: 2 Published every weekday at 3212 Kalum . Street, _.cf Terrace, B.C. A member of Varified Circulation, vu _ TERRACE/KIETIMAT daily herald | General Office - 435.4357 Circulation - 625-6357 Starling Publishers PUBLISHER - Calvin McCarthy ‘ EDITOR - Greg Middleton CIRCULATION TERRACE & KITIMAT . 6356357 Published by J ethorized as second class ‘mail. Registration number va. Postage pald In cash, return postage guaranteed. as NOTICE OF COPYRIGHT . “The Herald ratains full, complete and sole copyright in “any advertisement produced and-or any editorial or photographic content published In. the Heraid, Reproduction Is not permitted without the written permission of the Publisher. ; _/ ” OTTAWA OFFBEAT BY RICHARD JACKSON OTTAWA — Who's to blame, the bureaucrat, the parliamentarian, the press, the temper of the times? Or is it all just a myth that the federal bureaucracy, never anywhere in the national public popularity. ratings, is becoming almost an endangered species? Even here in his habitat, where the small, insulated - world of federal Ottawa revolves — if more and more grudgingly — around him, the public servant sort of ' ? glulks between parking lot and office tower. Under a cloudburst of abuse, the poor intimidated fellow's best hope seems to be that if he can’t get from . the safety of his car to the sanctuary of his work-place, “at least he won't be stoned. so ’, The contempt of the taxpayer for the “porpoise,”’ as _ he was termed the other day in an official paper, has : always been there. - It originates in jealousy...better pay, better hours, ’ better working conditions, better holidays, better sick leave, better everything, and at the end of it all, better by far pensions. It’s really not his fault that he is so cossetted. All these advantages of the good working life were thrust upon him by eager politicians, competing in the choice of superlatives to describe what Parliament — until recently — unanimously has agreed is “the best .| ‘ public service in the world.” " Not, mind you, that he ever attempted to.deny it, much less refuse the rich dividends this exalted _ ~ Feputation paid. ‘Who would, in these self-seeking parts, spurn honors ” and riches thrust upon them? ” Only two denizens of the Ottawa Establishment in the last 40 years. Two politicians, surprisingly enough. ‘The New Democrats’ Stanley Knowles who resisted attempts both to appoint him permanent Speaker or promote him to the Senate. And he refused, as did - John Diefenbaker, to accept those parliamentary pay raises piled on parliamentary pay raises in em- barrassing profusion. ; Dief even refused for nearly a year to cash his parliamentary cheques, but he, like Stanley Knowles, finally buckled under the scorn and pressure of other parliamentarians who accused them of hypocrisy. They took the money but theyndidn’t run — instead they bitched about it being a ripoff, sounding off each time it happened. . The veneration of the public servant into super- _being paid super-salaries and accorded super-, privileges such as his very own reserved parking space for free when taxpayers pay through the nose, seems to have started with former Prime Minister Lester Pearson. He was a public servant L..mself, all his life, you see, * go he had to be special, or how else would he have made it to the Liberal leadership and the Prime Minister’s office? : . §o the veneration of te public service built from there with few voices raised in argument, much less protest. Until, well, recently is the best way to put it. The difference of opinion grew and blew into what — nas become a storm of outrage. A high government officer himself, the Auditor - General has put it on the record that the public service is only about 60 per cent productive. Try that figure in private enterprise and see what happens. . ; , a High public figures, like Privy Council Clerk Michael Pitfield gracefully accepted $97,000 in severance pay when former Prime Minister Clark fired him and — splendid fellow — refunded $10,000 when Prime Minister Pierre Trudeau rehired him in only a few months. Long horrified at its rapidly worsening taxpayer image, one of the biggest public service unions the other day conducted a survey, asking the question, in broad terms: when you think of a civil servant of what creature are you reminded? Among the unflattering replies were ‘‘snail’’ and “mollusk.” Nobody mentioned the ‘Invisible Man,” which the public servant becomes after lunch Fridays with the phones going unanswered and business stalling as the staff stampedes to the parking lots. Ah, the four and a half day week. a ‘ LETTERS WELCOME The Herald welcomes its readers comments. All letters to the editor of general public interest will be printed. We do, however, retain the right. to refuse to print letters on grounds of possible libel or bad