Esai ORE No help for IWA in Noranda boardroom By SEAN GRIFFIN Nearly onein three members of the International Woodworkers is without a job in B.C. this week —ithat’s the finding of the latest survey conducted by Region 1. The new unemployment figure of 31 percent shows a grim up- ward trend from an earlier survey conducted by the union in which showed 27 per- cent ot the IWA members were out of wark. Some of the increase over that month can be attributed to winter conditions and the resulting shut- down of the logging, but plywood layoffs still account for a major part of the unemployment. Some 39 percent of plywood workers are jobless and just this week Weldwood announced a two- week closure of its big Kent operation in Vancouver and a month-long shutdown at the 100-Mile House mill. Certainly the worsening job picture in the industry should pro- mpt the [WA to question the position it took a month ago when unemployment was con- sidered to be already at its worst. “*As I look at the market, I am looking at an uptick in the U.S. housing market by March at the latest,’ union researcher Doug Smyth said Dec. 8. But there is little more reason to anticipate recovery now than there was in the final days of 1981 — as long as the federal budget ~ remains and the U.S. contines to be the key market. Virtually every indicator across the country has pointed to the federal budget as a major source of continuing — and worsening — unemployment. And in the U.S., Federal Reserve Board chairman, Paul Volcker, the main architect of the Reagan ad- ministration’s high interest rate policy, just told a home builders’ convention Monday that they could expect no relief — that high interest rates would continue, thus depressing even further the U.S. housing market. So long as these policies con- tinue, the message is clear: if the IWA hopes to ‘‘wait out”’ the cur- rent recession, woodworkers could be waiting for a long time. That economic background makes even more ominous the re- cent comments by Noranda vice- president Adam Zimmerman — and the response given them by IWA regional president Jack Munro. Zimmerman, the executive vice-president of Noranda, which has the controlling interest in MacMillan-Bloedel, told the truck loggers convention Jan 13 that the current structure of union-management relations was wrong and that there would have to be change if the health of the industry were to improve. But the main burden of Zim- merman’s address was unloaded on the trade union movement. He contrasted the role of shareholders and unionized workers, suggesting that if shareholders acted like workers, “they could demand. ruinous dividends, ridiculous withdrawals of capital and capricious in- vestments.”” ANALYSIS. He added, pointedly, that it would not be unreasonable to make unions subject to the Com- petition Act which would preclude industry-wide or na- tional bargaining and substitute plant by plant bargaining instead. - Zimmerman knews-as did, un- doubtedly most of his audience, that putting trade unions under the Competition Act — as has been sought by the big fish com- panies and the federal govern- ment against the UFAWU — would effectively emasculate col- lective bargaining. Every regional, provincial and national collective agreement could be open to challenge for ‘‘restraint of trade,” and unions would be forced to sign contracts on an enterprise-by-enterprise basis, enabling employers to play one plant off against another. Major unions organized on an industry-wide basis would all be faced with a legal cbeleoee to their existence. The Zimmerman address signalled an intensified attack on the trade union movement at a time when employers sense a cer- tain “‘softening- -up’ ’ as aresult of the economic crisis. That the IWA’s Munro should accept the.call by Zimmerman to meet to seek anew basis for labor- management relations must have raised some question, among IWA members, particularly those looking for some answers to their immediate problems of unemployment. However favorably one might want to read the Zimmerman speech, there was still an anti- union message. The Noranda ex- ecutive wants to diminish the economic power of unions by stripping them of their main strength, their industry-wide organization, and reducing them to mere plant committees which can then sit down with the employer to work out problems. Zimmerman even suggested that the policy of high interest’ rates — which has been the major villain in the current industry crisis — should be considered a signal that ‘‘we have been too ex- travagant.”” Unionists can agree with Munro that ‘‘if people like Zim- merman who are heavyweights in the economy of Canada can’t get the government to do something to put protection in for workers or allow workers to have mor- tgage rates they can afford, then Zimmerman shouldn’t take it out on the workers, he should take it out on the banks.”’ But the fact is that Noranda is not going to do anything to reverse the government’s high in- terest rate policy. On the con- . trary, Zimmerman himself is a director of the Continental Bank} which is profiting from the) policy. W What could compel the | government to alter its policy is the kind of action taken by the Canadian Labor Congress Nov 21. There has been little follow-up action since, but if there were pressure to continue and expand the compaign from leaders liké Munro, whois an executive coun- cil member of the CLC, it could bring results. Closer to home, mobilization of the membership of the IWA across the province has been) sought by many locals. There have been local actions,. par-" ticularly on ~Vancouver. | Island where industry unemployment has had a devastating impact on the local economy, but little leadership and initiative has come from the regional level. As one IWA delegate to the j B.C. Federation of Labor con- vention last December put it: “‘There has to be leadership to do something about unemployment. If we don’t get leadership, then) we'll have to do it ourselves. And we will — but it won’ tbeas effecs tive.’ Leadership from the region is level to organize the IWA to d mand action from both Victo and Ottawa could force a chang in government policies. That ~ change certainly isn’t going to come from the boardroom of Noranda. . F i ‘Fishermen told to finance own bonkruptc Alarmed by the recommenda- tions of the Pearse report, fishing industry organizations are coming together to hammer out a common - position. The opening move in _ what is expected to be a coast-wide campaign was to be made this Fri- day, Jan. 29, with the holding of a mass meeting of fishermen in Called on the initiative of the United Fishermen and Allied Workers Union, the meeting follows wide discussion of the report within the union itself and talks between the union and representatives of other industry organizations. Among those com- mitted to participation in the meet- ing at Tribune press time were the PPWC backs off raid Continued from page 1 __TheCPU has already stated that other mills, in Crofton, Powell River and elsewhere will be shut down by the union if M-B disciplines workers for refusing to handle the pulp until an agreement is reached. The dispute over the pulp has dramatized the high unemploy- ment in the Alberni Valley which ionists fear will only get worse if _ M-B1s able, as it has insisted, ‘‘to hav the freedom to purchase materials without restrictions.” -Theunity of the CPU has been seen as critical in preventing M-B from taking work away from union operations. : In a letter to the Alberni Valley Times, Jan. 20, CPU Local 686 _ vice-president Jack Mitchell em- phasized that hundreds of TWA members were unemployed “because M-B is importing chips 2% from sources other than the Alber- ni Valley.” A statement issued by CPU Locals 592 and 686 also noted that ina vee tee 8, M-B had acknowledged the union’s demand was reasonable and agreeable but’ = PACIFIC TRIBUNE—JAN. 29, 1982—Page 8 changed its position in a-subse- quent meeting two days later. . The union has also noted that ex- pansion at the CPU-certified Finlay Forest Industry mill at Mackenzie, which formerly sup- plied Alberni Pulp, would enable the company to resume supplies of pulp after the contract with Quesnel River runs out in 1983. Despite that, however, M-B refuses to give assurances to the CPU, arguing that “‘labor restric- tions ... are viewed by our customers as a threat to reliable ser- vice and supply.”” Meanwhile, the independent Pulp, Paper and Woodworkers of Canada _ has withdrawn its raid against the CPU in Alberni. The raiding campaign, launched by the PPWC last week, came under heavy criticism because it would _ have undermined the CPU at a time when unity was urgent. In withdrawing, PPWC vice- president Ross McDonald said that for the union to interfere ‘would have been to the detriment of those _in the mill and that was not our in- tention. Vessel Owners Association and the Pacific Trollers Association. ‘Although other industry organizations don’t share our union’s full opposition to the report’s recommendations, all are agreed that they need more time to "assess the implications before they define their position,’’ Bruce Logan, chairman of the union’s special committee said this week. “The danger is, that federal fisheries minister Romeo LeBlanc already has announced his inten- tion to implement some of the recommendations as interim measures. “The disastrous effect of the Davis Plan on the fishing industry — except for the B.C. Packers fishing monopoly — is generally recognized. But (former federal fisheries minister and now Social Credit MLA for North Vancouver- Seymour) Jack Davis told fishermen he intended to force that plan on them even if 99 percent of them were against him.”’ Major recommendations made by Dr. Peter Pearse, sitting as a one man commission, were for imposi- tion of royalties on catches to be paid by fishermen, reduction of the fishing fleet through a buy-back scheme to be financed in part by the royalties, and imposition of in- dividual catch quotas in the halibut, food herring and abalone " fisheries this year. Unlike Davis, who insisted that the fishing licence should be Placed on the vessel over the union’s strenuous contention that it should x be on the man, Pearse proposed to place the licence on the man, but to make it transferable — again over the union’s objection that it should be non-transferable because ‘‘a- transferable licence can only perpetuate the cycle of speculation . . the root of the current (fleet) over-capacity.”’ Union leaders, who have oppos- ed the recommendations from the: outset, say it is the first time a com- mission’s report has been based on a predetermined government pol- icy rather than the government drawing its policy from the com- mission’s recommendations, how- ever they may be applied. pe Les royalty is to be im- plemented, it should be levied on that section which profits most, the processors. Fishermen barely make a living from this industry, yet the Weston and Marubeni empires continue to expand. . .” says a UFAWU leaflet. . The long-term effect of the (Pearse) report will be a a RISUNE large percentage of fishermen! beallowed to go brokeas a basis® ; ‘fleet rationalization.’ In e 5 the federal government wants finance our way into bankrupt UFAWU secretary Geo Hewison sees the recommel tions as opening the way to furl destruction of the environment! decimation of salmon runs as! farming by corporations repla preservation and enhancemen It wild runs. | 3 ‘‘What happens to © fishermen?’’ he asks. ‘‘The dustry already is under monoP control and the extent-of that © trol is reflected in the recommer tions. If those recomme are implemented, it means i i ing privatization of the industt) the exclusion of more and m working fishermen as bays 4 lets pass under private contro! and the way is open for : Hydro, mining and other big terests to carry through their P jects.”” Vancouver, B.C. City or town Postal Code Published weekly at Suite 101 — 1416 Commercial Drive, V5L 3X9. Phone 251-1186 Read the paper that fights for labor Pe ie ee ee ey ©. PSE 6g plete + 0a ee lam enclosing: 1 year $12 2 years $220) 6 months $7 0 OldO New(] Foreign 1 year $15 0 Bill me later 2) Donation $ kee ee ee ee ee