahiu, Dene and does not How logging is calculated By JOHN CUTHBERT Chief Forester The British Columbia Forest Service is conducting a Timber Supply Review in response to the “urgent need for up-to-date in- formation after years of dramatic changes in how forests are managed. In March 1991, a forest service study identified the reasons why existing: annual allowable cuts (AACs) were unsustainable given current forest management. Existing processes leading to AAC determinations took years to’ complete, uscd out-dated analytical techniques, and Failed to. adequately consider other forest values. The Timber Supply Review was developed to provide a picture of ‘current, medium term and long term timber supply on crown land which iss * independent, * objective, * accurale, and * up to date. More. changes in forest prac- tices are In store, and a wider Tange. Of forest values and resources must be considered. The review process is designed 1c .accommodaie change and io ‘stimulale = public comment through the release of reports and discussion papers, and public meclings. Timber Supply Review's use The Timber Supply Review will provide information for consider- ation by the Chief Forester in determining AACs - as required under the Forest Act. Section 7 of the Act requires considcration of the following . factors: -* the sustainable rate of timber production taking into account - current forestry, silviculture and integrated resource management practices; * short and long {erm implica- . flons of allernative timber harvest rates; “* the capabilities and require- ments of iimber processing facilities; ‘* Salvage programs due to in- sect infestations or devastations: and jectives of the government. - -® the: economic and social ob- AACs are not determined by mathematical calculation. They are the best judgments of the Chief Forester considering the qualitative and quantitative fac- tors required under the Act. Advocacy efforts of any indi- vidual or group are not consider- ed by the Chief Forester. Further- more, the Chief Forester is inde- pendent of the political process, and does not take direction on setting AACs from the Minister of Forests. The review process In each of the 36 timber supply area in B.C., a supply analysis is undertaken based on the best available information. Each anal- ysis report is released for public comment, and the information is used fo analyze the socio- economic implications of the tim- ber supply findings. This analysis is also released for public comment. A public dis- cussion paper is prepared which summarizes both types of analy- sis and discusses the implications. Public discussion of these reporis is critical to the review process, The forest industry, com- munities, small business opera- tors, special interest groups and individuals all have an op- portunity to review the situation and provide feedback based on informed opinion. The Chief Forester considers feedback on technical matters relating to timber supply analysis, and the Minister of Forests con- siders comments on sacio- economic issues. The public review and discus- sion period is three to four months. The Chief Forester then makes the AAC determination. Concerns Concerns have been raised about the methodology, rapid schedule and quality of data in timber supply analyses. [ would like to clarify these matters to al- lay the concerns that have been expressed, I believe the current timber supply analysis process is the best available. It has been reviewed carefully by industry and academ- ° ic experts. Information from the field is etitered into comprehen- sive computer programs 10 gener- ‘ate accurate and objective harvest - “Y want to see aboriginal peoples have an op- portunity to decide by referendum whether they want self-government and in the resolution of land claims, whether they want money and land turned over to themselves as indi- viduals or to band lead- ers.” . Metis under this agreement will be controlled by Indian’ leaders rather than distributed to individ- uals, Governments, all governments, including this one here in Ottawa, are notoriously bad managers of wealth and resources. I don’t be- lieve a majority of Canadians have any doubts about that. If ] were a rank and file Sahtu, Dene, or Metis I would prefer that [ received a direct personal benefit rather than having money and land given over to the control of the tribal council. I receive entreaties on an ongo- ing basis fom native people living on reserves in my riding telling me of the injustice they receive at the hands of their lead- ers. They tell me 2 of nepotism where band jobs and other perks go to relatives and friends of native leaders while others are shut out. This is typically the way governments function —- fust look at our federal. government’s behaviour, if you need any con- vincing. It is for these reasons and be- cause I believe in the value and dignity of the individual over the collective — regardless of what collective we are talking about — that I am a strong advocate for settlements government to indi- vidual, rather than government lo government. Before I can support any legis- lation for sclfgovernment or land claim resolutions I want to see the affected aboriginal peoples have an opportunity to decide by Tefercndum whether they want self-government and in the Tesolution of land claims, whether they want money and land turned over to themselves as individuals or to band leaders. My deepest concem over this bill is the precedent being set for future land claim negotiations. The first B.C. land claim to be accepted by the federal govern- ment -for negotiation is the Nisga’a claim, Negotiations have been uno- derway for some time behind closed doors and therefore, in a forum where my constituents have no information as to what is on the table in terms of land and resources, When my constituents express their deep concern about being shut out of the process, they are patted condescendingly on the head and told by government of- ficials, who patted us on the head, and told us that the Charlottetown accord was good for us. You can, therefore, understand why people in my riding are very doubtful that their interests are being protected. The Sahtu, Dene, and Metis agreement will only serve to increase their concem. It is imperative that the people in Skeena receive an opportunity to vote on proposed land claim seitlemenis within ihe riding to ensure thal setilement agreements are not imposed from the top down, In saying that, let me reassure Indian people that Canadians are very fair minded and I’m sure that any just and equitable settle- ments proposed will be sup- ported, THE LOCAL forest service has lots of experts studying how many trees there are and how land should be used. Two of those are inventory resource officer Dave Nichclson, left, and resource management planner Kevin Kilpatrick. schedules based on all forest uses and values. Crilical factors are identified, and a varicty of forest use as- sumplions are tested to determine their impact on timber supply. This sensitivity