of our time. pe coexistence and co- . SPeration between the Un- Red States and other capital- : ist countries and the Soviet _ Union and the other socialist nations, to banish. war from. . he earth was urged in an ar- -lcle by N. Inozemtsev in a zecent. issue of Pravda, the ‘eviet Communist newspaper. : Tnozemtsev places great em- _Phasis on the importance of L Race, to the world today. - “In the modern world, sat- ‘urated with the means of ™ass destruction to the maxi- -Mum, the prevention of a world thermonuclear disaster E : €n indispensable condition “Or any progress, the most -*mportant prerequisite for the Civilization and the solution °f most important social, pol- Hical and national problems.” i . “This is why,” he adds, “the new CPSU program re- “9ards the struggle for gener- ral Peace as the most import- "&nt practical task.’ |. Hitting out at the dogmat- ists, who’ “clamor very much about not being afraid of mod- ern. Mperialists,’ Inozemtsev declares: » “These adversaries actually - Underestimate. the influence - 0f worl@? socialism and the oe -“international » rela- 4 Sand, in. fact, over-esti- “Mate_and exaggerate the ca- Paice of imperialism. There- 4 Af they impede the mobiliza- ¢ = of the efforts’ of the peo- see €s for the prevention of 4 See elear “war. and ob- ers ‘the realization by the iets ; Communist movement € Breatest task set before by history: the establish- ment of lasting peace on Fae Pravda writer recalls : ‘ constantly ‘iterated bid of Ae Soviet government for : ose coexistence between. Rvs capitalist and socialist + €ms, warning at the same j ee the world disaster if Present tensions are per- Bet to degenerate into a —ermo-nuclear war. € emphasized that it is frowth of economic and tical power of the social- nations, now overbalanc- ict of the capitalist camp B to thi makes it possible now B tion mk in terms of co-oper- { Bay to maintain peace. | TS FOR COOPERATION i © points out that while i 8 relationship of world for- 4 ce make Possible co- Bes 10n to maintain world Meine the leaders of the cap- ist world would first have © realize: e hes the political field: The trace interest of all states, _ Si peoples, in’ preventin World: thermo-nuclear “war. af ene -More:reasonable rep- Bay 0% Sey Poli = ist ing: Pie’, further development of world | ie'|:tative families about their Peaceful coexistence —the way to banish war The capitalist press repeatedly tries to misrepresent _ the meaning of peaceful coexistence. Here, in this ar- ticle from Pravda, a leading Communist in the Soviet © Union outlines the significance of the fight for peace today—and why to coexist is th not and must .not be _the means of solving ideological disputes between the two systems. : ae “The essence of the con- temporary - strategic situation ialist might that for imperial- ism to develop a new: world war would be equivalent -to its suicide. “In the econoreic field: The existence of common and uni- versal economic relations re- garding which V. I. Lenin wrote that they are ‘stronger force than the desire, will or decisions of hostile stages.or classes.’ “In our time, in connection with the sharp reduction of the capitalist world’s territor- ial limits and the steady growth of the relative weight of the socialist states in the world economy and world trade, life itself pushes the capitalist states toward nor- malization and expansion of economic relations with the Soviet Union and the world socialist system.” To achieve co-operation for maintenance of world peace, Inozemisev urges an immed- iate struggle “for liquidating the basic sources of the dan- ger of war, for solving the ‘chief international problems.” The Pravda writer cites among these: =~ © Total and general dis- armament under strict inter- national control; : © A German peace treaty, including solution of the West Berlin question; e An end to colonial op- pression in whatever form it appears; $ © Entry of People’s Chin into the United Nations, and “vital improvement in the. mechanism of the United Na- tions.” e most important issue -need for a vast expansion. of is the existence of such soc-| _desire to come to agreement cultural. and; economic rela- tions. among: all. peoples. “Because * of -the rapid in- crease. in the: nazi-dominated West German militarization, Inozemtsev underscores — the urgency. of:an