taste. We may also edit letters for style and Length. All letters to be considered for publication must be signed. ¥, By JACK REDDEN OTTAWA (UPC) — In the next few weeks the federal cabinet will decide the ' finalists in the competition to build six frigates, the last ‘major purchase in a mullti- billion dollar rejuvenation of Canada’s armed forces. The new ships, the 1B long- range patrol aircraft that began arriving last week, the 137 CF-16 fighter aircraft ordered in April and the 133 . West German Leopard tanks that began arriving last fall represent an almost com- plete. re-equipping of the armed forces. Presiding over a renewal of the armed forces is not something Prime Minister Pierre Trudeau sought when he came to power 12 years ago, or something for which ° he likely wants to he remembered, - However, the flurry ‘of recent activity in military purchases — the culmination of decisions madejn the mid- - 1970s ~- fits the mood of. detente-in-retreat that has enveloped the world since the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan. . Defence Minister Gilles Lamontagne says the frigate program, $1.5 billion: in 1977 dollars, will enter the 15- month design stage in two or three months. The current list of five consortiums will - be narrowed to two or three to compete for the final contract. “We do hope to get a decision as soon as we can," ‘ Lamontagne said Thursday when he was in Nova Scotia ‘to take possession of the first Aurora patrol plane. ‘That means 1986 is still possible (for delivery) if we decide pretty soon.” a With the arrival of the first new frigate, the last of Canada’s major obsolete equipment will start to be, phased-out in favor of the weapons that will carry the ‘country into the next cen- tury. . It is an area where reality has overwhelmed hopes, where once-popular musing by Trudeau about the ‘changing world has been - replaced by the neéd to satisfy both domestic and foreign demands for stronger armed forces, “If the application of out-. of-date military strategies to alliances with old and trusted friends might lead not to the desired deterrent effect but instead . to provocation and to obstacles ‘world peace, to detente,” Trudeau told the House of Commons 11 years ago, “then these strategies must be re-examined,” In the current cold-war atmosphere there is less concern about “provocation and obstacles to detente” than at any previous time in Trudeau's time in power. .. Trudeau himself said during the election cam- paign that returned him to office that the Soviet Union had never wavered from its |. A hard, cold-war look now | | - dramatically at long-term goal of expansion. 7 United western action was needed to meet the threat, he ‘said. The old military stategies’ years ago are still going strong. . -. ‘ All but four of the 19 long- range patrol aircraft will be stationed on the east coast to ensure Canada fulfills its anti-submarine obligations ‘to the North American Treaty Organization. Canadian membership ‘in the. North American Air ‘Defence Command was extended for a year May 12 and — although the period was shorter than usual ,to allow. a review of the agreement — everyone ‘ expects a renewal next year. _ > When Trudeau. became ‘prinie minister he attempted to ease Canada away from fears of Soviet expansionism by pointing out that the poverty of the developing world also posed a danger to Canadian assistance to the Third World increased first. However, spending restraint since the mid-1970s has kept - the amount of aid almost unchanged except for in- flation, =... In contrast, the. armed forces, which had been Tunning down under Trudeau's original policies, won a guarantee in 1976 of an annual budget increase of 3 percent more than the in- * flation rate.. This change doesn't necessarily indicate , Trudeau changed his basic that Trudeau doubted a few © hopes during his long tenure. Some circumstances changed and he also became more aware of, political necessities, - — The concern of allies, who are important to ‘a trading’ - nation like Canada for more than’ military reasons, put . pressure on the government’ to loosen the purse strings. Sympathy for the military .. -has been rising faster than concern with the plight of the developing world, especially as the growth of the in- ’ dustrial world slows to the lowest level the . post-war generation has known. _ In demonstrating he has— not entirely abandoned his hopes, Trudeau this year’ proposed'an ambassador for disarmament. Canada also remains one of the more generous ” providers of foreign aid, and Trudeau ‘has a rapport with several Third World leaders. _ But in 1969 he said his - government intended ‘“‘to reorganize our resources and our energies to play a role in the world as it is, not to dream of things as they were,” _ - When it came to Trudeau’s hopes to