Iam at this tire the spokesram for a Group who oppose the
establishment of Neighbourhood Pubs in any area of our city.

I will be proceding with a petition to present to council at.
a later date on the grounds that a pub contributes to the
moral breakdown of our society, causes marriage breadups,

child abuse & neglect, ruined lives to the point of suicide.

I REQUEST THAT YOU CAREFULLY CONSIDER WHAT WOULD CONSTITUTE
PRODUCTIVE LAND USE rather than "DESTRUCTIVE LAND USET,

I FURTHER REQUEST THE FOLLOWING

That the public meeting held at Kilmer school be regarded as
invalid. It could not possibly accomplish what it should have
when there was lack of proper notification to those affected.

We should expect to get the truth and all the information from
council regarding the implications of the rezoning & licensing.
A questioner asked if the applicant was Mr. Bill Rudy-.and the

answer was "NO, “pr, Fontaine was presented as the applicant.

According to the Provincial Liquor Administration Branch, Mr.
Bill Rudy is the applicant and ?'r. Fontaine is unknown to them,

Is it not necessary for the owner of the property to make the
application for a Liquor License before council rezones the
property for another use? Ir, Charlie Hughes is the owner &
should he not be making the application for the licensing &

rezoning?

The letters sent out to homeowners by the City Clerk's office
did not cover the area of 3 mile radius of the proposed pub.
Therefore all that would be affected were not notified of the

public meeting by mail.

The reference in the circulated letter stated the location
has received a "pre-clearance" from the Prov. L. a. Branch.
This statement is very misleading to the public when in fact
there has only been an application acknowledged by them.

The public should be made fully aware of the necessary steps
required by P. L. A. B. in receiving a license.

‘Council should clear up the confusion between the regulations
governing the rezoning of the land, and the requirements for
obtaining a Liquor License. The Chairman at the meeting did
not clearly separate the two procedures and inform the local
homeowners of the specific nature of the "other proposed
businesses",

Would Coucil determine to hold a "Publie Information" type
of meetingrather than just a "Question & Answer"! format?