Pension scandal @ Behind the tragic story of Henry Page lie the many ~smouldering grievances of thousands of veterans against the Canadian Pensions Commission. —OTTAWA. aged 59, veteran of the First World War, calmly entered the office of Dr. Mur- S HORTLY before 10 o’clock on the morning of Tuesday, November 25, Henry Page, ray R. Bowie, medical examiner for the department of veteran affairs. “Are you Dr. Bowie?” he asked. “Yes,” replied Dr. Bowie. Page then brought a .38 revolver to within a foot of the doctor’s chest, pumped four shots into the medical man across his desk, then turned the weapon on himself. The tragic killing and suicide has centered public attention on the body of laws affecting re- turned” veterans of two © world wars, which have long been the subject of agitation by Cana- dian Legion bodies, members of parliament, and pensioners themselves. For the greater tragedy is that the killing could have been averted had action been taken to remedy the grievous short- comings in legislation covering _ disability-pensions for war vet- erans. Immediate cause of the tragic event was the reduction of a 60 percent disability-pension awarded the former member of the “Princess Pats.” Dr. Bowie had reexamined Page on Octo- ber 31 and found, according to his examination, that Page was no longer suffering an extreme arthritic condition for which he was receiving a 40 percent pen- sion, - _ The Canadian Pensions Com- mission recommended cutting this to 20 percent. Page still was to receive a 10 percent pension for gun-shot wounds in the chest and an additional 10 per- cent for shoulder injuries. His total pension was thus cut from 60 to 40 percent. In round figures based on Schedule A, the ‘scale-of pen- sions shown in the Pension Act, Page’s pension had been cut from $720 a year or $60 a month to $480 a year or $40 a month. Had the same cut in _ per- centage disability been ordered | for a former lieutenant-colonel it would have meant a drop from $1,116 a year to $744 a year; and for a one-time briga- dier-general from $1,800 to §$1,- 200. Page received an additional income as a toy repairman in a departmental store. WARD of disability-pensions appears unrelated in the schedules given to the current occupation of the veteran. His former rank in the service freezes him at a rate of pen- sion regardless of the fact that another veteran with a higher rank suffers exactly the same wound or condition. Again it Should be pointed out that most- higher rank officers. of both the First and Second World Wars have independent sources of income. Publishers withdraw ‘spy expose’ COLLINS SONS & COMPANY (CANADA) LTD. publishers and distributors of Soviet Spies—The Story of Russian Faced with threat of legal action, the publishers agreed _ to recall all copies of the book already distributed and to refrain from publishing or distributing any further copies or editions of the book. —MONTREAL. FRIDAY, DECEMBER 12, 1947 . ' tion The granting of unequal rates for similar disabilities solely on the grounds of rank held while in service works a fundamental injustice in applying the regula- tions and is bound to create ill-will and division among vet- erans. : Adding fuel to the discontent among pensioners is the nig- gardly “letter of the law” ap- plication of rulings, without re- gard for factors entering a par- ticular situation not covered by the Pension Act. Social service officers with DVA can undoubt- edly provide many instances calling for adjustment that are not covered by the Act and the source of real hardship for vet- erans, incapacitated by the war. HIAT there is room for sharp reform in the administra- tion of veteran pensions, partic- ularly as it applies to the diag- nosis of ills and the award of percentage disabilities to the veteran, is borne out in a series of sensational charges made on November 10 by Dr. W. G. Blair, M.P., before members of two Ottawa Progrssive-Conser- vative women’s clubs. Page, the First World War veteran, was suffering from a condition known as_ arthritis. According to Dr. Blair, there are approximately 600,000 suf- ferers from the disease, out of which some 125,000 are crip- pled. ‘It is a disease of long dur- ation and accounts for more lost time at work and produc- than any other chronic disease - It is a disease which has been misunderstood and neglected. Since there is no specific cure in the past it has been viewed with a spirit of hopelessness.” This is what Dr. ing, Blair says and DVA arthritic specialists will undoubtedly agree with him. < Later in his talk he makes the specific charge: “I consid- er the effort of the department of national health and welfare in dealing with the scourge as puny, ineffectual and misdirect- ed.” Blair bases this wholesale at- tack on the government’s lack of responsibility in the matter and on the manner in which diagnosis and treatment of the disease js being handled by the department of veterans affairs. ‘I question thd ability of DVA to handle this situation. They have not the staffs on their hospitals of sufficient physicians and personnel, trained in arthritis to carry out such a program effectively. There is a marked shortage of physicians trained in arthritis clinics,” says Dr. Blair. =— By MARK FRANK- N the light of these blunt charges from a member of the medical profession, would it not be wise to conduct a thor- ough-going review of arthritic cases still on the files of the Canadian Pensions Commission? Again, in the interest of citi- zens in general, would it not be indicated that, along with other shortcomings in the na- tion’s attack on disease, arthri- tis be subjected to intense study and research by the best medi- cal brains in Canada? Streamlining of pension- disability regulations, having re- gard for social and economic aspects of each veteran’s case, and departure from the cold- blooded mechanical application of existing regulations appear tio be delfinitely indicated if many tragedies of which the killing here was only an ex- treme. example, are to be pre- vented, Britain fears unemployment By WILLIAM TAIT ‘—LONDON. HE fear of unemployment is haunting Britain today de- spite the current labor shortage. The center of Britain’s auto in- dustry, Coventry, has already been reduced to part-time pro- duction, unemployment and part- .time work have started in the clothing industry in London and Leeds and not long ago the shipbuilding workers on _ the Clyde told me that unemploy- ment was as bad as before the war. ess I saw what unemployment méant to Scotland before the war and it meant the same thing in every other industrial area. In the heavy industries the depression did not end in 1933. In 1935, for example, one- third of all Scottish workers were jobless. : I remember the huge idle cranes looming over the Glas- gow streets and the children playing in their shadow—chil- dren whose diet was tea, bread and margarine, and whose teeth, at the age of 12, were worn down to the gums. The pay for a heavy laborer was 38 shillings $7.60) a week if he was lucky enough to find work. I know’ one man who was unemployed for seven solid years and a dozen who were without work for five years. It was not until the war came that there was work for almost everyone, While others complained of wartime ration- the Scottish workers ate better than they had for 20 years simply because they were earning regular wages. During the war, infant mortality in Scotland fell from 77 to 55 per thousand. : In time of labor shortage; why do many people fear that these times will return? There are ominous signs, they tell you. CLYDE shipyards boast that they make the finest ships in the world and the big liners earn England precious dollars. But the Harriman com- mitte has advised President Truman that Britain should not make big liners, that the U.S. is to build them. The Clyde workers may not be experts on international af- fairs but they’re asking today: Does that mean we'll be out of jobs? Gavin Martin, general secre- tary of the Confederation of Shipbuilding and Engineering Unions, put it bluntly: “Britain has been trying to sell abroad — the luxury products of light engineering instead of the en- gineering capital goods which other countries wanted.” The workers have read the statement of W. T. Munro, chairman of the British Export Woollen Mission, who said re- cently on his return from the US.: ne : doubt that many firms who now want to export to the U.S. for the first time appear to have the idea that American buyers are , wait- ing “with open arms to place orders. for all kinds of mater- ials; nothing could be further from the truth . In rmvst types of woollen goods one may almost say. that a buyers’ mar- © ket exists.” ; “There is no In a number of places, the question is being asked: “How can Britain’s out-of-date indus- © tries compete with U.S. indus- try in a buyers’ market?” 1 . Interested in jobs rather than political maneuvering, many workers and their representa- tives in parliament are asking why Britain cannot supply heavy machinery to eastern Eur- ope in exchange for needed food. The question has now come even from Minister of Food John Strachey. PACIFIC TRIBUNE—PAGE 11