the members comes home is the time his con- stituents can meet him. They forget when they get up there on the hill that it’s the folks at home that will in the final analysis decide wheth- er they can spend more years in the hallowed chamber of parliament. They'll find out that the folks back home want them to end the ‘quiet diplomacy’ kick and start telling the Yanks what Canadians really feel about the war in Vietnam. . They’ll find out that the folks back home want less celebrating of the centennial and more done to ensure the indpendence of their country from the United States. They’ll find out that people want the Carter Commission Report implemented, something done to stop rising prices; an end to the use of injunc- tions in labor disputes. And the more people go to see their MP while he is holidaying, the more guarantee we will have that when the session opens in September there will be action, not just talk. but somehow on this hot July day the only thing that comes to mind is the integration of the arm- ed forces and the great debate over the new uni- form. Of course, there were a number of special committees and royal commissions who made re- ports and a number more of these bodies which have been established. We certainly are going to be the best researched country in the world if the Pearson administration has its way. We have had the centennial celebrations and the Queen and Queen Mother and... but are these accomplishments of the parliamentarians? We have had lots of talk about ‘quiet diplomacy’ which is a new term meaning if you can’t say anything good, don’t say anything: or, where there’s money to be made why bother with honor. But why go on? It’s quite obvious that what the MPs stand badly in need of is some time in their constituencies to discover the real world of today. And we’re not thinking about time spent in quiet contemplation, or lolling on the banks of their favorite stream in splendid isolation. When _ All talk, no action bee? Principle of holiday with pay has ee fought for in the trade union if it eae there are times when one won- mind d apply to every one. This thought Miament When realizing that the members Septemh ave just taken off for a vacation © should ae | Mk at what be able to look back and say, well Was accomplished in the last session Vilner in Knesset "My heart is full Of pain and shame" the .) my pet (Israeli Parlia- ‘ of 1, Meir Vilner, §POke on «nr, COMMunist othe an. The behaviour *cupieg “og Population in of a titories and the threateni I People in the Sinei § a follows: Of Boyt) tens of thou- He ian Soldiers nie out rat and particular- bree €r. In the local any S there were pub- ony eg about the - jpousands of n the desert. inte “id Passed. Public a but noth; th the §0v- Pressur lo) : e and “Oss thes a ternational accordance ri iyle ae committee, e Tetu W re d, OUNded, who he as Press 8 Published in Oy Nd gi 2DK he Will be Nh, 8iv Tae) an en “the ey ys PeCial ‘ acilities h Ne, Is m Ocedure, stl Pe acs mean, !aving the to «dent the Presure. It a at a call was Ot Side thettion from Started a res. In Davar, June 13, was pulish- ed: “Many amongst the refugees claim that the Israelis are forc- ing the people of the western bank who are living in strategic places like Jenin, Kalkilya, Tul- Karm to leave their houses. They also state that they are allowed to take only their clothes with them.” In Ha’Aretz, June 20, was pub- lished that “those who crossed the lines are not allowed to re- turn back to the western bank.” Regarding -civiliaris in the Si- nai peninsula and in the Gaza strip Davar of June 13 writes: “Rav-sere (captain) Yusef said moreover, that the Israeli forces are trying to convince the civi- lians and the Egyptian soldiers who give themselves up, to-cross the canal and go to the west. But many of them are afraid and they do not want to leave their houses.” Concerning the situation in the occupied territories in the Western bank, in the Latroun region, I have in my hand an eye-witness report, an eyewit- ness who is — contrary to my opinion — a supporter of the war. I refer to the journalist of Yedioth Abronoth, Amos Kenan, and I think he also writes in Ha’Aretz. He writes in a report he sent to many people the fol- lowing: “The platoon commander said that the three villages of Beit- Nuba, Yalu, Amwas, in the Lat- roun sector should be demolish- ed because of strategic, tactical and security reasons. First in order to straighten the Latroun Wedge, second to punish the nests of murderers, third to deny a base for infiltrators in the fu- ture. It is possible to contend against this idiotic conception that calls for collective punish- ment ‘and which thinks that if an infiltrator loses a house, he cannot find another. It is pos- sible to argue the good that would come out of increasing vou «nada OF eve wo milli ie 83 On w, Sespite t prosperous? COnsi. St de og 8tdaras Se to be a prosperous nation, with high aN ee ge number So it is, on the surface. But poverty = Dai on citizens stil live in slums. ‘ One lege Tent of 4nadians earns less than $3,000 a year. Y ge than young Canadians between 14 and 2¢- Mhilli Tade VIII education. ‘ae Spent on low-cost housing in Canada £ urgent need for