EDITORIAL PAGE x Comment We jobless full benefits | on the face of it the Diefenbaker government's bill to extend sup- | plementary “seasonal” unemploy- } ment insurance benefits until July 1 | looks like an advance token pay- } ment on Tory pre-election prom- is. In actuality it is a gesture that ‘adudes tens of thousands of job- } 6s workers not listed as “seasonal.” What the labor movement says, } ad what this paper joins it in say- | ig, is that regardless of what long } short-range works projects the | Tory government may have in mind, supplementary unemploy- | ment benefits should be paid to | "ety worker as of now, and paid intl he or she secures gainful em- yment. Anything short of that ‘simply playing cheap politics with | “inherent social evil. Thus the six-week “seasonal” | Tory handout which the Senate is | %¥ pondering for ratification, is }# insult to working people, em- ployed and unemployed alike. As though to add injury to in- jal, we now have Prime Minister |Diefenbaker urging us to “spend, ] spend, and spend” as a means of unemployment. And here in BC., Premier Bennett has taken | the same theme, exhorting all 4 sundry not to “become scared vhen a little recession comes.” Both |) Meadopted President Eisenhower's : theme song, without mentioning } "0%, where, or by what means an my of nearly one million jobless nada (and approximately six a half million in the U.S.) are ig to get anything to “spend.” Gearly, such “economists,” if re serious, belong somewhere than in leading government Being capitalist politicians, er, their “economics” are on with their concern for the job- ific Tribune Phone MUtual 5-5288 ditor — TOM McEWEN ing Editor — HAL GRIFFIN 3 Subscription Rates: One Year: $4.00 ' Six months: $2.25 3 Published weekly at wom 6 — 426 Main Street _ Vancouver 4, B.C. anadian and Commonwealth ries (except Australia): $4.00 year. Australia, United States ‘all other countries: $5.00 one year. less victims of their short-sighted cold war policies and its resultant economic crisis. To “spend, spend, and spend” requires jobs, pay envelopes, sup- plementary benefits until jobs are available, new markets and new trade relations with the whole world, based on mutual respect and friendship. The Diefenbaker government has — given no indication that it plans to seek or work for, despite its pre- election “pledge” and its March 31 “mandate” to do just that. A nation-wide campaign of pres- sure by organized labor, farmers and the people generally might assist the Diefenbaker government to grasp the hard fact that approxi- mately one million jobless workers is not a political football to be kicked around at will, or soothed by a handful of peanuts and a “spending” theme song. They de- mand something to spend—and that means jobs, and full jobless insur- ance benefits until jobs are avail- able! Taxation without return THE reactions of Vancouver tax- payers to current civic tax in- creases, like their fellow taxpayers in other municipalities, are many and varied. First there is the homeowner who resents paying a high rental in civic taxes for the privilege of living in his own home. For every improve- ment he has added there is the accompanying “penalty” of higher taxation. Many in this group are deciding to “sell” their homes and move into high-priced apartments. Then there is the “escapist” tax- payer who seeks refuge in some outlying and relatively undeveloped suburb, willingly accepting limited services for what he hopes will be lower taxes, only to find the taxes climbing year by year with no ap- preciable return in services. (It is said of Burnaby that its early settlers and pioneers located in that area to escape Vancouver's heavy taxes. Now Burnaby taxes are as high as Vancouver’s, with a little added for the magnificent “View” to be had from both North and South Burnaby). There is yet another Vancouver taxpayer, literally the “forgotten man,” thousands of him, and the most abused of all. He doesn’t grumble too much about the rising mill rate on his home, but would like to see some tangible returns for fifty years of increasing taxes, other than a horde of parking meter sleuths. He sees fine streets, avenues, curbs and boulevards winding in and out of the new high-priced sub- divisions, while practically nothing is spent in his own area. The street or avenue in front of his own door is like Westminster Avenue (now Main Street) in the nineties. Ruts, ditches and “drainage” holes at intersections—full of mud in wet weather and full of dust in dry. For such taxpayers a bit of badly- needed road work in scores of city blocks would be a fine gesture. It would help convince him that he was getting some little return for his money, and that City Hall had some other interest in his welfare other than picking his pockets clean. It would also be a fine Centen- nial achievement to give miles of Vancouver's streets and avenues a 1958 rather than an 1886 “look.” HE large and varigated num- ber of “socialist” periodicals, mimeographed leaflets and such publications received in this office from groups and_ individuals across Canada and the U.S. shows that a lot of people other than those of the CCF and LPP are thinking about the need of a new social order. In the U.S. there are many such authors, obviously strong “indi- vidualists’ who spend a lot of their own time and money (and we do know something about printing costs) publishing and mailing such periodicals. The general tenor of many of these “socialist” productions is anti- capitalist, anti-Catholic, anti- Communist, but also strongly pro- Soviet Union and pro-People’s China. What I like most about these leaflets and periodicals is not their confused individualism, but the courage (and obvious finan- cial sacrifice) of the authors to spread the seeds of — socialist thinking. They are not afraid to append their signatures to their views on how they think social- ism is to be attained. Then there is another type of “socialist” publication, what one might call post-20th Congress (Communist Party of the Soviet Union) vintage. This is largely produced by groups of ex-Com- munist and ex-LPP elements. Many of these deserted the Com- munist movement because they suddenly discovered, some of them after many years of pos- turing as Communist “leaders”, that the social science of Karl Marx and V. I. Lenin were totally “alien” and unworkable in Can- ada or other English-speaking countries. With a few rare exceptions, these new “socialist” architects of a brand new world find their greatest pastime and _ pleasure lambasting the Marxist party they shamelessly deserted, and offering sage advice to the launchers of 14%2-ton Sputniks-on how to run their internal and foreign affairs. Reminds us of the little boy offering advice to grandmother on how to make an omelette. Then there is a third variety of “socialist” periodicals and let- ters, all strictly anonymous, The writers are of the “poison pen” variety, specializing in slander, falsehood and misrepresentation against the LPP and its member- ship in every field of its activity; against the Soviet Union and all its works. They outdo Marx in their “Marxism” and out-Zion the Zionists in their Zionism. And, of course, a little collobora- tion with the RCMP is not con- sidered out of “line” with their “Marxist” fulminations. Excluding the last category of “Socialists” who, like a_ well- known specie of rodent, prefer to gnaw in the dark of anony- mity, and whe have little claim to Marxism and less to common decency, it is obvious that a great ferment of socialist think- ing is going on among individuals and group circles outside the established Marxist parties in Canada and the U.S. It is also clear, despite ideo- logical or other differences sep- arating all such groups, that in the struggles ahead accentuated by the rising crisis of capitalism and no less by the rising victories of world socialism, all such group- ings will be inevitably drawn together in greater unity of pur- rose —to achieve the end they desire, socialism. Many of these “socialist” pub- lications show the “germ of an idea” which soon may become a mighty material force for North American socialism. May 23, 1958 — PACIFIC TRIBUNE—PAGE 5 teers 5 em