i ™. 3. COLDWELL } a i ws THERESE CASGRAIN HAROLD WINCH | Is the CCF moving Right? Me Wi iit hae {ly-hel NYS moved d opinion that to the right. X i pire, Matters should be eas. a little more closely, eilion he action of the con- Date . “certainly be de- The Cp etessive circles. Beeeq vith Convention was fis Problems ae a is Ich Co 5 Bug, Not Strangers ak an he ee question: what cay 5° & to combat the po- ey, “Slons sown among €fs an, farmers by td {ct economic boom Hon? p MUlate political ac- oth vier CCE and the LPP eas - Mistaken in past pirix Be Eee rcsied the e€ boo Brissy, PProach of Efanis ‘The ¢ . 3 them by Hes dealt with this h Opti ¥ | The Peclaration @ Ses P'Ssions a in its current dis- Pl tonya vt 0 its 6th natio- Ny Sling yon next year, is € same prob- Put. yy « 4 tam aS in its 1952-54 tiggtion of the Ca- prom Colonial- e leadership, it con 8 Proposed and oon vention supnost Cy of por “stead of boldly ole road and 4's that. are bas- fee Working class é perspec- ae Victories, In so : a V2 Jong-term tactics, immediate Pop * 0 &xq Out th Mple, Much j my" ne ee mae an “Ntion’, was: the r “con: ee oPerat; oheke that in te Woul Ommonwealth hile °*Pitay on pce: the 4. 22d profit, s big Monopolies would come under public con- trol. But this is not a matter of socialist principle. In the pre- liminary stages of the build- ing of socialism, such a mlx- ture is inevitble. In 1921 the Russian Com- munists adopted a New Econ- omic Policy which permitted private capitalist production and distribution under strict state control. Today in people’s China, state capitalism exists, under the control of a socialist state, and the national capitalists cooperate with the govern- ment. To one degree or another, in all of the people’s democra- cies, elements of a “mixed economy” are to be found. But, in every case, the “com- manding heights” of the econ- omy are in the hands of a workers’ state, and the goal of planning is socialism. As Fred Tipping of Winni- peg told the CCF convention, it would be far better to speak of the problem. of “transition” to socialism than to give the impression that private capl- talism would always continue to exist under socialism. Another example can be cited. It has been an axiom of Marxism from the time of Marx and Engels that private property and production in agriculture — petty capitalist production — would not and could not be socialized by ar- bitrary socialist state action. Socialism can come to agri- - culture through cooperation in production, only by force of example, as. Engels said, and not through coercion. The CCF convention assured Canadian farmers that it is In favor of retaining the “family farm.” The Communists al- ways have insisted on this— with the distinction that they have also said that the farmers under socialism would learn through experiences of the advantages of cooperative farming. The LPP program 1s quite specific on this point. It is a guiding policy of the countries led by the Commu- nist parties. But the CCF con- vention held out no socialist future for agriculture. _ Can it reasonably be elaim- ed that socialism is confined to industry and cannot 1in- clude farming at some stage of development? * There is nothing wrong, and in fact it is essential that so- cialists should constantly re- view the economic and politi- cal situation in the country, and its relations with the world picture, in order to find the tactics and issues which will increase the ‘political maturity” of the labor move- ment of which the CCF con- vention spoke. But that does not mean spreading illusions about capitalism, as Richard Cross- - man of the British Labor party tried to do at the CCF con- vention. In ~essence, Crossman re- peated the claim of capitalist economists in the U.S. that a “new capitalism” has arrived which is free from the evils of the “old capitalism”. This is taken a step farther by cer- tain social democrats who claim that out of the “new capitalism” we can “creep” in- to socialism. As David Lewis pointed out in his pamphlet, A Socialist Takes Stock (reviewed recent- ly in the Pacific Tribune), capitalism breeds economic crisis and insecurity, and that even now, in the midst of the : post-war boom. insecurity and poor living standards are rife. It is one thing to recognize that im order to fight effective- ly the oldline parties and meet their propaganda in the new post-war conditions and a lengthy, though temporary boom, new tactics are in order. It is another thing to develop the illusion that the capifalist leopard has changed his spots and that consequently the need for socialism has vanished. * A great to-do was made in the commercial press about Saskatchewan. It was made to appear that the Douglas CCF government, after years of of- fice, is pressing for a repudi- ation of basic CCF policy in order to tempt U.S. investors. Now, the