‘Cut from social services’ _ By ALD. HARRY RANKIN Evan Wolfe, the provincial Minister of finance, has gleefully “Mnounced that the provincial 8overnment had a surplus of $213.7 Mhillion at the end of the last fiscal Year. Personally I don’t think that ‘this is anything to crow about; the -80vernment should be ashamed of the means used to create this ‘Surplus. ; The surplus was created by fastic cuts in services essential to the people of British Columbia. One of the most obvious was the, ‘Cutbacks in hospital grants, which forced hospitals to cut staff and teduce care facilities. ~ A second means of achieving the Surplus was to cut back substantial- Y on the government’s share of ducation costs. This was done by Mposing a continually increasing ic mill rate on homeowners, plus forcing school boards to pay all the ‘SO-called ‘‘extras’’, all of them *ssential but not within the govern- Ment’s definition of basic needs. Then we all remember how Bill ander Zalm, when he was Minister Of Human Resources, cut back ‘Welfare and in one year alone saved © government over $100 million, at the expense of the poor and the oyattutey the handicapped and the Why all these cutbacks? To save Money for the people? To reduce taxes? Not on your life! The government already has ans for the disposition of the Surpluses it is accumulating by cut- ting Services to people. One is to build a $50 million ridge across the Fraser River to nacis Island. What many people May not know is that this whole and is owned by one family, the Wealthy British Grosvenor family, Which bought it in 1950 at a very ©W price and developed it as a Private industrial park, and a very Profitable one too. Ow the citizens of British Col- Provincial surplus allocated for rich umbia, if the provincial government has its way, will pay to build a bridge to this privately owned in- dustrial park, a bridge that should be built and paid for by the family corporation that’s raking in all the benefits. Z Then there’s the projected $250 million new highway from Hope to Merritt. Why all this money for one short highway? Is this being done for the benefit of the residents? The answer, of course, is that a whole number of new mines are be- ing developed in that area. They are owned by big corporations, many 'of them foreign controlled. They want a shorter route to the coast. And again the people of British Columbia are being asked to foot the bill. What is happening in B.C. is that under the guise of restraint, cut — backs are being made in all sorts of services to people. The savings are then diverted to services to the big corporations. Is that surprising? It shouldn’t be. What, after all, is the role of the Provincial government in a society such as ours? Isn’t it to take from the people and give to the big cor- porations? And isn’t that what it’s doing? The ‘‘free enterprisers’’ like to scream about the virtues of working hard for your money (at any wages offered), about the adverse effects of government interference in the economy (whenever the government imposes even the mildest restric- tions on them), and about the need — to cut the ‘‘lazy bums”’ off welfare . and unemployment insurance. But these corporate bums are the first ones to stand in line with their hands out when the government distributes: its° surplus. They hate socialism for the poor, but they sure like the socialism for the rich prac- ticed by the present B.C. govern- ment. Which is why they put it there, of course. Chilean consul’s role | ___ Continued from page 1 ; and development department head, 4 Z Maeno. Maeno urged the . ieee committee to release the | Nd because Hydro’s real estate 1; Columbia: Estate Company, “Ose president is Hydro chairman “de ert Bonner, would participate Hye’ development of the land. alte 0’s interests were also looked Hew; by Socred minister Jim me tt, a director of Hydro, and a | ~“Mber of the cabinet committee. | vin Ording to Vancouver Pro- ia columnist Allen Garr, Hydro Glo Previously made a deal with o. Ucester that if the land was suc- it fully released from the reserve, Would swap some nearby land fb Hydro, but still in the | Gy €, for an equal amount of 5 eff Ucester’s land. Hydro would, in With ‘develop agricultural land |, Out becoming involved in the = lang OversY of attempting to have | y,. taken out of the reserve. i ane has ended up right in the tee of the controversy, dent Yer, and has been caught in a ‘te. © manipulate, rather than pro- € public interest. : Canadians for Democracy in “©, a Vancouver based solidarity © » this week questioned the role. uin Grubner, the Chilcan inland deal questioned consul, in the land deal. Committee spokesperson John Radosevic said that Grubner’s financial dealings in B.C. are questionable because he is an official agent of the fascist junta. The suggestion in news reports that Chilean money may be involv- ed in Gloucester Properties 1s reason enough for the provincial » government to suspend the decision and have an investigation, he said. “Losing farmjand is bad enough, but it apears that our loss may be the junta’s gain,” Radosevic said. “The junta has no business in Canadian affairs, and neither does its agent.” Grubner’s company bought the 626 acres in 1971 for $3.2 million. It. plans to sub-divide the property, have it re-zoned industrial and sell it~ in acre lots. Loretto estimates that the land will sell for about $75,000 per acres, which would net Gloucester a possible profit of $3.1 million — a 100 percent capital gain without making any improvements to the property. ; Not including Gloucester's pro- perty, there are 5,928 acres of land in the upper Fraser Valley 3,875 acres remain vacant. /—— PROVINCIAL NOTES Citizens walk out of forest advisory cttee. QUEEN CHARLOTTE CITY — Public members of the Queen Charlottes Public Advisory Com- mittee voted Sept. 9 to disband their committee, ‘‘disgusted’’ by the stonewalling tactics of forest com- pany representatives. The committee, set up as a vehi- cle for communication between the public and the B.C. Forest Service, was ‘‘just too polarized,’’ accor- ding to Gary Edenshaw, prominent Haida spokesman and ex- committee member. Edenshaw charged that the com- pany representatives voted con- sistently in the interests of the big logging companies. ““These guys, 5 from Rayonier, have been sitting on the committee all along offering vir- tually nothing in