November 18th, 1974

as follows:

1. That in the opinion of the Council of The Corporation of the
City of Port Coquitlam John William Scott and Carole Susanna Scott, as
owners of a former road allowance which comprised the other half of
McKenzie Avenue for which complete closure is now sought, do not have
valid reason for withholding their consent; and

2. That the usual rule requiring consent of the adjacent owner be
waived for the reason aforesaid. Carried.

Prior to passage of the foregoing resolution, Mrs. Scott inquired
if it would be possible for her to purchase the portion of road to be
closed, and the City Clerk advised that the Council always invites bids

or proposais when such parcels are offered for sale. Mr. A. Coult,

owner of the adjacent property, was in attendance and stated he had

applied to purchase the section of McKenzie Avenue to be closed a long
time before the Scotts had indicated any interest in it.
BY-LAWS:

Zon. Amend.B/law Moved by Alderman Mabbett:

#1308-fin.pass.
& adeption Seconded by Alderman Keryluk:

That By~law No. 1308 be reconsidered, finally passed and adopted.
Carried.

Prior to passage of the above-stated resolution, Alderman Traboulay
stated he had previously voted against initial consideration of the By-
law; however, in view of the fact that a single-family dwelling will be
created on the property, he would vote in favour of it and Alderman
Laking, who had similarly been opposed, stated he also intended to vote
in favour of the resolution for the reason given by Alderman Traboulay.

Soil Rem.Reg.& Moved by Alderman Laking:

Permit Amend.B/law
#1340-fin.pass. Seconded by Alderman Ranger:

& adoption

That By-law No. 1340 be reconsidered, finally passed and adopted.

Carried.
Moved by Alderman Ranger:

pass.& adoption Seconded by Alderman Traboulay:

That By~law No. 1341 be reconsidered, finally passed and adopted.
Carried.
Alderman Laking voted against the resolution.
Prior to passage of the above-stated resolution, Alderman Traboulay
inquired concerning the pending applications of Mr. Karass Steak House

and the Commercial Hotel, and the City Clerk advised that the By-law now

under consideration has no effect on either of those applications.