divert tax ex-. penditures - from weapons, the world “as it is,"’ turned out ta be very similar to the © world as it was. SE WE BORN of Se yastact? K Beta iy tad MOP By DEB van der GRACHT SALMON ARM, B.C. (UPC) — An urgent siren shatters the mountain silence. Within seconds, four burly young men scramble out of nowhere for strategically- hung blue helmets and yellow, fire-resistant wool suits. These they don quickly, automatically, then pick up equipment as they dash from their tents to a waiting helicopter, rotor blades whirling. With military precision, they check each others’ sults, harnesses and clips. Everything must be perfect. Then one of the four, clearly | in charge, signals the others into the helicopter, where they sit with grim faces. The helicopter lifts off, banking away to a nearby mountainside where smoke billows from a small forest fire. : While the helicopter hovers, three of the men rappel down a rope to the tree-covered ground below, then wait while the fourth lowers an orange bag stuffed with firefighting equipment to them. Another signal, and lhe helicopter rolls away. The three take out their tools and begin the job of putting out the fire. They're called rappellers — they’re part of Jim Dunlop's and the B.C, Forest Service's elite ““Rapattack” team — and they're making firefighting history In North THEY’RE SPECIALISTS Elite team fighting fires America by lowering themselves cut of helicopters on ropes to douse otherwise inaccessible fires. . Even raging blazes like the one that has ravaged some 275,000 acres near Kenora, Ont. in the last week usually start in one tree, says Dunlop, a wiry, 20-year veteran of the B.C. Forest Service who started the Rapattack (rappel attack) program in 1977, The specialized teams are called in to put out fires - burning in remote dense brush or on mountainsides — places that nermal sup- pression crews would take hours, perhaps days, to— reach — wilhin hours after they start, while they’re still . small, The rappellers, university and college students who were looking for a summer job with a difference, work out of a camp on the out- skirts of Salmon Arm, a small interior community about 270 kilometers (160 miles} northeast of Van- couver, c “It’s fun, it’s exciting and it’s a summer job," says 21- year-old microbiclogy student Dave Butcher. The crack squad has already saved the B.C. government thousands of doliars by dousing blazes before they get out of hand. The rappelling method was pioneered in 1971 by former University of B.C. professor Bob Henderson, who developed it as an alternative to the ‘more expensive use of water bombers or the time- consuming practice of marching men through dense brush on the ground to tough-toreach fires, __In 1977, Dunlop contacted Henderson, by then a private consultant with his own rappelling team, and asked to. be trained in ‘the method. B.C, is still the only place in North America fighting fires with the rappelling method, theugh the U.S. Forest Service, which also learned the technique from Henderson, has used it oc- casionally, . This year, when training's finished and the carefuily- chosen new recruits are certified as rappellers, Dunlop will have four four- man crews and one three- man crew working under him. ‘ When they're not fighting fires — or practising One More Time the precise procedure that ends with the stomach-churhing drop from the helicopter skids 200 feet above the ground — they exercise, help put the finishing touches on their newly-built camp or just plaln enjoy themselves, Most members of the team are either studying forestry or plan to after spending an exciting summer danglin; out of helleopters. . “T was insclences, but now I'm golng-into forestry next year,” said Bruce Blackwell, 21, of Vancouver, “Tt’s a great job,’ agrees Steve Westby, 20, a rugged- looking forestry student who started with Dunlop when he . was 17 and now heads his own rappel team as the ‘spotter’ “It's like being paid for * getting in shape.” That's a slight un- derstatement when one considers Steve and his team may spend up to 36 hours in the brush putting a fire out with as little as four hours sleep. , . Fi Then, after checking with their bare hands in the rubble to make sure the blaze is out cold (“If you burn your fingers, you know you've got more work to do"), the crew spends up to’ six hours building a rough ‘helipad’ so the copter can Jand and pick them up. Dunlop rules the woodsy roost with a strict hand, Those unfortunate enough to make a mistake while practising rappels from a 50- foot high tower hear about it in no uncertain terms while they're on the ground doing pushups as punishment. But the rappellers take it all in stride. “He yells a Jot and his language ‘can get pretty bad,’’ says Westby. “But that’s good, because we have to learn to do it right.” . Amistake