the way of a policy and voting against anything that may suggest a tree might be left standing,’’ he said. One motion by committee mem- ‘| ber Paul George to place a morator- ium on handlogging of the South Moresby area while under review by the South Moresby Task Force fail- ed 6-5, while the subsequent motion opposing the moratorium passed 6-5. It was the final straw. ‘‘At the last motion it became obvious that we were all wasting our time,”’ said Edenshaw. Disagreements over treee farm forest licences, allowable annual cuts, environmental concerns, over- cut and operability plagued the committee since its inception. ‘‘The company representatives were con- tinually in conflict of interest,’’ George stated. The recommendations coming out of PAC were not listened to by the B.C. Forest Service, according to the chairman. ‘‘As the issues became more controversial, less at- tention was paid by the Forest _Ser- vice,’’ he said, and the sources of information ‘‘dried up’? when PAC got closer to the ‘‘real’’ forestry issues. At their last meeting, PAC received a letter from the minister of forests telling them they ‘‘could not participate in the renewal of any upcoming tree farm _licences,’’ Edenshaw said. “The public members of the committee came to the clear realiza- tion that we were set up as an illu- sion of public participation, so we voted to disband,’’ he added. Budget surplus linked to hike in income taxes VICTORIA The much vaunted surplus in the Socred budget was due in large part to the 23 percent increase realized from personal income taxes, Dave designated for industrial use, and Aly oe TELKWA — The Save the Bulkley Committee, a coalition of en- vironmental groups in the Northwest erected this sign at the con- fluence of the Telkwa and Bulkley Rivers as part of the campaign to halt the proposed Kemano Il dam. The project, sought by Alcan, would reduce substantially the flow of three rivers as well as flooding several thousand acres. Stupich, NDP opposition finance critic said Monday. Undeterred by the fact that the total personal income of British Columbians “‘stood virtually still last year,’’ the provincial govern- ment ‘‘took a huge increase out of the population in personal income taxes,’’ Stupich said. He went on to explain how the 9.4 percent increase in the total per- sonal income of the population had been all but wiped out by an 8.1 percent inflation rate and a 1.5 in- crease of new residents in the pro- vince. It was under these conditions that B.C. residents had to dish out more money in personal income taxes. Stupich pointed out that hospital cutbacks, mortgage foreclosures and the failure of the government to start a comprehensive Denticare program and rapid transit *‘co- exists with all the publicity about surpluses.” 33 ooo “Tf times are so good under the Socreds, why are most people worse off?’’ he asked. Vernon labor backs Nilsson VERNON — ‘‘Civic democracy and open government’’ will set the stage for Vernon’s upcoming municipal elections, according to Bert Nilsson, secretary-treasurer of the Vernon Labor Council. Nilsson, who narrowly missed election last time, will be running for alderman a second time with the endorsement of the Labor Council. STH past undemocratic way of doing municipal business was the main reason why Vernon citizens were prepared to pay a Vancouver firm the sum of $18,000 to make an in- quiry into city hall,’’ Nilsson said. The report they produced was “critical” of the city administrator council’s . —Hal Griffin photo and ‘‘the leadership given by the council,’’ he added. Nilsson feels that this issue as well as the controversial issue of urainium mining will make this elec- tion a ‘‘lively one for Vernon.”’ Rupert cannery workers hard hit by UI cuts PRINCE RUPERT — The bitter forecasts about the new unemploy- _Mment insurance regulations hitting seasonal workers first and hardest, has come true for hundreds of unemployed fishing industry workers in Prince Rupert. Due to the stiffer requirements they have to meet, the majority of cannery workers are not eligible to collect unemployment insurance benefits. Of the 151° shoreworkers employed at Canadian Fishing’ Co.’s Oceanside plant, thrée> — employees were eligible to collect benefits when 'flie plant closed down abruptly at the end of August. Emi- ly Brown, a top seniority cannery worker, is still ‘one week short of the 16 weeks of insurable employment she needs to qualify for benefits. Other plants such as Cassiar’s Prince Rupert plant, B.C. Packers’ Port Edward and Seal Cove plants have closed down most of their operations, except for maintenance . work and a little canning. Most of their employees won’t be able to scrape together the minimum 20 weeks of insured earn- ings they will need to qualify for benefits, that is if they didn’t collect benefits last year. If they did receive benefits last year, they will have to match every week that they received then with a week of insurable work (20 hours a week) this year, up to a minimum of 16 weeks. Brown managed to get 12 weeks of work at Oceanside, and like many other shoreworkers, did janitorial work at the plant for as long as she could in the hopes of qualifying. She worked an adci- .' tional three weeks but still needed ae : DUNCAN — B.C. Federation of Labor unemployment committee coordinator Bill Dennison brought the Federation’‘s travelling in- formation van on unemployment insurance to Duncan last week after two days in Victoria. The Federation information campaign is aimed at educating claimants and the public of their rights and (warning them against usual pitfalls in applying for UI. another week. An expected 2,300 are expected to register for employment with the local Prince Rupert Manpower of- fice in the next two weeks, but with a 30-35 percent unemployment rate, work prospects are grim. Earlier this year, Prince Rupert } shoreworkers formed a salmon ex- | port committee protesting the loss of jobs caused by the growing quan- tities of unprocessed fish sent abroad. They staged demonstra- tions and rallies, earlier this year and made representation to the new federal fisheries minister James McGrath. : Prince Rupert fishing industry workers are planning a rally Oct. 11 to coincide with the B.C. Federa- tion of Labor’s Vancouver rally protesting the federal government’s new UIC regulations. - PACIFIC TRIBUNE—OCTOBER 12, 1979—Page 3-