UTO eeesAY ON LIBERATION, by are two opposite ways the “‘New Left.” One is it as a sharp turn of youth Ww militant opposition to the bloody and dictatorial oper- om of capitalism today, varied id skeptical in its thinking but to develop its knowledge = theory, and as part of this, increasingly studying Marxism. The other is to stress its op- position to the “Old Left,” so that antagonism to Marxism, to @ Soviet Union and other so- countries, and to Commu- parties, becomes equal to ‘and even supersedes its antagon- i to capitalism. first view is in accordance | reality. The second has en- COlraged a number of would-be leaders and theoreticians of “revolution” to appear offering ideas as “improvements” Among these are Her- Marcuse, whose 91-page on Liberation is offered as tical guide for the New | Developments of Marxism are = to Marxism itself, a guar- of its scientific character, ing it to combat the chang- forms taken by exploitation 'drives toward war. “Im- ments” however, like those use, are quite different. consist of hidden borrrow- from Marxism, announced new ideas,” on which are ited ideologies long ago ex- B€d as bankrupt, but now re- vived in highly deceptive lan- Buage. Thus Marc:ise revives Utopian- He advances it deceptively: P to now, it has become one the principal tenets of .. . an theory, to refrain from Might be reasonably called ation.” This, he says, is ‘ictive,” and “must be re- wever, far from neglecting thought, Marx and En- attacked it as an outmoded ve form of social critic- y wrote in the Commu- Manifesto: ‘In proportion = modern class struggle de- and takes definite shape, intastic standing apart from Contest, these fantastic at- On it, lose all practical ‘and all theoretical justifi- ingly, this gives a clue MARCUSE REVIVES PIAN VIEWS to why Marcuse revives Utopian views. For him, the working class has been won to a munifi- cent capitalism, and has become “a conservative, even counterre- volutionary force.” Consequent- ly to Marcuse, the class struggle no longer exists. A revolution can take place only by convinc- ing people who are well off that their capitalist “affluence” is really “cruel,” and offering them a picture of a truly “free” so- ciety. e Ironically, Marcuse’s “Uto- pian” picture, which allegedly “improves” on Marx, is nothing other than a garbled version of statements made by Marx and Engels themselves, of what life would be like some generations after all class exploitation would be removed from the world. Thus Engels projects an existence guaranteeing to all “the free de- velopment and exercise of their physical and mental faculties” and the emergence of “really hu- man” conditions of life. But Marcuse must deny such ideas to Marx and Engels, and advance them as his own, be- cause he uses them in an anar- chist way. That is, he must use this picture of a future “free so- ciety” to berate present-day so- cialism, which happens to be growing in a world where impe- rialism also exists, and is now staunchly and militantly holding back the hand of imperialist nuc- lear war. Marcuse would like all forms of social organization in the so- cialist countries to wither away, now. Only thus can socialism appeal to the “new radicalism,” which has “aversion,” he says, “against preestablished leaders, apparatchiks of all sorts, politi- cians no matter how leftist.” The initiative, he says, now “shifts to small groups, widely diffused, with a high degree of autonomy, mobility, flexibility.” @ The result of this kind of arm- chair ‘theorizing is that the real imperialist threat of nuclear war —manifest at this writing, for example, in President Nixon’s attempt to escalate nuclear wea- ponry — disappears from Mar- cuse’s world picture. Yet this real threat of war is one of the most glaring forms in which the class struggle shows itself. And the Soviet Union’s policy of peaceful coexistence has both marshalled the peace forces of the world and put imperialism on the defensive. But to Marcuse, the policy of peaceful coexistence is a sign only that socialism has been “‘de- flected from its original goals,” and has yielded to capitalism. The Soviet Union, to him, has become wholly “‘a repressive bu- reaucracy,” and “the competitive coexistence with the West gen- erates values and aspirations for whith the American standard of living serves as a model.” He “proves” this by citing a Soviet policy “to catch up with and overtake the productivity level of the advanced capitalist coun- tries.” This, Marcuse says, is “false policy” because it uses capitalism as a “model.” It is to him one of many examples of how Communist policies have turned away from revolution. Another such example he points to is “the long-range Com- munist policy of “popular fronts’.” The fact that “popular fronts” marshalled the forces of humanity against fascism, and in the end destroyed the armies of fascism, means nothing to Mar- cuse. S But the brave