at 200 feet could be fatal, but so far, no one has had anything worse than a sprained -ankle. And if Dunlop has his way, that will always be the case. " PERSKY'S PERSPECTIVE. By STAN PERSKY doesn’t add up to a country... oe the Blue-Eyed Arab At which point, Canada gets reduced to a desk drawer in a bureaucrat's office in Ottawa. Unfortunately, Fierre Trudeau's constitutional talks, commencing June 9, aré unlikely to slow down the consequences. of the Second Law of Ther- modynamics, which are more advanced in Canada than in the rest of the universe. Of course, one can always hope. In this year of miracles — after all, who would have expected neither a postal nor a baseball strike? —maybe the provinces will be able to agree on something before entropy or Armageddon sets in. But don't bet on it. out ’ ‘The things the constitution-constructors are likely to ‘agree on will only minimally strengthen the northern mirage that passes for a nation, Language rights will be entrenched (it sounds something like planting asparagus, doesn’t it?). The Senate, which was never more than a political porkbarrel, will be reformed into a provincial parlor game. Contro) over a few ~ misbegotten public dollars will be shuffled (why not let the provinces run the Wednesday night Bingo?). There is. even some talk of enshrining regional representation on the Supreme Court, though I must { admit, as one who preserves a scrap of respect for conservative idealism, it escapes me how the quality of mercy is improved by such a_ notion. But on the issue of non-renewable natural resources, which might form the basis of a national economy, expect nothing. ae It all began with a mistake. The founding fathers, me * who were feeding lumps of coal to the new-fangled . steam engines, gave the original four provinces ownership of their mineral resources in’ the 1967 British North America Act beeause they thought this would give them “adequate revenue for performing their limited functions,” as constitutional authority Gerald LaForest puts it in Natural Resources and Public Property Under the Canadian Constitution (admittedly, not the sort of thriller that keeps you up at night). bobo When Canada purchased what is.now most of the western end of the country from the Hudson's Bay _ Company in 1870, it was “clearly envisaged that the resources of the area would pass to Canada to be administered for the benefit of the whole country."” In fact, the 1905 acts creating Alberta and Saskatchewan (happy 75th birthday, gang) reaffirmed this, stating that mineral right were to be “administered by the Government of Canada for the purposes of the Dominion.” It wasn’t until 1930 that the three Prairie provinces acquired ownership of minerals, oil and gas from Ottawa. ; oo As former Oilweck Magazine editor Earle Gray writes, “There will be some national sharing of Canada’s national petroleum wealth, or there will be no Canadian nation,” — Of course, there are several hundred subsidiary questions. For instance, what would be the best way to manage such a money-maker?. Despite the risk of being mistakenly identified as Boris, your friendly KGB agent, I can’t, for the life of me, see the ad- | vantage of letting a bunch of multinational (read American) monsters pocket the profits. Yes, I realize that turning the entire operation over to People’s ’ Petrocan is naked socialism, but what’s wrong with it? (Maybe the Surrey Chamber of Commerce or the Western Canadian Independence Party could write in ‘and explain it to me.) In fact, former premier. Dave Barrett, during’ one of those fits of pique against Ot- tawa that periodically afflict provincial leaders, half- seriously made.a similar proposal. But mild-manner socialism aside, as oilman Gray notes, “Canada is the only large oil-producing nation where the rewards of public ownership of petroleum are not widely shared on a national basis,” He adds, “If public revenues from all of Canada’s oil and gas — in Alberta, the Arctic, the Atlantic — were shared nationally, it would take the sting out of world oil .prices and provide a massive of transfusion of economic and political well-being.” It would also lower your taxes. Of course, I hate to admit that Pierre Trudeau's right about anything just as much as the next person. But when he talks about “strong central govern- ment,” he’s right. Not because it will provide better government than provincial anarchism (it won't). But because it adds up to a nation. : , CC — ~ LETTERS WELCOME _The Herald welcomes its readers comments. Ail letters to the editor of general public interest will be printed. We do, however, retain the right . to refuse to print letters on grounds of possible libel or bad taste. We may also edit letters for style and length. All letters to be considered for ' publication must be signed. A. _ _ J