immediate sol- cution of the: German and ‘West Berlin problems. — The Pravda article makes clear’ once: again» what the Soviet Union:means by ‘peace- ful. coexistence. —= continua- tion of the ‘sharpest class struggle between socialism and capitalism,” but at the same time “‘cooperation of the governments of the two op- posing systems for the pur- pose of maintaining peace.” COMPETITION The intent of this, appar- ently, is to offer a peaceful economic competition of the two systems. If capitalism really believes its system is best, it should not be afraid to compete peacefully with the socialist system, is the es- sence of the Soviet challenge. Inozemtsev asserts the Soviet confidence that the socialist system will win in any such peaceful competi- tion. In recent months, observ- -ers of the Washington scene have seen a tendency by some members: of President Ken- hedy’s administration to hunt ‘for. weaknesses in the inter- -national- position of the Sov- iet Union to make it possible for the leadership of the cap- italist world: to-dictate terms -of.a settlement of world ten- sions. Every time, in the recent past, that the Soviet govern- ment. has expressed a sincere on the maintenance of peace, it has been wishfully inter- rupted in Washington as a sign of weaknegs. Inozemtsev stresses the ca has become a ‘“‘people’s capitalism,” with ownership of the nation’s corporation widely spread among the rhal mass of the people? This idea has been widely touted by Wall Street, by some politicians and by many newspapers. But a new fac- tual survey, made public re- cently, shows the ‘‘people’s capitalism’”’ notion is a phon- ey. The new survey was con- ducted last winter by the| University of Michigan Sur- ‘vey. Research Centre, a res- pected polling group. They asked an unusually large na- tional sampling of represen- - -owhership of ‘corporate stock.’ People’s capitalism? cE it really true that Ameri- _ ‘| cent of the nation’s families. ‘account. for just 10 per-cent of « totals..corporate “stock: . >.>" The number of families who own a little bit of stock has increased substantially since earlier surveys in 1952 and 1955. But even now only ‘14 per cent of America’s fam- ilies own any stock at all. More significant, 64 per cent of all corporate common stock is Owned by families making $10,000 or more a year. This well-to-do and wealthy group of stockhold- ers amounts to just six per Yet they own nearly two- thirds of all. the corporate stock. : In contrast, nearly half the nation s families have incom- es of less. than. $5,000 a year. And the relatively..few stock owners in this income ‘group | What disarmament could mean . . ploughshares HH": are some estimates Of cosis of variOus items of wel- fare and the equivalent amount of welfare that that these millions would buy. They serve to point out the enormous benefits that could be derived from dis- armament and the use of the wasted military billions for people’s welfare. MILITARY ITEM APP. COST WELFARE EQUIV. Polaris missile Titan ICBM Submarine $1.3 million $2 million $20 million Balltistic missile early $1 billion warning system Base for Atlas ICBM$22 million Missile research and development unit Military electronics research and produc- tion unit ‘$3,135,000 $8,750,000 KC-135 flying tanker$4 million Lockheed interceptor F-104C Douglas RB-66 D Des- —_ troyer twin jet recon- naissance bomber Underground base - for Titan ICBM ICBM B-70 Valkyrie jet. bomber Jupiter missile ‘marine $2.4 million $50 million $250 million $150 million ~ $1.2 million Polaris nuclear sub- $100 -millio 4-year college educa- tion for 160 students 4 fully-equipped sup- ervised) playgrounds at $500,000 10 small hospitals. at $2 million each 300 school buildings at $3.3 million each 22 small hospitals at $1 million each Medical-surgical hos- pital buildings with 216 beds 875 dwelling units in modern housing pro- jects 100 school classrooms at $40,000 each $1.2 million 3 public libraries at $400,000 : 480 new school teach- ers at $5,000 annual salary 1 new medical school built and equipped Columbia River dam, 1% miles long, for power, irrigation, na- vigation, recreation. 37 new school build- ings at $4 million ea. 60 homes at $20,000 each 2S new. -160-bed: hos- --pitals-at-$4 million ea. | February 15, 1862--PACIFIC “TRIBUNE—Page 7. ere eee ee rr meas . i | } i ||