Delegates tackle tasks of peace, disarmament figes TORONTO — In its two-day conference, March 8-9, the Cana- dian Peace Congress activated cross-Canada plans for its work, with an eye to the sharpening dangers of world conflict. Despite a tightly packed schedule, the close to 100 delegates, along with observers and guests, focus- sed on, debated and analyzed both Canadian and international events as they relate to peace and détente. A demand for Canada’s ending ofthe North American Air Defence agreement with the USA, and for a positive stand by the Canadian Government at the Madrid follow-up meeting to the Helsinki Final Act, were among the strong expressions in the several resolu- tions agreed to on opening day. Unlike day two, pine ston ar shops, plenary sessions at guests with specialized knowledge were open to the pub- lic, the first day studied and en- dorsed an action program for in- tensified work, debated resolu- tions, decided on_ structural changes in the organization, and elected a new executive for a ear term. sc aang more than 30 years of activity in Canada for world and peaceful co-existence of systems, were representatives from peace councils in six pro- vinceS, and spokesmen of 12 af- filiated organizations. , Peace Congress president, Dr. John Morgan, faced head-on im: of the contentious issues raised with the peace organiza- tion. It would be a “disaster for the Canadian peace movement,”’ he said, “‘if we ever lost our de- fining characteristics,’ which in- ernments’’ and systems, and ee ndemnation of those which d on war. ee Inheritance Afghanistan was one of those issues which concerned peace workers. ““We think you have to The floating bank rate The Bank of Canada’s decision to float give people some background,” Morgan said. In so ordinary a source as the Encyclopaedia Britannica, one can read what that government inherited. Even meagre information can enlighten people, he said, ‘‘about life in that land where something like half of the babies died before they had a chance to live, where 10% of the population still practices polygamy,’ and where, unlike the Muslim movement in some other places, “‘there are bitterly reactionary aspects to the Muslim movement tied in with feudal land-owning,”’ and other blocks to social progress. ‘ Morgan, for 35 years a Unita- rian minister, urged people to “think a moment about what they (the new Afghan Government au- thorities) were trying to do, and then contemplate the terrific ten- sions ... and what a remarkable opening this gives to outsiders who can play on the tempo: disaffection of people ...”’ But, he advised, “‘ask yourself the question: Do you want Afghanis- tan to go back to what it was?”’ He predicted that in the long run Afghanistan will become an- other centre of stability and _ peace. During the conference Mac Makarchuk, New Democratic member of the Ontario Legisla- ture, who visited Afghanistan in 1979, participated in a workshop on the subject, in which a wide range of views’ were expressed ‘and discussed. Morgan’s address led a rapt au- dience over the highlights of the struggle for peace from the end of World War II, and warned of such present dangers as the NATO- U.S. drive to deploy Pershing II and Cruisé nuclear missiles throughout western Europe. While not intercontinental, these’ first-strike weapons are to be placed to serve that purpose, while being defined as tactical. hotes. Action Against NORAD In approving the action pro- gram introduced by Peace Con- gress Executive Secretary Jean Vautour, delegates acknow- ledged as immediate priorities, keeping Canada in the Olympics, creating a public demand for a to get out of the U:S.- ruled NORAD, and pressing the federal government to oppose the U.S.-NATO deployment ofanew family of nuclear missiles in west- em Europe. The program also emphasized action around the Helsinki Final Act, signed by Prime Minister Trudeau in 1975, and the government’s failure to fulfill the ‘‘binding requirement --+ to publicize it as widely as Possible.’’ This abetted systema- tic distortion of the Act’s content. In the Madrid follow-up meeting this August, delegates agreed, Canada should work for “‘concen- tration of the discussion on in- creased cooperation in all fields.”” _Other aspects of the program aimed at building the Canadian Peace Congress, and developing the work of the Trade Union Peace Committee. Among ac- tivities this year will be the or- ganizing of a representative Canadian delegation to attend a World Parliament of the Peoples for Peace, to be held in the capital of Bulgaria, Sept. 23-27. The vigorous demand of the ‘Conference for Canada’s: with- drawal from NATO (the North Atlantic Treaty Organization) was reflected in a resolution cal- ling the pact a “‘violation of the Spirit and letter of the UN Charter ++ a military alliance directed against another group of states”’ resulting in two armed camps. NATO rejects the offer of the Warsaw Pact (which came into being some five years after NATO) of simultaneous dis- solution of the two, the resolution It condemns NATO’s escalation of the arms race and its intention to install almost 600 nu- Ss ILF SZCZEZNY_ PHOTO — John Morgan president of the Canadian Peace Congress stressing a point at the recent Canadian Peace Congress meeting. clear first-strike missiles in Europe, despite the Soviet with- drawal of 1,000 tanks and 20,000 troops from the German Demo- cratic Republic. Likewise the conference urged the Trudeau government ‘‘to let NORAD (North American Air Defence) expire this year’’ as the beginning of a ‘‘fully independent Canadian foreign policy,’’ and for a Canadian role of peacemaker in the world. The conference agreed to begin a country-wide campaign for Canada’s withdrawal before NORAD comes up for renewal in May. Among participants in the con- ference were three members of the U.S, Peace Council, Jose La Luz, Mark Belkin and Katharin Graham. Stan