.. DO GONVEY MY SINCERE APOLOGIES TO YOUR TOOTH FAIRY .... Cartoonists have hailed as a major victory the overturning of a previous Supreme court deci- sion that cartoonist Bob Bier- man had libelled former human resources minister Bill Vander Zalm when he depicted him plucking the wings off flies. The decision by the B.C. Court of Appeals was unani- mous, as all five judges held the cartoon to be ‘‘fair comment.’’ Chief Appeal Court Justice Nathan Nemetz said that ‘‘per- sons accepting political office can expect attack and criticism on the grounds that ‘the public interest requires that a man’s public conduct shall be open to {the most searching criticism.’ ” Bierman appeal ruling seen as major victory Supreme Court Judge Craig Munro ruled last February that Bierman had defamed Vander Zalm with his cartoon and or- dered him to pay the minister $3,500 in damages. The decision, if left intact, was broadly felt to set a danger- ous precedent for cartoonists engaged in political caricature and political comment in Bierman’s cartoons are familiar to readers of the Tribune — his latest is reproduced above — as well as to readers of many daily and weekly B.C. newspapers that carry them. Bonner ‘deceitful’ about hydro rates Continued from page 1 _ ner’s defense of the rate increase as a conservation measure was deceit-: ful, Rush said. Large bulk users continue to have a much cheaper rate per kilowatt hour for electricity than do residential consumers, he said. Major industrial clients of Hydro use over 30 percent of total electric power consumed in the province, but pay 50 percent less per kilowatt hour than residential consumers. The rate increases, together with a leaked report from Hydro last week revealing plans to build major power projects on the Stikine and Liard Rivers by 1990, have shown the government’s energy policy to be hollow, Rush added. In his policy statement minister Bob McClelland promised public input into rate increases and future power projects, but it is clear that B.C. Hydro has nothing but con- tempt for public opinion or the Norman Bethune Classes 1980 First class in this series: The Law: A Socialist Perspective with Ald. Harry Rankin March 2, 8 p.m., in Rms. -L1, L2 & L3 above the Library, Britannia Centre ~ 1661 Napier St., Vancouver Free admission. Everyone welcome. & public interest, the CP leader said. The leaked report from Hydro said that Hydro was considering placing dams on the Stikine and Liard by 1990 but cautioned about putting ‘‘contentious’’ material in. public statements. The plans to dam the Stikine and Liard are part of Hydro’s master plan to overbuild domestic generat- ing capacity in order to plug into a continental energy sharing arrangement with the U.S., Rush charged. The information was hid- den from the public and should have been produced during the Na- tional Energy Board hearings on Hydro’s export license last month, he said. Vancouver city council adopted 26 recommendations aimed at making rapid transit in Greater Vancouver a reality by 1984, but according to the Communist Par- ty, the recommendations are ‘‘like an elaborate blueprint for a skyscraper without a foundation.”’ Communist Party chairman in Greater Vancouver Fred Wilson was one of four speakers before council Tuesday evening in the last of a series of public hearings in Vancouver to assess the findings of the Greater Vancouver Regional District’s high capacity rapid tran- sit study. There is no decision yet to go ahead with rapid transit. That re- quires approval of the GVRD Board, the Urban Transit Authori- ty and the provincial cabinet. “Be under no illusions. It is the cabinet that will make the decision, and they are saying that. we can -have rapid transit if we take it on their terms. They have told us, if. you want rapid transit, take it out of your hide,”’ Wilson said. The GYRD is blindly going along with the province’s dictates in a desperate effort to get rapid transit construction underway, but there is no way of knowing how much it will cost, how much pro- perty taxes and the gas tax will in- crease to pay for it, or how much- fares will be forced to rise under the new financial formula, he said. Vancouver’s director of finance warned last October that current projected income for an LRT system will leave a $12 million an- nual deficit by 1984, and rising in- ‘terest rates have already sugnificantly increased the likely deficit. That will mean big in- creases in property taxes with the three cent per gallon gas tax rising in tandem. There was nothing in the recom- mendations about securing a capital grant from the provincial government, Wilson pointed out, even though the costs of borrowing the money to build the first leg of the system will add more than $9 million to operating costs in 1982 and more than $38 million in 1984, ‘Have you given up the fight for acapital grant from the province?”’ he asked, “‘If you have, say so. But don’t any of you, particularly the mayoralty candidates, come back to us later with a pledge that you will fight for a better deal for Van- PEOPLE AND ISSUES .S. president Jimmy Carter may continue LRT plans a ‘skyscraper — without foundation’-CP — couver from the provincial govern- Wichtxe Wilson’s statement was a refer- ence to mayoralty Candidate Mike Harcourt who as a provincial gov- ernment appointee on the Urban Transit Authority voted for the fin- ancial formula. In debate Harcourt admitted that without capital grants from the senior governments ‘‘there just won’t be any LRT.”’ Harcourt later moved to add a capital grant from the province to the list of rec- ommendations. Harcourt has been under consid- erable criticism from the left for his. A support of the Socred transit for — mula and he attempted to j his support for property taxes a5 @ method of financing transit by SUB gesting that commercial and bust: ness interests would also pay Patt of the costs for transit. Z The logic of that position is that the worse the deal for the G\ from the Socreds, and hence the more property taxes are required to keep thetransit system afloat — the better he will like it because bus! nesses will contribute a share of the tax, Wilson said. Eckardt study ‘just a 4 charade to cover NPA’ By ALD. HARRY RANKIN Now that city council has once again rejected any changeto a ward system in Vancouver, the question has to be asked: Why did mayor Jack Volrich and the NPA set up a ‘special so-called ‘‘government re- view commission’? headed by Judge Eckardt in the first place when they had no intention of making any changes? I charged, at the time, and so did many civic community groups, that their purpose in setting up the commission was two-fold (a) to de- fuse and confuse the issue of a ward system (which voters had support- edin the November, 1978, elections by a 51.7 per cent majority) and (b) to bring certain other changes in the municipal electoral system that the NPA had never raised in the elec- tion campaign. Those changes in- volved increasing the powers of the mayor, increasing the term of of- fice for aldermen, and restrictions on those eligible to run for office. What happened at city council’s meeting on Feb. 12 proved we were’ right. By a vote of 6-4 council rejected a motion to establish a full ward system. By the same vote council decided that the term of office for council, the school board, and parks board be increased from two to three years. The mayor’s powers (appointing committees, etc.) were also increased by a 6-4 vote. So was a resolution that candidates for the mayor’s seat be required to make a $250 deposit; all others $50. Every candidate for any post will a have to file the signatures of voters. These votes indicate quite cleatly that the real purpose in setting UP the so-called government review commission was to bring in thes changes; the rest was a cover-UP: Mayor Volrich and his NPA polit” cal bed-fellows displayed some thing less than political honesty going through this public charade, which, incidentally, cost over $70,000. oa Thechanges voted for by coun! have to go to the provincial legisla — ure, and become law only if and when passed by the legislature a amendments to the Vancouver Charter. This means that anyone or any organization opposed to thesé changes can still make their views known to the provincial govern- ment and lobby the MLAs. How desperately afraid the mayor and the NPA are of a war’ system was illustrated by aldermat Kennedy. He called the advocates _ of the ward system ‘‘civic Marxists”’ who cell by cell were pre paring to take over! Since allmajor cities of Canada — have had the ward system for many — decades, one can’t but wonder at — the power of Marxism in this coun- — try. Poor alderman Kennedy, he 1S _ so far removed from reality that he — really isn’t with it; I think he some- times confuses what he says in council with the speeches he makes to himself in front ofthe bathroom — muror. & his strident demand for an Olympic boycott (although there will be no longer an official » echo from Joe Clark) but Canadian travellers to the Moscow Olympics aren’t about to stay home’on Carter’s or Clark’s say-so, it seems. We were curious since a number of com- mentators were pointing to the tourist dollars “that Moscow won’t get’”’ but weren’t citing any figures, so we contacted the head office of Sears Travel Service, the official travel organiz- ers for the 1980 Summer Games; to get a clearer picture. It wasn’t what some news reports would have us believe. Sears assistant general manager Bob Glazier told.us that there had been some concern that the ‘international situation might affect the Olympic tours but he added, ‘‘there have been very, very few cancellations.”’ And with four months still to go, some 3,500 tours — the package includes Olympic event tickets, hotel and travel — have already been re- served. That’s more than half of the 6,000 seats booked by Sears and Glazier says that he’s “hoping for a sellout.”’ He also told us that many people were wait- ing to see what happened to the Tories in-the election since it was the Clark government which had put Canada on the boycott list, despite widespread opposition. Thousands of people, athletes, spectators and travellers alike, were awaiting the outcome for much the same reason. Now it’s time that a Canadian Olympic boycott went the same way as its Tory originators — down to resounding defeat. : * * * ° : ! n a similar theme, we have a note from a reader Elwyn Patterson in Prince George enclosing a cartoon. ‘‘Like a lot of people to- day,’’ he writes, ‘I am sickened by our country’s backing of the U.S. and its allies, but I have trouble expressing myself in words so lam sending a cartoon I have drawn instead. I hope you can find a use for it and I hope it arrives be- fore the election.”’ As it turned out, we didn’t get it before the election. But we think readers will appreciate it even after the event. PACIFIC TRIBUNE— FEBRUARY 22, 1980—Page 2