¢ owt Department Rummage Editor, Pacific Tribune: The recent rummage sale held by the Fairview and Mount Pleasant clubs, was a big suc- cess, realizing $53.73. We had Wonderful cooperation from all © members and also received Contributions from out of town People. The committee wishes to thank all those who helped and Contributeq goods to the rum- Mage sale. Unsold goods were donated to the Unitarian Church which collects clothing for the Spanish refugees, I would advise other clubs to get together and hold a Tummage sale, as it is a splen- did way to raise funds for the Present Pacific Tribune press drive. Let us fulfill our quotas 8S soon as possible and put the drive over the top. It would be interesting to hear from other clubs on ways and means of raising funds. OLGA GRINKUS. _ Vancouver, B.C. Ireland Editor, Pacific Tribune: “In the column ‘Short Jabs’ written by Ol’ Bill in the March 21 issue of the Tribune, Ol Bill Says in part, “Ireland was the. only European country, besides Rea eny. and Italy, to send a of Franco against the Spanish 8overnment,” I cannot let Ol’ Bill get by. with a statement Which is only half the ‘truth, because what he does not tell in connection with Franco’s Trish Brigade is of considerable Politica] importance in under- Standing Irish Catholics and their struggle against the hier- archy. Briefly General Eoin O'Duffy, pectime Irish Chief of Police, °Sether with Archbishop Fog- arty, organized a battalion of _ Some 1,200 youhg Irishmen to. Support “Franco’s great Christ- jan Crusade,” to “replant the 8s of Christ in Spanish soil,” these boys mainly recruited from amongst the backward Peasantry and the remote moun- tain regions of the country were filled with lurid tales of the horrors perpetrated by the Bol- Shevik hordes,’ : - A so-called ‘Irish Christian ont? was set up to keep this brigade in supplies. The brigade Srrived in Spain at the time co’s Moors were leading the assault against Guernica. They Were sent directly to the front lines. When they got to the front lines they found that the Moor- ish troops fitted precisely the escription they had been given by their church leaders of the Bolshevik hordes,’ : A pitched battle took place tween the Moors and the Irish rigade. There were heavy cas- Valties on both sides before the fray was stopped. Priests then Undertook to explain to the ‘ig- _Rorant Irish’ that the ‘great Christian crusade’ was lead by 8nti-Christian Moors ang that these Moors in the service of Franco's Christ had a right to Slay Basque Catholics. And that ‘fie murder of helpless nuns and Priests, the raping of women ®nd butchering of children when Performed by Moors in the ser- Vice of Franco was a God given Privilege. Be it said to the eter- Nal credit of Ireland’s great tradition of 800 years of strug- 8le against oppression and tyr- anny that those young men re- Jected their priests and Franco 4nd his filthy fascist cause, rec- Bnizing it for what it was. They demandeq immediate re- Patriation to Ireland. They re- : FRIDAY, MARCH 28, 1947 Tigade to support the rebellion ~ fused to give up their arms. They were returned to Ireland. If my memory serves me right they were interned. behind barbed wire enclosures in an attempt to keep them from spreading news of what they had learned. The interment did not last long, however, in @ very short time an overwhelm- ing majority of the boys had broken loose and had spread their news all over the country. The Irish Christian Front col- lapsed. Its leaders had to go into hiding together with O’- Duffy and Archbishop Fogarty. _ Several hundred of the boys who had been in O’Duffy’s bri- gade joined Frank . Ryan and the Irish contingent of the British Section of the Interna; tional Brigade, went back to Spain and fought heroically in defense of Spanish democracy, against the fascist assault. No Marxist should be guilty ‘of lumping the Irish people and the Catholic Hierarchy into the one heap. Nor can Ireland be classed with Germany, Italy and Portugal. McNally and his ec- . Clesiastical friends do not and cannot speak for the Irish peo- ple any more than Donald Gor- don speaks for the Canadian people. GARRY CULHANE. Vancouver, B.C. . Social allowances Editor, Pacific Tribune: I wish to call your attention to the matter of social assist- ance allowances; while there has been a campaign for increased old age pensions, you never mention anything about in- creased social allowances, nor does the daily press. There are many aged and sick persons drawing some sort of social assistance, but no one seems to care what becomes of them. Some say, let them organ- ize and help themselves, but without help in this, such ad- vice is useless. Some time ago the city coun- cil agreed to raise the’ allow- ance to such people by $2.50 per month, but two cheques have been issued since then — without the above increase be- ing included. The daily press mentioned that the family unit (husband and wife) allowance was to be increased from $40 to $42.50 per month. I wish to state that the family unit al- lowance is only $32.60, and not as the daily’ press had it. A. Cheverton wrote a letter to the Vancouver Sun on this matter, and