LPP, which sup- ported the re-election last June of the CCF government, has friendly criticism of some of Douglas’ policies and does not hesitate to-veice them: The (Concluded on page 12) Declaration of Principles afford. the hospital and medical care they need. Educational institutions have been starved for funds and, even in days of pros- perity, only a small pro- portion of young men and women who could benefit from technical and higher education can afford it. In short, Canada is still characterized by glaring in- equalities of wealth and op- portunity and by the domi- nation of one group over another. The growing. con- centration of corporate wealth has resulted in a virtual economic dictator- ship by a privileged few. This threatens our political democracy which will at- tain its full meaning only when our people have a voice in the management of their economic affairs and effective control over the means by which they live. The Folly of Wasted Resources Furthermore, even dur- ing a time of high employ- ment, Canada’s productive capacity is not fully utiliz- ed, Its use is governed by the dictates of private econ- omic power and by con- siderations of private profit. Similarly, the scramble for profit has wasted and despoiled our rich resources of soil, water, forest and minerals. This lack of social plan- ning results in a waste of our human as well as our natural resources. Our hu- man resources are wasted through social and econ- omic conditions which stunt human _— growth, through unemployment and through our failure to pro- vide adequate education. The Challenge of New Horizons The CCF believes that Canada needs a program for the wise development and conservation of its nat- ural resources. Our indus- try can and should be so operated as to enable our people to use fully their talents and skills. Such an economy will yield the maximum opportunities for individual development and the maximum of goods and services for the satisfaction of human. needs at home and. abroad. Unprecedented scientific and technological advances have brought us to the threshold of a second in- dustrial revolution. Op- portunities for enriching the standard of life in Ca- nada and elsewhere are greater than ever. How- ever, unless careful study is given to the many problems. which will arise and unless there is intelligent. plan- ning to meet them, the evils of the past will be multi- plied in the future. The technological changes will produce even greater con- “ centration of wealth and power and will cause wide- spread distress through un- employment and the dis- placement of populations. The challenge facing Ca- nadians today is whether future development will continue to perpetuate the inequalities of the past or whether it will be based on principles of social jus- tice. Capitalism Basically Immoral Economic expansion ac- companied by widespread suffering and injustice is not desirable social pro- gress. A society motivated by the drive for private gain and special privilege is basically immoral. The CCF. reaffirms its be- lief that our society must have a moral purpose and must build a new relation- ship among men — a yre- lationship based on mutual respect and on equality of opportunity. In such a so- ciety everyone will have a sense of worth and belong- ing, and will be enabled to develop’ his capacities to the full. Social Planning For a Just Society -Such a society cannot be built without the applica- tion of social planning. In- vestment of available funds must be channelled into socially desirable projects; financial and credit re- sources must be used to help maintain full employ- ment and to control infla- tion and deflation. In the cooperative com- monwealth there will be an - important role for public, private and cooperative en- terprise working together in the people’s interest. The CCF has always re- cognized public ownership as the most effective means of breaking the strangle- hold of private monopolies on the life of the nation and of facilitating social planning necessary for vance. The CCF will, there- fore, extend public owner- economic security and ad- ship wherever it is neces- sary for the achievement of these objectives. At the same time, the CCF also recognizes that in many fields there will be need for private enterprise which «can make a _ useful contribution to fhe develop- ment of our economy. The cooperative commonwealth will, therefore, provide ap- propriate opportunities for private business as well as publicly-owned. industry. The CCF protects and make more widespread the ownership of family farms by those who till them, of homes by those who live in ‘them, and of all person- al possessions necessary for the well-being of the Cana- dian people. In many fields the best (Continued on page 12) August 31, 1956 — PACIFIC TRIBUNE — PAGE 11 —caneet WEF Fe i —_ ’ it