Marcuse is not disheartened by the fact that, as he sees it, both the working class and the “socialist orbit” have been absorbed by capitalism, and are part of its “global domin- ion.” There is, he says, a “grow- ing opposition.” This consists of a “Great Refusal.” He cites ex- amples of those taking part in this Great Refusal. “In Vietnam, in Cuba, in China, a revolution is being defended and driven for- ward which struggles to eschew the bureaucratic administration, of socialism.” Apparently to Marcuse, these countries have no officialdom and no organized production, because that means “repressive bureauc- racy.” He twists their struggle into one not against capitalist impeiralism, but against the “old Left,” which in real life made these revolutions possible. Other elements in the Great Refusal, or true revolution, to Marcuse, are the surrealist paint- ers with their deliberate courting of the “unconscious” and the dream symbol, as well as other modern artists who are against any kind of “form” in art. For to Marcuse, any are which tries, as in the great humanist tradition, to combine “content” with “form,” only helps add to the sta- Data processing growing in G.D.R. By MARIANNE JAHN As in all highly developed in- dustrial countries, electronic data processing is gaining increasing significance in the G.D.R. Research, development and design can be enormously speed- ed up by means of data proces- sing. It was for instance possible in the field of G.D.R. ship-build- ing to reduce the time for cal- culating tasks of design from 200 to three hours. This does not only produce economic advan- tages but allows innovations to be introduced into practice more quickly and with a higher ef- ficiency. Production, control and accounting can be electronically controlled, too. According to prognostic estimates of scient- ists, for instance, 100,000 to 120,000 people will be assigned alone to the preparation of the employment and the operation of data processing equipment. That is why an _ increasing number of enterprises and insti- tutes set up computing centres. Changed with their operation originally were employees of the enterprise who mostly only learn- ed manual procedures and were considered as semi-skilled staff. This made it difficult to secure the supply of competent junior staff. According to a vocational analysis it was therefore decid- ed in the G.D.R. to train skilled workers for data processing. Training for this vocation in- cludes not only manual’ opera- tions, but also comprises intel- lectual work ranging from pro- gramming to the work with lagre sequential computers. This requires a high fun- damental knowledge in mathe- matics and physics; therefore the successful completion of 10 years of school education is the prerequisite for the conclusion of an apprenticeship contract. As the vocation facilitates a qualification at universities and technical colleges it became in- teresting for gifted young peo- ple. As a result the application increase from year to year. In this way junior staff is provided for this important field who, beside their good know- ledge in mathematics and natu- ral sciences, are willing to qual- ify themselves constantly as de- manded by the rapid develop- ment of technology. Such skilled workers can also rise to man- agement positions. A good know- ledge of their respective branch of economy, which can be gain- ed by studying economics is necessary for this. According to the principles of the further development of vo- cational training, which came up for public discussion in the G.D.R. a short time ago, the “skilled worker for data proces- sing” is a basic vocation. This means that the training is car- ried out in such a manner ¢hat the skilled worker is available for the most different tasks and is able to further qualify him- self. This corresponds to inter- national demands on the train- ing of young people who must expect to change their vocation several times in the course of the coming decades. The skilled worker for data processing is well prepared for this require- ment. The first apprentices, among them many girls, have successfully concluded _ their training in the spring of 1968. Panorama Marianne Heimann was among the first young people to con- clude their apprenticeship as skilled workers for data processing. bilization of repressive society. Life really, to him, has no form or order. Still another hopeful force tak- ing part in the Great Refusal, he says, is that.“‘the student oppo- sition is spreading in the old so- cialist as well as capitalist coun- tries.” Apparently Marcuse hopes that student revolution will over- throw the present Soviet Union government. If the CIA paid a provocateur to pose as a “true revolutionist” and sow confusion, blindness to reality and ignorance in the ranks of the Left, it could do no better than with Professor Mar- cuse. Sidney Finkelstein PACIFIC TRIBUNE—MA 969 Pane 9