onntiorsn All arclibighameeenaity apeiron Vietnam war a major cause WHAT’S BEHIND THE GOLD CRISIS? By EMIL BJARNASON Another monetary crisis has come and gone. On Sunday March 17th, the international monetary authorities found the solution to the gravest of such crises Since 1929 by laying the foundations for the next. Tens of thousands of speculators, lured by the unique profits that only a rise in the price of gold can bring, sank their savings in gold bullion or gold stocks in the past few weeks and woke up this Monday morning to find the prospect an illusion. Yet those speculators, however wrong they may have been as to timing and detail, had based their actions on a perfectly sound appraisal of the underlying situation. They knew that the Johnson government had committed itself to a disastrous. course leading to collapse of the dollar, from which there could be no escape within the rules of the game. Where they made their error was in underestimating the capacity of the U.S. and its allies to change the rules. és Why was the dollar in trouble? A simple analogy will perhaps help to explain. Before the introduction of present day banking laws, the monetary system of the capitalist countries Operated on the basis of two institutions: the gold standard and the banking system. Under the gold standard, all values were supposedly measured in terms of gold. When the supply of goods increased faster than the supply of gold, the shortage of gold-backed money caused prices to fall. This discouraged production of goods and stimulated the production of gold, thus tending to reverse the situation. Similarly, when the gold supply increased faster than the production of goods, prices rose, and set the opposite process in motion. Thus the gold standard supposedly automatically regulated the price system and kept it stable. But along side this was the banking system. People deposited their money in banks, which loaned it out at interest. But because it was inconvenient and even dangerous to ‘carry the gold about, borrowers were just as happy to accept notes promising to pay in gold. And since the bankers were rarely required to deliver the actual gold, they availed themselves of the opportunity to lend, in the form of notes, ten or twenty or forty times as much gold as they actually had in their vaults — and, of course, collect interest on it. SYSTEM SHAKEY This system worked fine, from the bankers point of view, but it had two unfortunate consequences. First, on the few occasions when the public came to realize that they were holding notes equal to many times the amount of gold the bankers had available to redeem them, all depositors would attempt to draw See GOLD CRISIS, pg. 3 Te) Financial Post Story Reveals FRIDAY, MARCH 22, 1968 VAST GIVEAWAY PLANNED Resources sellout linked to Bill 33 By MAURICE RUSH The Financial Post headline from the March 9 issue reproduced on this page tells a big part of the story why Premier W. A. C. Bennett wants to build and control the. superport at Roberts Bank, and why he wants to throttle labor with Bill 33. It also explains in part his anti-Canadian stand. Huge Japanese trusts are investing hundreds of millions of dollars in B.C. raw material industries with a view to extracting them for export to Japan. In Japan they are being processed into manufactured goods for resale to Canada and the rest of the world. Exports of raw materials from B.C. ports to Japan last year came to about $483 million- up 44 percent from 1966. If the outflow of raw materials to Japan continues at the. same rate in 1967 it could surpass present exports to the U.S. The Kaiser deal which will see coal - from the Crow’s Nest shipped to Japan in large quantities through Roberts Bank, has served to draw public attention to the rape of our resources being carried out by Japanese and U.S. corporations with the direct collusion of the B.C. and ‘Federal governments. The Financial Post estimates that we are only seeing the beginning of the vast Japanese —,and in some cases, Japanese and U.S.-takeover of B.C.’s mineral treasures. In 1967 B.C. mining rose to a production level of $392 million. Now. the Post says that this will rise to one billion dollars in the forseable future. ‘Japanese companies interested in {for lumber B.C.’s mineral resources include all the well-known mining and smelting monopolies which dominate Japan. -- Not only are these companies buying large mining properties outright, but in many cases are Superport too—Bonner Attorney General Bonner said the proposed Roberts Bank port js needed for export growth and not for coal alone. Bonner told the Insurance Agents’ Association of B.C. convention at Richmond that although Roberts Bank is talked about in terms of coal export to Japan, it is also necessary for saore exports of B.C. lumber The above story, which appeared in the Province this Wednesday, confirms the charge made in this article by the: PT’s associate editor, that the Socred, government wants to control Roberts, Bank so that it can be turned into a vast outlet for the export of raw matericls of all kinds on a scale never before seen in our history. The Financial Post Japanese invest more in B.C. than in U.S.? entering into deals under which loans are made which are repayable in raw materials. Two examples are the deals made by the Mitsubishi and . Sumitcomo interests which took over control of the production of Granisle Copper and Wesfrob Mines on the “Queen Charlottes by lending large sums of money in return for exclusive export contracts. Japanese mining and smelting — companies are interested in every type of mineral found in B.C. They see B.C. as a vast source of raw -materials needed by their processing - industries in Japan. While their main interest is in_ minerals, Japanese financial groups are also interested in B.C.’s forest resources. They are already involved in three large pulp projects, including the $43 million Crestbrook project at Prince George. Despite warnings from the late_ Chief Justice Sloan in his famous report on forestry, that severe restrictions should be put on the export of raw logs, there has been in recent months a big jump in log exports. In 1967 log exports reached the highest figure since 1941 — 190 million fbm. Nearly all of this has gone to Japan along with the thousands of man-days of work which their processing could have meant to jobless B.C. woodworkers. In the last two years Japan has come close to replacing Britain as B.C.’s second largest market for forest products — the main one being VOL. 29, NO. 12 the U.S. And the demand for raw forest products is expected to expand greatly in the next few years. It is reported that the Socred government is engaged in secret negotiations with Japanese business ‘men covering many future deals for B.C. raw materials. This is indicated by the heavy emphasis in Victoria on the coming B.C. government pavillion at Expo 70 in Osaka. The major reason why the Bennett government wants control over superport facilities at Roberts Bank is because it wants unquestioned control over the outlets for shipping vast quantities of raw materials from our forests, mines and other resources to Japan and the U.S. It also wants to ensure that facilities will be built to handle not only coal from the Crows Nest, but also logs, lumber, pulp, minerals, oil and other exportable raw materials. <= Tribune _10c It’s clear from the Financial Post story, and from the many moves made by Premier Bennett recently, that B.C. is entering a new stage in the process of giving away our raw materials in return for quick profits for promoters. In this new stage the emphasis will be on the giveaway of mineral resources — primarily to Japan. We are about to witness the biggest sellout of the province’s mineral resources in our history. The job of alienating our forest resources to foreign monopolies, mainly U.S., has been largely completed and most of our best forest lands are already in the hands of these monopolies. Now mining is next. The explanation for Premier Bennett’s anti-Canadian stand — See RESOURCES, pg. 11 Bill 33 can be defeated See Communist Party statement on page 12