perhaps gave them’ the wrong figures. Anyway I was glad he brought the matter to the attention of the public, and I trust the Pacific Tribune will raise its voice on this matter also. ; _ READER. Vancouver, B.C. | Deportee Editor’s Note: The following “is a condensation of a letter to Bert Padgham of Vancouver from Hans Kist, former Van- couverite, deported to Germany in 1932 because of his active work among Canada’s unem- ployed during the early 30's. We are sure it will be of inter- est to many of our readers who knew this German worker be- fore ‘Iron Heel’ Bennett deliv- ered him to the Hitler regime. Dear Bert: It has been a long time since I wrote the last letter to you. Now this terrible war is over I want to try to get in touch with you in Vancouver again. Did I tell you already that I ~ Wate what you Pleate. was in the concentration camp in 1933? Of course we still were organizing the workers. But it went only until June. Then they got us and put us where we belonged according to their policy. I have haq a time I can tell you. You know, Bert, we were locked up in ’32 in Halifax at the immigration sheds. That was easy compared to the life and conditions at the concentration camp. Our work was to cultivate the swamps all over Germany, That wasn’t the hardest time I had to go through but who knows how it would have been if they took hold of me a second time. Yes, after the first half year they were after me again.~ I got away from Hamburg and lived at my father’s place for the next months unknown to the police. Naturally, I couldn’t stay long there,so I took to my feet and my bike and travelled through Germany without let- ting the police know who and where I was. After two years time I came out in public again but friends of mine tolq me that the police were informed of who I was so I escaped ‘into Belgium and Holland for some time. I had after to appear be- fore the Gestapo a few times and then it died down because the war broke out. I was con- scripted to the navy. Then I was released until 1944. In Jan- “uary of the same year they hauled me up again. In May, 1945, I was a prisoner of war. The Tommies got us at Wil- helmshaven and in September they sent me home. I had not seen much of the war. You know I belonged to a _ labor unit not a fighting one. If it had been a fighting one I wouldn’t have been there very long; the Tommies or anybody else would have got me for a prisoner. I was prisoner interpreter for the English and after I went home this firm the AEG (Gen- eral Electric Company) put me to work with the Yankees at the replacement camp. ‘You cannot imagine what conditions are like here. Every goddam city or fairly big town is smashed’and blown to pieces. Wesermunde-Bremerhaven suf- fers from the same _ disease. Particularly Bremerhaven does- n’t exist any more if it wouldn’t be for the other two cities connected with it. You see, Wes- ermunde consists of what were formerly three town, . Geste- munde, Bremerhaven and Lehe, which were amalgamated in 1934. Now we are short of everything. Every week you can receive four pounds of potatoes and the Germans like potatoes very much. It is far too little. Fats, it makes no difference, butter, margarine or lard, you don’t get more than a quarter of a pound every four weeks. Terrible, isn’t it, and all the other stuffs is approximately the same. Of bread we are get- ting now so much that you get along just so. Reading mater- jals are pretty poor and we have nothing to educate our- selves with. Party literature is poor; you can buy some pam- phlets but it isnot like it was before 1933. Half of the popu- lation is fed by the U.S. army civilian kitchen, but only one meal a day. It wasn’t splendid when I was in Vancouver, but better than in Germany today, and I often think of you and wish I was back again. Right now we are fighting capitalism again just the same as we did before the war.” Sig ot Yours, HANS. Short Jabs by ol’ ut IKE QUILL is one of the best-known union men in New York. He is the leader of the Transport Workers’ Union. He is not a’ communist, but he is a good union man just the same. He has, like every other good unionist, been called a ‘Red’ by the enemies of labor. His reply to that accusation is a very simple one. He says he would rather be called a Good and bad ‘Red’ by the rats than be called a rat by the ‘Rede’. “Pat” Sullivan, on the other hand, is different. Like Budenz, one-time editor of the Daily Worker, he doesn’t mind being a rat and seeking refuge under the skirts of a red-baiting priest. It is hard on the rat of course, but when workers use that term they don’t do so with any intention of insulting the rat. In a book just published by Budenz, “This Is My Story,” he confesses that his resignation from the Communist Party of the U.S. was held up for months while “he fingered his rosary’ and awaited the permission of Monseigneur Fulton Sheean to make it public. It had to be timely and fit into the program of the red- baiters. It is apparent on the face of it, that the Sullivan incident is part of a plan—to wreck thé Canadian Seamen’s Union and with it the whole trade union movement in Canada, and further, as a follow-up to