adequate housing. the number of our future ene- mies. But what for is the dis- cussion...” The eye-witness continues: “We were told that our task is to comb the houses of the vil- lage and if we find armed men to capture them. Unarmed peo- ple should be given time to col- lect their belongings and tell them to go to a neighbouring vil- lage, to Beit-Sira. We were also told, to stand by the entrance of the village and prevent the en- trance of villagers returning from their hiding places, after they heard our call to them over the radio that they can return in peace to their villages. We were ordered to shoot over their heads and to tell them not to enter the village.” s “With a strike of one bull- dozer the cypress and olive trees were uprooted; in ten minutes the house became debris to- gether with the belongings and the little furniture therein. After the demolishing of three houses, the first caravan of refugees ar- rived from the direction of Ra- mallah. We did not shoot in the air. Thos who speak Arabic amongst us came near them to pass the order. There were old people who walked with difficul- ty, wailing old women, infants in the arms of their mothers, youngsters and children who cried and begged for water. The caravan raised white flags.” We told them to go to Beit- Sira. They told us that from every place they are expelled and to no place they are allow- ed to enter. Four days they have already been moving without food, without water and some of them already died.” Hereafter, Amos Kenan, re- lates what happened and says that there were official an- nouncements but the actual or- ders were the opposite. He then says: . . . “The children who went on the roads crying will be the Fedaeyyoun (comman- does after 19 years in the next round. In this way we lost on this day the victory.” These were the words of Amos Kenan. We all live within our people. Soldiers are returning. Every one heard about outrageous things that happened and that should not have happened to a civilian population after military opera- tions. Whole villages were eras- ed, not only in the Latroun dis- trict, but also in other places, “Are you sure you're ready fo govern yourself?” Fred Wright in U.E. News Service and all this after the military operations were Over... Few words concerning the de- portation of the Arab inhabi- tants of the ex-Jewish quarter in the old city of Jerusalem. I am not dealing now with the politi- cal aims of the war, but even the press that supports the war wrote yesterday and the day be- fore with anger against the transfer by force of these inha- bitants from their houses. Child- ren, old men, women carrying remnants of their belongings had to leave their houses. within few hours without any preparation, without any alternative lodging, and all this after all the military ‘operations were over. Is this not cruelty towards the civilian pop- ulation. The daily Ha’Aretz of yester- day, reports about organization- al chaos that ruled during the last days concerning the demo- lition of houses near the Wailing Wall. All the newspapers ask: what is happening here? What for is all this destruction? There is another problem. To the villages in the triangle, hun- gry and thirsty people are com- ing from the newly occupied ter- ritory and here they are expell- ed, although the same Israeli rule exists over both sides. The Security Council unani- mously called upon Israel to ex- ercise a humanitarian attitude towards the inhabitants of the occupied territories and to allow those expelled or fled from the occupied territories to return to their homes. The Security Coun- cil as well demanded from all states concerned to behave hu- manely towards prisoners of war. These cruel acts that were car- ried out lately raised protests from various public and cultural figures of various circles in the country. I received a petition ad- dressed to the President of the State of Israel, to the Prime Minister, to the Presidium of the Knevset and the Chief Rabbin- ate, signed by University lec- turers, teachers, architects, doc- tors and others. The petition says: “After reading reports in the Israeli press concerning the behaviour towards the Arab population in the occupied ter- ritories, and also after reading a report by an eye-witness, I join hereby my voice to the call to stop all acts of oppression, ex- pulsion, destruction of houses and property in the occupied ter- ritories and to extend humane aid to the civilian population in these regions.” We join this cal] raived by these intellectuals. I want to point out that a large number of soldiers refused to take part in these acts against the civilian population and there were even such people who pre- vented such acts by endanger- ing themselves. This behavior of the author- ities in the occupied territories, over and above the very fact of opening war brought immeasur- able damage to Israel. As a Jew who lost during the last world war all his family, my heart is full of pain and shame that it is the Government of Israel that launched a war which endangers world peace and that carries out shameful acts in the occupied territories against the civilian population. July 21, 1967—PACIFIC TRIBUNE—Page 3 | ae he