Mil tell ’m where | stand’ 5 Herridge (NDP that he h t e has i ead editorial in tten; ers’ Voive to coe of NDP Na- &r T. C. Dougias. g yetial — “what's ts fh the NDP» — ~ furious attack ; dge and Reeve “loney of Mount- P as “Mine Mill - the editorial’s . Want to know Sit,” Herridge ea ntemattem in no un- Naltensy Were I stand. a De ; Thats: ‘ tbeng 7e kind of thing Ents 0 € door to gov- mh Ting in things : ey arbitration. tion in vied at the sug- oe © editorial that oney. ®body gives . support the OWN it, Al 3 Writer, whoever suet the NDP © in terms of kind of cor- has to be & suggestion Isgusting and any serious © members of f the United Ss my riding, One, @YS and means ng with the Mine Mill at ay, Bet fee the raids and thay S°t €r to do the ep, MUst be done. Ss 8e he Ww { our shoulders k Whe : vith SO we can Paper's insolent demand threat to NDP democracy HE April issue of Miners’ Voice, published by the United Steelworkers Union of America, carries an editorial which virtually, lays clam to ownership of the New Femo- cratic Party on behalf of the Steelworkers Union. The opening paragraph in- forms us that “The United Steel- workers of America does not stint its money or manpower in backing the New Democratic Party . . . Steelworker full-time staff representatives contribute generously to the party’s coffers by way of salary checkoff. Thou- sands of rank and file Steelwork- ers’ are party members and workers. The union is the party’s largest Canadian labor affiliate.” All this is to the good. For- ward-looking Canadians would like to see all unions give similar support to the NDP. They would like to see all unions affiliated to the NDP and the. senseless ban against some unions imposed by the party on the instigation of Steelworker leaders removed. But the recital of assistance given to the NDP by the Steel- workers is only to lay a founda- tion for the Miners’ Voice edi- torial’s claim of Steelworker ownership of the party. It bears a marked resemblance to em- ployers’ arguments laying a foundation for their claims of “managements’ rights”. The editorial goes on to say: “One takes for granted that the party’s politicians reciprocate this solid support. One could at least expect that they would not HE'S THE MOST CONSCIENTIOUS SUPERVISOR IN THE PLANT ” ignore, dismiss or condone mali- cious attacks on the Steelwork- ers by the union’s opponents.” Who are the Steelworker “op- ponents” the editorial wants NDP “politicians” to take up cudgels against? Stelco? Dofas- co, which is unorganized? Algo- ma or Inco? — No! It is the Mine, Mill and Smelter Workers Union, harass- ed and raided by the Steelwork- ers for the vast 16 years. The editorial in Miners’ Voice calls Steelworker cannibalism a policy of building “one powerful mine union.” But it happens that a great many NDP members, along with the majority of union- ists across the country, oppose union raiding no matter what label is put on it. It is this healthy opposition by NDP members and leaders to dirty wars against their fel- low workers which riles the Miners’ Voice. So the editorial thunders: “For some years we have suffered these antics (op- position to raiding — A.D.) in silence. We think the time has come when responsible NDP leaders and members had better declare themselves. We want to know where they sit.” Shades of all reactionary poli- ticians! For years the old-line party politicians charged the NDP is ruled by the big union “paymasters’’. Now, as if to con- firm this charge, the editorial in Miners’ Voice declares. “We want to know where they sit.” In other words, he is saying, we pay the fiddler and are en- titled to call the tune. The editorial singles out two NDP personalities as special culprits. One is the veteran MP for the Kootenays, H. W. Her- ridge. The other is Leonard Quebec convention Full union rights - “Civil service in Quebec will never again be what it used to be.” This is the way Le Travail, organ of the Confederation of National Trade Unions, recently described the first convention of the Quebec Union of Civil Serv- ants (Syndicat des fonction- naires provinciaux du Quebec). The convention made it clear that Quebec ‘civil servants are pressing for the same rights in the province as are accorded to all other categories of workers: . right to association, right of affiliation to a central organiza- tion, right of free negotiation and the right to strike if nego- tiations fail to bring agreement. If these objectives are to be attained then Quebec civil serv- ants and the labor movement . will have to win a number of amendments to the Quebec Labor Code (Bill 54) and to the Civil Service Act. In his report to the March 13, 14 and 15 convention, Presi- dent Raymond Fortin stressed the union’s demand for the Mahoney, Township. Their crime? Holding different opinions on what constitutes trade union unity and worker solidarity than the writer of the editorial in Miners’ Voice. The insolent demand that NDP leaders and members toe the Steelworker line, or else, is ob- viously based on the editorial opinion that Steelworker policy is automatically NDP policy by virtue of Steelworker dollars and manpower. reeve of Mountjoy The fact that such an assump- tion can be held by a Steelwork- er editor thrusts the fundament- al question of party democracy to the fore in the NDP. The NDP is organized on the basis of membership clubs, con- stituency associations and union and farm affiliations. This is what gives the party a promise of parliamentary success. But the promise can only be fulfilled through the united efforts of the party’s members, affiliates and supporters around a genuine anti-monopoly platform. The dictatorial stand of the Miners’ Voice editorial can serve only to disunite. Workers and farmers desiring to get a steady succession of Liberal and Con- servative governments off their backs are not going to be en- couraged to vote NDP only to be dictated to by a section of the'r own arty, no matter how b’g or rich that section is. And this includes the members of the Steelworkers union. Canadians who want a gov- ernmental change.from the old parties want democratic govern- ment free from domination or corruption of any kind. This the NDP can give, providing it holds high the banner of equal rights within the party, and for all democratic - minded people in conducting the affairs of the country. The fortunes of the NDP in the forthcoming federal election concerns masses of people far beyond the ranks of the party. These masses need to be assured that the democratic aims of the NDP will be upheld without fear . or favor. Poll-emics? Union officials in West Ger- many have concluded that pub- lic opinion polls don’t amount to much when husbands and wives are questioned on the same issue. Recently a nation- wide ll was’ conducted on whether German husbands helped their wives with the housework. Exactly 75 percent of the husbands said yes, they did. But only 51 percent of the wives said they got any help from their spouses. to raiding. Steelworker local hits raids When five delegates of Steelworkers Local 3302 in Van- ccuver reported back to their membership after a meeting with the Cominco Mine Mill council in Trail, a surprise visi- tor attended the Steelworker membership meeting—M. J. Fenwick, editor of the Miners’ Voice. He witnessed a unanimous vote of approval for the local’s actions by a record membership turnout and a unanimous disapproval of his own raiding policies. The Vancouver Labor Council also endorsed the action of the Stelworker local which has a long history of opposition ing for recognition of right,” he added, “if we did not intend to make full use of it. That is why we strongly favor the affiliation of our union to a central organization which can be no other than the Confede- ration of National] Trade Unions.” Never in the history of the Quebec labor movement, Fortin continued, was the need for a this . for civil service remain no misunderstanding on that point,” he said. “There would be no use fight- central organization so clearly shown asin the struggle which led to the freedom of civil serv- ants, “Our union can only remain genuine if we join the thou- sands of workers who are al- ready contributing in various ways to the social promotion of all salaried workers.” The convention indicated its support for Fortin’s suggestion that the union wov'd seek affi- liation to the CNTU if the right to affiliation is won in forth- coming legislation. May 7, 1965—PACIFIC TRIBUNE—Page 5