Ropid transit caught in ‘death trap’ By FRED WILSON Part two of the Greater Van- Couver Regional District’s “high Capacity rapid transit in- vestigation” is about to begin. It Sounds great, but before you grab Aled Coat and make for the subway P, hold on, because rapid transit S never been farther away from pecower Mainland at any time in last five years than it is today. lat is the case despite the Predictable campaign promises of Ost every politician in the Current round of municipal elec- ons, and it is the case precisely , to the actions of some of those Vojicians, Vancouver’s Jack olrich notably, who proclaim €mselves the champions of rapid. ‘ansit. eau is also due to the muddled jg Broach of the GVRD itself which cae oughing ahead with its “high i pacity investigation”, mapping ut the details of where the transit ae will lay and figuring the Mi d of shops that will locate at the ation stops, while admitting €re is no prospect of a rapid ansit system until at least the Mid 1980’s and at the same time oo Ler mie tile, Oe SOF NOS Sah Gee CED: > Fh Oy oa falling quickly into the trap of the frovincial Urban Transit uthority (UTA), which for rapid ASS : = ec KI ERRISDALE MARPOLE —~> ae METROTOWN ip EDMONDS — LANSDOWNE RICHMOND CENTRE 2D transit is nothing short of a death trap. Back in August the GVRD completed part one of its “high capacity investigation” and set out the mid 1980’s framework. Why the delay? The reason offered was a slowdown in population growth, but everyone knew that it was politics causing the traffic jam, as the provincial government was already in the midst of dropping the Urban Transit Authority onto the municipalities. Part one also confirmed what - everyone knew: that the first priority-for a rapid transit line is along Kingsway to New West- minster with a branch line ‘to Surrey. The Arbutus to Richmond line was given second priority. Yet another earthshaking conclusion was that the type of system should be a “light rapid transit system’, as if there ever was any other real possibility. ‘ Now comes part two. It will “determine what steps are necessary to secure rights of way for rapid transit”, decide what kinds of urban development along negotiations would go about the same way: the municipalities would negotiate how — through. property tax, gas tax or hydro tax “We don’t want any briefs,” Nancy Grant, the GVRD’s organizer answered, “‘its supposed to be informal — shirt sleeve stuff. _ We want specifics, not broad policy questions.” To that effect, the GVRD will be holding a series of ten informal public meetings, spaced along the proposed LRT routes, to get the ideas of citizens about how a LRT route will go through their neigh- borhood. “No broad policy questions?” If the GVRD ever needed public input on policy, it is now. g The first broad policy question that has to be addressed is why LRT is being postponed for eight, ten or more years when it is needed now. And the second question has got to be the working out of a strategy to force the provincial government and its agents like Volrich to come to terms and put out the money to begin con- structing what has been studied backwards and forwards. The single largest roadblock at _the present time is the Urban Transit Authority which was cleverly and sinisterly thrown around the GVRD’s neck, almost before they knew what had hap- pened. The UTA, of course, is the provincially appointed board which will, under provincial cabinet direction, plan and run the transit system in B.C., including future improvements like LRT. The UTA will then negotiate five year transit agreements with local governments like the GVRD. Not that there will be anything of substance to negotiate. The ca- binet has already imposed by decree that the province will pay 60 percent and the municipalities 40 percent of transit costs, meaning the deficits. There hasn’t been a firm proposal on the capital and operating costs of LRT, but the the lines would be nice, and “assess the effects that LRT and TRANSIT MAP...GVRD‘S proposed LRT route still a long way from _ highway improvements will have realization. Nishgas outline forest resource Management plan PRINCE RUPERT — Leaving ho doubt of their ability to manage © resources which they claim, the 21st Nishga Tribal Convention held here last week adopted a detailed forest management Tesource plan covering the 5,500 Square mile Nishga land claim in © Nass and Skeena Valleys. The Nishga are currently argaining with the federal 80vernment over the land claim although there is little progress Teported. The forest management plan adopted by the Nishgas is “ignificant because it strengthens €ir demand for control not only Over the land area and traditional lunting, trapping and fishing Nights, but over resources as well. It is also significant because of © Sound resource management Policies projected, in contrast to environmentally and ee omueally dangerous forest ns of th inci : tear e€ provincial govern “Sustained yield planning, Consistent with practical har- Vesting, enlightened forest Management and good silviculture Practices, will be used as a basic <2 in all forested areas available annual harvesting,’’ the polic report said. : eos? Sustained yield is a policy of Tvesting only the amount of | Tees as are being replaced by ‘\others growing to maturity. That (PROVINCIAL NOTES: on each other.” Ek a eg ot ST a a Te i ee —_ : ¥ én Pl F TROLLEY BUSES...that's all the city will have until well into the ‘80's as long as the Urban Transit Authority remains. : — they would raise their share. And the transit deficit for only the existing bus system will hit $86.6 million, without any added LRT costs, by 1985. It is a diabolical scheme to make sure LRT can never be afforded. The worst part of it is that the provincial government finds willing stooges like Volrich who accepted chairmanship of the UTA and now has the job of “negotiating’’ on behalf of the province with the GVRD, and with himself as mayor of Vancouver. White Rock’s mayor McDonald, chairman of the GVRD’s tran- sportation committee, saw through the set up and resigned his seat on the UTA. z . The GVRD really has little choice but to completely boycott any dealings with the UTA. If it refuses to negotiate a_ transit agreement, refuses to accept the costs of transit operations, which after all have been borne by the province, or