the so-clled spy scare as a means to destroy the LPP and dissipate its influence among the Canadian workers. That it was planned may be seen from. two local news items. First, a’ week before Sullivar. published his shameful confession, members of the CSU were told by shipowner agents on the water- front here that “by the end of the month, their union would be all washed up.” Second, “Western Business and Industry” for March, printed probably sometime in February, refers in its editorial to the Sullivan sell out in these words: “Currently, Canadian news- papers are making a big story of the resignation of ‘‘Pat” Sulli- van of the Canadian Seamen’s Union. This, of course, is followed by a venomous attack on the communists. Everything was set for the “great. exposure.” When Sullivan advises “all members of the CSU to quit the | union” is he any way different to the shipowners who advised them to do the same thing during their heroic struggle on the Great Lakes for the eight-hour day a year ago, and at other times too? Sullivan’s unwarranted advice, like that of all enemies of labor, is_meant to create dissention, to confuse the workers and render their unions useless as a wet rag so that they may be exploited more thoroughly to the glory of their capitalist masters. ELLING-OUT” is not a new phenomenon in the labor movement. It has happened many times. In this case, on the evidence, it is an open-and-shut’ case. _Harry Davis, acting-president of the union, states that T. C. McManus, the union secretary, was offered a bribe of $100,000 to sell the seamen during the discussions on the Lakes strike, in the presence of Justice Not all Judases! S. E. Richards. Aage Antonen, Lakes =i vice-president, was also present and en- dorses McManus’ claim. Richards, in answering} Harry Davis’ statement in a press release says the story is “definitely wrong. I know how the rumor started but am not in a position to explain the details.” That is the kind of evasion to be expected from a lawyer. He is not in a “position to explain the details” because there is nothing to explain. The word of two honest seamen is worth more than the “explanations” of one capitalist judge any- time. McManus refused $100,000. We wonder, how much did Sullivan get? ‘ The pattern of action of these traitors is very similar. -Essel- _ wein-Leopold, when thrown cut of the Communist Party, disap- peared, to become visible again only when he had to do the real dirty work. Budenz disappeared into a Catholic seminary. Gou- zenko has gone into hiding beyond human ken. Sullivan does the disappearing act, too. On report says he has retired to a monas- tery. He fears an “unavoidable accident.” : Just why should Sullivan fear an “unavoidable accident”? Surely not from the communists. Nothing happened to Esselwein-Leopold in the twenty years or so since he was ditched by the communists except that he has been made an inspector in the RCMP. — If Sullivan can keep sober long enough, he may accident- ‘ally be made into a priest of one kind or another just as Budenz was made into a professor in a Catholic college. Of course there is always the chance that some of the Ca- _ tholic seamen whom he has sold out, may take a poke at him—for good cause. \ All of these birds became patriotic but it is the patriotism Dr. Johnson speaks of, “the last refuge of a scoundrel.” Gouzenko says, “I was surprizeq curing the first days by the complete free- dom of the individual which exists in Canada. ... What the Canadian people have accomplished and are accomplishing here under complete independence.” (Certainly not the ‘complete free- dom’ of the seamen in the Lakes strike.) ‘ Sullivan writes: “As I watched the various new Canadians receiving their citizenship papers, it made me realize what a won- derful country we had here in Canada. ... I think I- have be- come a Canadian citizen.’ Sullivan was a better Canadian citizen before he sold himself, when he was fighting the battles of the exploited, robbed and slave-driven seamen, than he is now. (By the way, these two passages are written by the same “ghost” and it is neither Gouzenko nor Sullivan.) Esselwein-Leopold too, besides being a stool pigeon, is a pa- triot. Ask Col. Hill. And Budenz is a patriot too. He has written his book to prove it. The red baiters and communist haters all} rushed to buy it (or at least to read it.) They expected to hear exposures of “innocent fronts} and to learn names, faces and accounts of activities of Moscow agents; of ‘nefarious plots” and so on. Max Lerner, in PM says if you read — a the book from that angle “you will be disappointed.” 3 “You can read the book for its inner-party gossip. That was the. part of its interest for me but it was terribly meager pick-— ings.” About Moscow big shots, “his evidence is ‘nebulous’,” in fact, Lerner doubts their existence. John Chamberlain, in the N.Y. Times, writes that the antici- pations which have been aroused, however, will not be satisfied.” There is nothing in the book about mysterious Moscow agents. His _ meeting with men from Moscow are fleeting and tantalizing. But it is part of the campaign against the workers. : : PACIFIC TRIBUNE—PAGE 5 “