After tragic assassination Pacific bi FRIDAY, NOVEMBER 29, 1963 VOL. 24, NO. 48 RIBUNE =" 10¢ Who was this man= Lee Harvey Oswald? Who was Lee Harvey Oswald? Was he linked to the political left? Did he assassinate Presi- dent Kennedy? And why was he himself put out of the way? These are only a few of the Questions hanging over the entire Case of America’s fourth Successful presidential assass- ination, The press of the world Says the whole affair is covered by **a forest of question marks.”’ The answers to all the ques- tions may never be. known. In fact, the unusual haste with which Dallas police were prepared to say ‘*case closed’’ after Oswald’s murder would indicate a bold at- tempt to prevent adequate ans- wering of the questions posed. However, some facts are al- ready beginning to emerge. In a speech by Cuban Premier Fidel Castro, heard in Vancou- ver by several PT readers hours after the murders, the premier analyzed the relationship of forces in the United States, He said the issue at stake inthe U.S. was not one between the left and right—but between the moderates and the extreme right. The forces on the right wanted to change the Kennedy administ- ration’s policy; they were op- posed to the test ban treaty and the pledge given last year not to attack Cuba, as well as the civil rights program. Castro referred to remarks made by Kennedy several weeks ago in Miami, Florida that he would not allow another invasion of Cuba. He then quoted aleading Southern political figure who said something would happen in a short time to change this. Turning to Oswald himself, the premier said when Oswald went to live in the Soviet Union he offered that country military in- formation but was laughed at. See: Oswald, Pg. 3 AFL-CIO meet tips hat towards Canadian labor The AFL-CIO has tipped its hat in the direction of Canadian labor autonomy. Deferring to Widespread pressure for sover- Signty in the affairs of the Can- adian Labor movement, the recent AFL-CIO convention gave its executive council the right to Waive some of its international authority, Acting upon a resolution pre- Sented by the Brotherhood of Pulp, Sulphite and Paper Mill Orkers the convention seemed to agree that the Canadian Labor Congress should have the right to settle jurisdictional disputes arising in Canada among affili- ates of international unions. However, the move did not in- Struct the AFL - CIO executive ‘©0uncil to adopt a ‘hands ‘off’ , | _ toward Canadian = lems; it merely gave that body the power to refrain from pok- ing its nose into Canadian af- fairs should it so desire, press reports from Washington and New York have indicated. Even this limited, begrudging recognition of Canadian labor's rights represents somewhat of a victory, some observers feel. They point out that at least U.S. labor top brass has been made aware Canada is not the 51st state of the U.S.A., though this is still only a very small step on the road to Canadian trade union sovereignty. | Of no small consequence in this development were the roles play- ed by recent conventions of the Ontario, Quebec and B.C, Feder- ations ‘of ‘Labor—all - of which demanded: Canadian autonom ICH ROAD WILL . TAKE NOW ? As the world recovered from the shock and horror of the vio- lence which exploded last weekend in the rightist stronghold of Dallas, Texas which saw President Kennedy assassinated and his accused as- sassin murdered in the city’s police station by an ex-Chicago thug and known police stoolpigeon, the ques tion began to push itself into every- one’s mind: What does Kennedy’s death and the accession to power of Lyndon B. Johnson to the presidency mean for the world? What does it mean for Canada? Many questions about last weekend’s violence still linger in everybody’s mind. There is a strong feeling everywhere that the full truth of the bizarre and stunning events of last weekend have not been told to the pub- lic. In the aftermath of the ter- rible tragedy people in all lands are wondering: Will these events lessen the chances of» world peace? Will they help the strug- gles of the Negroes for equality? Will U.-.S. policies: remain the same or will the country move to the right? An audible sigh of relief went up when President Johnson this week assured Soviet Premier Khrushchev that the U.S. intends to carry forward efforts of the late President Kennedy to im- prove relations between the U.S. and the Soviet Union, For its part the Soviet Union hastened to call on the new U.S. president to co-operate in efforts toward relaxation of international tensions and measures to end the cold war. A front page edi- torial in Izvestia said that a joint U. S..— Soviet effort to- wards peace would be ‘‘the fin- est memorial’? to the murdered president. Of particular coneern to Can- adians was how the events of last weekend would affect Canada. Relations between the two coun- tries have deteriorated in recent weeks, U.S. insistence on Canada accepting nuclear arms, its interference in Canadian affairs on trade, manufacture of auto parts, labor matters and other issues has deeply concerned Can- adians, Likewise, the growing takeover of Canadian industry and natur- al resources, such as the Colum- LYNDON B. JOHNSON, new Presi- dent of the United States. A 55- year-old Texan millionare who made his money in oil and real estate. Will the right see new op- portunities in his elevation to pres- idency? Or will public pressure compel him to follow a more mod- Sovie! Premier Khrushchev and the late John F. Kennedy—photo- graphed during their first meeting in Vienna. Will the initiative towards peace taken by these two men with the test ban treaty be continued by the new administration? bia River, has very much ag- gravated relations between the two countries. How the new president of the U.S. will cope with these ques- tions which eventually affect Canadian independence are mat- ters which Canadians will haveto weigh up and assess in the next few weeks, Meanwhile, faced -with the events of the past weekend, the Pacific Tribune re-organized its pages this week to bring our readers the widest possible cov- erage of the critical events of last weekend, Of particular interest to our readers will be an article by the foreign affairs expert ofthe Brit- ish Daily Worker, Sam Russell, who in the following article as- esses the world-wide importance of the tragic events of last week- end and their significance to the world. By SAM RUSSELL America and the world will, in the coming weeks and months, be confronted with the crucial question of which way U.S. policy will face, both in international and home affairs, The whole history of President Kennedy’s 34 months of office showed how fierce was the strug- gle in the U.S. between the en- trenched forces of reaction and those elements—both inside and outside the Kennedy Administra- tion—which sought to strike out to the New Frontier. Of course, the New Frontier concept was vague and woolly, compounded as it was at atime when the anti- Communism of the Dulles brothers, Acheson, Truman and Co., was the most powerful element in the Demo- cratic Party. And President Kennedy and his New Frontiersmen had more than their fair share of anti- Communism; their loathing of the Soviet Union, and of -the mere mention of Socialism, bordering on the pathological. Yet there was among these New Frontiersmen back to the progressive tradi- tions of the New Deal under a harking. Roosevelt in home and foreign affairs, * * * But for such a policy to be suc- cessful, however tentative its ap- proach, it was necessary to mo- bilize the ordinary people of the U.S. and above all the 50 million Americans, the majority of them Negroes, who live in the direst poverty. The Kennedy Administration failed to do this, because it hoped it would somehow be possible to behead the tiger of extreme U.S. reaction by first cutting off its tail without its knowing, And so, in the first period of his tenure of office, President Kennedy was the prisoner of his own anti-Communist, multi-mil- lionaire background, coupled with the equivocal attitude he had adopted over the McCarthy witch-hunt, the most pressing is- sue in American politics at the time. He also came to power on a program promising an even more astronomic expenditure on arms than the Republican Eisenhower Administration had thought pos- sible, with an intensification of the nuclear arms race. The most explosive. issue in See WHICH