° j Feat ht an , a ae | at i V Es , , : . li amant _ ) | | | Vietapr 4 i aye e RYO, br ap Huu ldap ws LE sy OP Ney = TEN fee WEDNESDAY, MARCH 13, 1991 DEE Vol. 7; Issue No. 11 oe Phone 635-7840. Fax 635-7269. Serving the communities of Terrace, Thornhill, Usk, Cedarvale, Kitwanga, Meziadin, Stewart and the Nass Valley Seventy-five cents - plus GST VOLUNTEERS TO THE RESCUE. An attached shed was destroyed, but quick action by Thomhill Volunteer firefighters saved a Sande St. residence on the weekend. A thick column of black smoke marked the focation of the fire which started in the shed sometime before 3:30 p.m. Saturday aftemoon and threatened to spread to the home. The cause of the fire Is stii under investigation. For a look at what firefighters do with their rather limited spare time, tum to page B7. reservoir — expansion considered — TERRACE — Construction of a new reservoir is being considered by the city. The project, if it goes ahead, will increase the volume of the city’s reservoir size by a factor of about 50 and provide residents with a better quality water supply. According to director of engi- neering Stew Christensen, the proposal comes from a recently completed $35,000 study of the city water supply that began with the adoption of the 1990 city budget a year ago last month. While exact details aren’t yet available, Christensen says the project would consist of an earthen dam located about a half mile west of the Deep Creek reservoir at the headwaters of Spring Creek. The dam, which would have very little if any effect on Spring Creek water users, would be approxi- matcly 300 feet wide and 35 feet high, and the cost would likely be in the neighbourhood of $500,000, a sum of money much less than it would cost for what some might consider the ultimate solution — something akin to a small version of Vancouver's Cleveland dam that might cost closer to $10 tillion. But while a $10 million project might forever end the annoying summer-time sprinkling restric- tions, the proposed project at about five percent of that cost is expected to improve the situation well beyond its present. state. A best guess at the present time, is that summer sprinkling restrictions might be reduced from the current average of every second year lo about one in every four to eight. It should be noted, however, this estimate is based on a second phase to the project: doubling the size of the present water line between the reservoir and the city. The greatest improvement, how- ever, might not be so much in water quantity as it is in water quality. According to Christensen, both Spring and Deep creeks con- tain water of much better quality than the Skeena River. And according to John Knowles of UMA Engineering in Vancouver, the consultant who did the reser- voir study for the city, our two greatest health concerns locally are giardia lamblia (beaver fever) and algae. But no giardia problem has been _ detected in Deep Creek and the using the headwaters of Spring Creck won’t make any significant difference, says Knowles. And as far as algae is concerned, the low pH factor (slight acidity) of Spring Creek water will tend to discour- age algae formation, and the smal! amounts of algac that might form can be controlled with an algicide (control chemical). A the present time, a lange por- tion of our water supply, during periods of heavy. use, comes from the Skeena River. In fact, at one point fast year, the Skeena was our only source -of ‘water. The Deep — Continued on page A2