B.C. Hydro, up to now, the Socreds will have little alter- native to sitting down and working out a whole new deal. It will only be when the stranglehold of the UTA is broken that the details of the LRT will . have any meaning, however much talking about them gives the im- pression that something is being done. There is one detail, however, that part two of the GVRD study should deal with and that is the acquiring of the right of way. The . longer the delay the more that it will cost to buy up the land needed and there is no reason, UTA or not, that the GVRD and the municipal governments concerned can’t put the LRT right of way into a publicily owned land bank right now. How to acquire the right of way is one of the questions that part two wants answers for. That is the kind of decision that needs to be taken, not studied. The land should be bought, or expropriated, at reasonable market values and at the present value, not the inflated ones that the LRT project will create. Because, if properly developed, the LRT corridor could not only give Greater Vancouver an ex- cellent transportation system, but it could also create for municipal governments propery values that could be the basis for progressive social programs which up to now have been out of the reach of civic government. policy was scrapped by the Socred government earlier this year and replaced with a policy of “economic demand” which will allow companies to cut as much as market needs dictate. The multinational forest com- panies that presently hold timber rights in the land claim area will have to go, the Nishgas said, “would be allocated although they “wo od required About 400 people jammed the timber rights for a peri to recover the residual values of the original investment.” During the ‘write off period’, the forest companies’ development plans \would be integrated into the Nishga plan. harvesting permits would be granted on a five or ten year basis, far more limited than the 25 to 45 year terms allowed by the provincial forest act. Priority tasks for implementing the management plan would be the building of access roads and the replanting of understocked areas. The Nishgas put the estimated cost of the project at about $33 million, but they insist that it will benefit the economy of the whole region. “The policies proposed by the Nishga are practical,” the report stated, ‘‘They will also be necessary for the future economic health of this region. Once the Nishga have acquired the right to manage the forest resources of their land claim area, the im- es plementation of these policies is possible provided the B.C. Government and local forest operators will make the reciprocal commitments requested by the Nishga.” Trail USWA president Marv McLean passes TRAIL — The labor movement was shocked last week with the death of United Steelworkers of America Local 480 president Marv McLean. McLean, 37, was felled by a sudden heart attack on Sunday, November 5. Steelworkers’ Hall in Trail, Wednesday, for a memorial ser- vice which heard Steelworkers’ District Three officers Len Stevens and Monty Alton deliver eulogies. McLean became president of : Local 480 in June 1973 at a time Under the Nishga plan, timber when the union was being raided by the Canadian Association of Mechanical and Allied Workers (CAIMAW) and when there was considerable rank and file concern over a poor collective agreement. - It was under McLean’s leadership that the union took on Cominco in 1974 in the long and .bitter four month strike which united the whole community against the company. MARV MCLEAN McLean is also credited with forging the joint bargaining council of Cominco unions, of which he was chairman, and with the western Canada Cominco chain conferences of the union. Local 480 vice-president Larry White has been appointed interim president by the union executive until Local elections April of 1979.. Nuclear power plant planned for Van Island PORT ALBERNI — B.C. Hydro and the Socred government have ‘plans to establish nuclear power plant in B.C. in the near future, NDP MLA for Alberni, Bob Skelly, charged this week. : Skelly was reacting to a public statement the week before by Hydro chairman Robert Bonner that nuclear power will be a fact in B.C. within 10 years ‘whether people like it or not.” - Thedecision to go ahead with the Cheekeye-Dunsmuir transmission line between the Sechelt peninsula and Vancouver Island in spite of public protest against the project “can be-taken as an indication of their commitment to construction of a nuclear power plant on the Island,’”’ he said. Since the tran- smission line is designed to carry three times the projected power requirements of Vancouver Island, “it has no other purpose’, Skelly said, except to ‘connect Van- couver Island to the mainland power grid for the express purpose of setting up a nuclear generating plant on the Island which will ultimately feed into the mainland system.” \ are held in’ Skelly called on the premier who ) is now minister of energy to put a moratorium on the development of the transmission line for five years and to assure Island residents that they “‘will not be used as guinea pigs for Hydro’s nuclear ex- periments.” Coke, Fanta pop hit by Federation ‘Hot’ declaration PRINCE GEORGE — The B.C. Federation of Labor has come to the aid of striking members of the Retail Wholesale and Department Store Union, Local 604, who are engaged in the North’s longest strike at Goodwill Bottling Limited since June 20, 1978. The Federation this week issued a “Hot” declaration against all products of the soft drink bottling plant from its strike bound Prince George plant and from its mt plant in Victoria. The declaration. affects all Coke, Fanta, Canada Dry, Sprite and C-Plus Orange soft drinks sold on Vancouver Island and in the North, from Williams Lake to the Yukon border and from Prince Rupert east to the Alberta border. The Southern Mainland, south of Williams Lake, is not affected by the “Hot” declaration because a different employer bottles and distributes the products in that region. The long strike at Goodwill has seen the company use strikebreakers in an attempt to continue operating and bust the union which is struggling for a first collective agreement. Federation secretary Dave MacIntyre pledged the full support of all affiliates in assisting the Goodwill strikers. . . SR