Dalton, chairman of the Toronto Association for Peace, opened proceedings witha greeting from Toronto Mayor John Sewell. African National. Congress spokesman, Yusuf Saloojee, described current developments in South Africa, and in Zimbabwe. Guests who braved the weather to attend a Saturday night ban- quet applauded speaker Mac Makarchuk who contrasted the futility of trade boycotts with the benefits of trade, the outrage of spending billion on armaments and withholding money for social needs. ‘I can tell you, the fellows who make the combines in Brantford (the riding he represents) aren't prepared to accept that (trade boycotts) either. They know very well that it’s not only good economics to continue trading, but it’s also good in terms of try- ing to reach an understanding among the people of the world. And if we don’t reach that under- standing there'll be no world and _ no people.” Timothy Jenkin who, along _ with two fellow political prison- ers, escaped from a maximum security prison in Pretoria, spoke of the liberation struggle in South Africa, and of his speaking mis- . sion on behalf of James Mange, a young Black South African who is under sentence of death in the apartheid state. Peace Congress executive member, and banquet MC, Ellen Lipsius, reported that, owing to. the severe snowstorm and the closing of Toronto airport, the other _ featured speaker, economist Victor Perlo, of New York, was unable to be present. By ALFRED DEWHURST By virtue of control of the market, the its key interest rate bodes no good for working people. Its purpose, says the Bank, is to allow the law of supply and demand to operate in the money market . as it allegedly does in the food market. The Bank further alleges that the floating rate will ‘‘keep interest rates in Canada as low as the economy will allow’’. Does this alleged theory of “‘supply and demand’’ keep prices down at the super-market? It certainly doesn’t as any housewife can testify. Is there any reason to believe that it will keep the price (interest) of loans, mortgages and credit down on the money market? No, there isn’t. It all depends on who controls the supply and demand. * * * ; t It is the big banks that control the money supply in the capitalist world. And, in our times this gives the big banks tremendous leverage over the money’ market and, as a result of this, over the whole economy. In our times hundreds ‘of thousands of small non-monopoly firms in industry and the service sector, small contractors, farmers and so on are virtually in hock to the banks and credit institutions. And ‘literally millions of people across the land are in a similar situation. : Marxism-Leninism in Today’s World It is the big banks that also control the flow of money available for loans, credit and mortgages. The price they charge for money Is quite an effective control over demand. And, if necessity drives a small business man, contractor, farmer or or- dinary citizen to seek credit, mortgage or loan, then the banks and credit houses reap additional benefit through higher rates. * * * In recent years monopolization of the money supply and of the banking and credit industry has made rapid headway. . In most capitalist countries this monopoly control is held by no more than half a dozen banks and in some countries less. In Canada three giant banks control the money supply. Such monopolization takes place Mainly through mergers and takeovers. Another method of establishing control Over money supply which is widely used in Canada is the establishment of a - countrywide network of branches of the big banks. In most cities the three giants are to be found on almost every main intersection. The system of banking and credit in- stitutions we have in Canada is typical of all capitalist countries. This system in- cludes mutual savings banks, loan .and saving societies, insurance companies, trust companies, pension funds ‘and re- tirement savings plans. The main func- tion of all such specialized institutions is to accumulate the savings of the people r investment by the banks at a muc igher rate of return. r * * * - The banks play the major role in the drive of monopoly in general and the state to use the present economic crisis to rationalize industry and production in order to step up the rate of exploitation of the working people. In addition the crisis, which has seeped into every nook and cranny of Canada’s economy, has speeded up the concentration of ° monopoly power into fewer and fewer hands. Bankruptcies and foreclosures are common everyday occurrences. Mergers after mergers take place. All of which are the ‘‘normal’’consequences of capitalist crises, as the more powerful corporations shake off weaker com- petitors in their never-ending quest for ‘super-profits. ; big monopolies manipulate prices, fix them and raise them irrespective of the state of the market. They can even cur- tail production in industries while raising prices as part of their manipulation of production and the market in search of super-profit. — * * * The banking and credit monopolies are the kingpins of the capitalist monopoly system in our country. With State assistance they manipulate interest rates almost at will. When interest rates - ‘rise, the money you have in your pocket is cheapened. What little control the state had over the cost of money was diminished when the Bank of Canada was allowed to float the bank rate. It is a well-known axiom that all matter that floats rises with the tide unless it is firmly anchored down. The same tendency to rise will prevail in the case of the floating bank rate. It will rise as the tide of in- flation rises. = : The floating bank rate is part and par- cel of monopoly’s wholesale attack against the people’s living standards. A united voice can compel the government to restore the anchor it threw away. And restore it on a shorter rope. ~ PACIFIC TRIBUNE—MARCH 21, 1980—Page 9