a . 5 | * . - | Waste: it’s now or later | It doesn’t take extraordinary intuition or exceptional skills to forecast that Terrace and the surrounding area will eventually run into a trash disposal problem. The only question is when it will happen. oo There is no question, however, that it will be easier and less expensive to deal with if there is some ad- vance planning done about solid waste disposal. The | current municipal and regional district landfills can continue accepting our debris for quite a while, and at first glance there is so much unoccupied and unused land in this vicinity that one could conclude the solu- tion is to simply keep moving the dump site around. A detailed examination indicates otherwise. Land- fills can only be located in areas that fulfill certain . very specific criteria, and in an area with heavy annual precipitation, a lot of surface water running around and widely varying soil permeability, site selection is a major headache. The B.C, Ministry of Environment, led by Prince George South MLA Bruce Strachan, has taken some commendable and progressive steps to deal with a variety of impending trash problems in the province. First came the Special Waste Advisory Committee with a comprehensive plan to deal with the disposal and generation of hazardous garbage (a convincing . concept that has yet to be tested in the real world), and now a discussion paper has been released and a task force struck to confront the more familiar prob- lem of the hundreds of kilograms of debris each of us leave in our wake annually as we consume our way through the good life. Hearings will take place throughout B.C. in the coming months, and if the provincial government is offering some sort of a cost-sharing proposition on solid waste disposal through a provincial network | similar to the one being established for hazardous _ waste, then now is the time for the City of Terrace and the Kitimat-Stikine Regional District to start thinking about buying in. -- Old and forgotten? ‘While paving a certain amount of our paradise is necessary and commendable, does the modernization of our city have to include turning our backs on the past? Let’s keep one reminder of our roots, the former police building, clo city center. VERIFIED CIRCULATION PAID | Terrace Review Gg se to our hearts and to. our Established May 1, 1985 The Terrace Review Is published each Wednesday by _ . Close-Up Business Services Ltd. Publisher: | Mark Twyford ~- . 0 Editon . Michael Kelly es 3 Staff Reporters: - booed Tod Strachan co, Gharlynn Toews ~- Advertising Sales: _ Mar) Twyford “. Typesetting: * Linda Copeland ve... Productlon: . > Jim Hall, Alvin Stewart, — jurbax Gill, Linda Mercer ‘4 Office: “> Garrle Olson “Accounting: '; Mar] Twyford — ‘Second-class mail 5 registration No, 6896. - ing space otcu ed for, but the balance of the advar-~ * queerepememscsneamenememmessoneaineae"* All material appearing In the Terrace Review Is protected: under Canadian copyright Registra- tlon No. 362776 and cannot legally be rapro- _duced for any raazon without parmiasion of the publisher. . . . : Errors and omissions. Advertising is accepted an the condition that. in the event of typographical error, that portiort of the advartls- lod by the erroneous Item will notbecha ) jisement wilt be pald for at the applicable rate. ’ Advertisers must assume responslbility for or- ‘pore iv any classified ad whieh le supplied to the + Terrace Review In handwrlttan form. In-compliance with the 6.6, Humen Rights Act, discriminates against a person due to age, race, roligion, color, sax, nationality, anosalry orplace te oforigi, oe . _ 4535 Greig Avenue, = Terrace, B.C... V8G 1M7 | ‘> Phone: 635-7840. 4 1” - the meeting. 4 " Po - One year eubscriptions: In Canada $24.00 oA Out of Canada $60.00 Seniors In Terrace and Diptrlot $12.00 : Senlora out of Terrace and District $15.00- Letters to the editor will be considered for publication only when signed. | Please include your telephone number. The expre editor reserves the right to condense and edit letters. Opinions ssed afé not necessarily those of the Terrace Review. ; ' tee, we will go back to the... .-- -table-and do our utmost to get “A stronger motivation _ ‘wondering whether this month will be their last one on the job. Shields says he and chief government negotiator Bob Plecas get along well so it is not a personality problem. “The problem is that he is the agent of the government’s privatization plans. That’s. his. Tole there.”” my When it comes to solving this , deadlock, Shields is not looking by Victoria correspondent — Mark Collins One of the most frustrating aspects of life in B.C. in the 80’s is having the British Col- umbia Government Employees Union conduct a strike vote when so few, if any, of the — members want to strike. — About 800 members gathered in Victoria to hear union presi- _dent John Shields speak about . the state of their contract talks with the provincial government. It was a sad speech, an admis- sion that the negotiations had .. broken off and failed to reach ‘a new contract. They need. to take a strike vote, Shields says, to get the government’s atten- tion.. He compared it to hitting © .an unresponsive mulé between -the eyes witha 2x4, - -- go advertisement wilt be published which 47 don't believe in going on strike either. If-they.doem-.. - power the bargaining commit- .& negotiated collective agree- ‘ment,’ Shields said following If these talks were just ‘about rates of pay they would have reached'a settlement weeks ago" ‘but the privatization issue makes it much more com- plicated. Improving job sécuri- ty has always-been an impor- tant trade union objective but Premier Vander Zalm’s govern- . ment has decided that public "servants should alwaysbe = to a traditional ally like the B.C. Federation of Labor. He’s counting on the management side of B.C. industry. “*T don’t think with the ~ private sector having suc- cessfully negotiated a series.of agreements, that the leaders of industry will stand by and let Mr. Vander Zalm drag the pro- vince into’ an industrial . . dispute,”? Shields said. ‘‘I just don’t believe that the economy, private or public, wants to see a dispute at this point. Nor do I believe that the private sector who have been able to success- fully negotiate contracting out language will be very tolerant ‘of the government bringing them into a strike over its in- tention to contract out all the Cost overrun: job cost $77,586 bringing the = “The cost of last year’s airport terminal upgrade exceeded the contracted amount by nearly eight percent according to.infor- mation given to the Kitimat- Terrace :and District Labour Council by Minister of State for. Transport, Gerry St. Germain. And this, says Labour Council business manager Paul John- ston, is just one more example of the fact that the lowest bid isn’t always the cheapest. According to Johnston, a non-union company, . Tendev Construction of Surrey, won the contract with a low bid of. $981,053, But: “‘extras’’ on the: been signed, government jobs.” ans People leaving the meeting - were very worried about being — victims or used as pawns... There was a feeling of helpless- ness in the face of a process ~ they know is wrong but are. unable to stop. That is the kind of feeling that prompts people . to form a union. It is a much stronger motivation than fighting for an extra 25 cents ._ perhour, =. - ~ One long-time government employee said he had dedicated oo his life to the greatest public “good and achieving what’s best -. for the people-of B.C. He said he and his co-workers believe — in what they are doing. He described these contract talks as a major turning point and. said the provincial government should-reveal more of its plans so they could be carefully con- sidered by the public. BCGEU members have not _ been very popular during pre- © vious strikes but it could be different this time if wide-- spread opposition to policies of the Vander Zalm government re translates into support for gov- ernment workers. ; ne total cost for the federal govern- ment up to $1,058,639. The se- cond lowest bid: however, was” submitted by Terrace H & H Construction’ and. was only $1,025,000, says Johnston. Department of ‘Transport’ : - public affairs officer ° Judith. - Smith says the cost overrun -. oe would have occurred regardless | - of who won the contract, She exe" = plains that the cost for extras ~ was due to ‘site conditions” and changes wére made by ‘the architect after the contract: liad