/l4, May 27th, 1974

City Eng.-re From ‘the | Cit y Engineer, May 22nd, +1974 advising that Let Baa. of. a: “Proposed,
frtg.exempt.~

proposed Sub~. Suhlivision of mretoas of District Lots 379, 463. and 466 does not “comply vith: the
‘div.Ptns.DLs.
.379,463 & 464 frontage requirement of Section. 71.2(1) of ‘the. Municipal Act, and | Fequesting

that consideration be given to ‘granting an evemption therefrom as provided in

Section 12(2) of the Municipal Act.

Moved by Alderman Ranger:

;

Seconded by Alderman » Mabbett i

That the Subdivision Plan of Portions of istrict Lots ays 9, 463, “and

464, Group One, Hew Westminster, prepared by Ch, ‘Und derhill, BoCsla8.y and ©

sworn correct _by him | on Hay ‘16th, 1974 » wherein Lot 34h is created with a ‘ron |
“tage upon the hgehway of less than 1/100 of its perineter, be approves;

. AND THAT the Plan of Subdivision aforesaid be exempted | from the aininon ;

frontage prescribed uider Section 720) of the | ‘Municipal Act and the "city.

of Port Coquitlam Subdivision of Land ay-lew, 1970, No. 992", Carried.

BY-LAWS: . .

; Traffic Reg.Am= Moved by Alderman Ranger:

‘end.B/law #1319

fin.pass.& | Seconded by _Aldernan Thompson:
adoption ©

‘That By-law No. 1319 be reconsidered, finally passed and adopted. Carried.
‘Aldernen Keryluk and Traboulay voted against: the resolution.

Prior to. passage of the resolution quoted above Alderman Teaboulay in--
quired: concerning the City! s costs on Laurier: Avenue in road repairs and the:
City Engineer agreed to provide what information he could in this regard, vand:
Aldernan Thompson suggested it. may: also be useful to receive information _con-. |
cerning other streets” in the City. for. comparative: purposes.
NEW BUSINESS: |
Ald.abbett re Alderman Mabbett ref ferced _to the traffic Light at Shaughnessy street

“traffic light-

Shaughnessy & and Pitt River Road, stating that in nis opinion it favours Pitt River. Road
Pitt. R.Rd..

“to mech and does not give the Shaughnessy. Street” traffic enough: time, and.

_ he asked the City. Engineer to review the situation.
Alderman ; ve : Po

-Traboulay re °° Alderman Traboulay stated he noticed the dykes were being sandbagged
sandbagging of
dykes at Colony Farm and that he felt similar action showid be taken for the dykes

protecting. the City,

Moved by Alderman Traboulay:

Seconded by Alderman Laking:

That the Inspector of Dykes be asked regarding the necessity for sand-
baggiag City dykes as is. presently being done. at the Colony. Farm dyke cavtica

‘Prior to passage of the res solution. stated: above, Aldetiian Nabbett noted -
“that t the Provincial Government and Snot, the Coquitlam byking District | was pay~

ing for the Colony Farm dyke reinforcenent.