analysis ap- proach ensures that supply projections are realistic and adap- tive fo changing forest manage- ment, Earlier analyses were based on a narrow range of harvest options which did not include sufficient consideration of other forest uses and values. For that reason, they ere not reliable predictors of sustainable timber harvest levels. The new Ministry of Forests analysis process incorporates pro- cedural and technical improve- ments which produce much more reliable results than past methods — and In a fraction of the time, Timber supply analyses which used lo take years to complete can now be produced in six to cight months. The data used on current timber supply analyses is substantially better than the data that used to be used — though it is never as complete as we might wish. Marcover, the sensitivity analyses enable us to identify areas where the -information is weak, 80 we can imprové. our knowledge for the next round of analysis, “ “John Cutan ; lam confident that the Timber Supply Review represents a big improvement over past methods, and that it provides me with much better information on which to base allowable annual cuts which are realistic and sustainable. Born in Summerland, John Cuthbert joined the forest service in Terrace in 1961 with a@ Bachelor of Science in Forestry depree from the University of British Columbia. He tecane a Registered Professtonal Forester in 1965, ’ Mr. Cuthbert's career involved a number of positions, . He was named chief forester in April 1985. The Terrace Standard, Wednesday, May 18, 1994 - A5 CORRESPONDENCE FOR THE TERRACE STANDARD The Mail Bag Bad medicine explained Dear Sir: An editorial in your May 4 publication commented on the British Columbia Pharmacy Association's television campaign which Taises awareness about the negative impact of the provincial povernment’s changes lo Pharmacare. ‘We agree with your editorial in that the message is a very strong one. This is the firs! time we have had to employ such measures, but we feel very strongly that the NDP government has threatened ihe lives of seniors. And the government has refused to listen to us. While our ad {s strong, we sland by it. How do you portray seniors al risk in a nice way? The British Columbia Pharmacy Association is a volunteer group of modest means, and gathering the Funds for this campaign is na easy task. However, we are sufficiently worried that senior may not be as concerned as they ought to be: * 20% of hospital admissions of seniors are due to the misuse of prescription medications. * 10,000 times per year, a pharmacist in B.C. intervenes to pre- vent a possibly deadly interaction. * seniors are getting sick and some even die; this ought not to happen, and as health professionals we wish to prevent it. The message in our ad is a tough one, but it is even tougher if un- heard. The NDP government has targeted the seniors with an extra $8 million in user fees. Worse than that, the government has further endangered the lives ‘of seniors by increasing the co-pay on ihe pharmacist’s fee, result- ing in more stockpiling, more waste and more chance a tragedy will occur. Bob Kucheran Executive director, B.C. Pharmacy Association Advertising “deplorable” Dear Sir: The Pharmacare alternative chosen by government, was to attempt to change the behaviour of physicians and pharmacists. First, government sald that Pharmacare would only pay for the least expensive drug that does the job. If someone still wants the ex- pensive brand they will have to pay the difference. If a doctor specifies that no alternative drug is to be substituted then Pharmacare will continue to pick up the costs. This policy does not deprive anyone of free choice; it simply says that public money will not be wasted on brand names that offer no greater benefit. Second, government said that the user fees would increase from 75 per cent of the dispensing fee to 100 per cent of the fee. The avetage dispensing fee in British Columbia is $6.20, so that meant an increase of about $1.50 per prescription - a lot better deal than having to pay all of the Hirst $500. The combination of the $1.50 average increase plus substitution to the cost effective drugs resulis in just as much savings as the alternative of making most seniors pay for all of the first $500 in drug bills. You might ask why is the B.C. Pharmacists Association running those T.V. ads described in your May 4 editorial as ‘‘Bad medi- cine’? and criticizing the ‘government? The answer is that an increase of just $1.00 in the dispensing fee would ‘be: worth ‘$10 ‘million to °B.C. pharmacists. It’ would ‘have’ ’ been i lot édsiér'tfo get the fée"iup by a dollar if seniois ‘Were paying” bills averaging $40 a prescription; than it would be when they just pay the dispensing fee where the buck increase stands out. The Pharmacisis Association also claims that by having seniors pay the full dispensing fee or $1.50 more, they will buy larger pres- criptions. It turns out that it may be good health care and good cco- nomics to dispense medication for chronic conditlons in larger amounis. In cases where pharmacists are paid capitation fees, that is by the person, rather than by the prescription, they actually dispense larger quantities for chronic medications. It appears that the argument about the size of prescriptions has more to do with some pharmacists who want to collect more in fees than It does with good health or good economics, - Whatever the position of the B.C, Pharmacists Association is, their T.V, advertising is deplorable, and I would urge every. local pharmacist to distance themselves from that type of misinformation and fear mongering. Helmut Giesbrecht, M.L.A, Skeena Let’s hear it for Gim’s With regards to a letter by Julia E. Little, May 4, 1994, I am in to- tal agreement with Mrs, Little that ihe library should not be on park land. I will second the motion to purchase Gim’s restaurant to make it into a library. Gim's has ample parking and a wheel chair ramp near arear entrance. All in favour say aye! ~ Dear Sir: Randy C. Halgh, Terrace, B.C. us THE START JS FOR PEOPLE LEARNING TO READ The Start Good news for library | THERE’S GOOD news for the library. It’s getting money from the provincial government. This means the library will be able to build an expan- sion. The $200,000 comes from the B.C. 21 program. When the expansion is done, there will be more room for books. There will be room to use computers. There will be more room for people to read. And the staff will have more room. The expansion has been planned for six years. Work i is expected to start right away. : Kermodel bear shot OLD GIMPY has been shot He was a very old Kermodei bear. He. lived on the’east side of Katum Lake. Lots of people saw the bear over the past years. Old Gimpy got his name because he got hit by a car once, That made him a bit lame. Conservation officers are looking into the shooting. It can be illegal to shoot a Kermodci bear without a good reason, . a Old Gimpy’s hide has already been sent away fot test- ing. he ug? aga Mags