Engineers by the U.S. National Labour Relations Board, and the Ontario Labour Relations Board. It stands as a warning that future attempts should not be made to carve splinter groups out of the IWA membership, as such action is detrimental to the interests of all concerned. IWA Holds Majority Seventy-nine powerhouse em- ployees were involved in the re- cent application made by the IUOE. The IWA_ now holds certification for approximately 27,000 employees in the coast lumber industry. Of this number approximately 20,000 are em- ployed in manufacturing plants, and 329 are employed in the powerhouse crews. More than sixty-five per cent of powerhouse employees are members of the IWA. Not Neglected During a fourteen-year period the IWA has negotiated for engi- neers and firemen along with the other employees and secured three special increases, which applied only to this group. In 1947, the IWA gained a 12% cents per hour increase for . engineers throughout the industry. In 1953, the special increase was 10% cents an hour for 2nd class engineers, 41% cents an hour for 3rd class engineers, and an average of 5 cents an hour for firemen. In 1956 a further special increase was obtained yielding 10 cents an hour for 2nd class, 7% cents an hour for 3rd class, 4%4 cents an hour for 4th class, and 3 cents an hour for firemen. The IWA pointed to this record as indi- cating that the interests of power- house employees had -not been neglected. Alberni Fiasco During the 1955 negotiations, after a settlement had been reached the IUOE attempted to obtain additional benefits by Poor Place To Work calling out the engineers in their plants in which they hold certi- fication. At Port Alberni eight men kept the plant closed for 1500 men for two weeks, attemp- ting without success to make a better deal. Despite the arguments raised by the IUOE before the B.C. Labour Relations Board in recent months, the IWA was able to prove that all skills in lumber manufacturing plants are integrated in a con- tinuous series of production pro- cesses. A stoppage anywhere in the line halts all operations. Each phase of production and manu- facture from the raw log to the finished product requires the con- stant integration and co-ordination of well-trained and highly Speci- alized personnel. The position taken by the IWA was supported by employers who gave evidence to the effect that the principle of industrial union- jsm, providing a uniform settle- ment for all employees, tends toward greater stability in labour- management relations. The recent action of the IUOE was the fourth unsuccessful challenge by the IUOE to industrial unionism in the B.C. lumber industry. It was also proven in evidence before the Labour Relations Board that within the present frame- work of industrial unionism there are effective and workable facili- ties for attention to the problems of special groups. Important evidence was given to the effect that when engineers and firemen were displaced by reason of technological changes in the development of power, the IWA had been successful in pro- viding for their absorption in other sections of the industry. This can only be done when rep- resentations are made through a single bargaining agency, it was stated. Canadian Forest Products Scored By Local 1-71 Submitted by Local 1-71 The Officers of Local 1-71, IWA, contend that the Englewood Logging Division is no longer the good place to work that it used to be. Over a period of years, the Engle- wood Logging Division was always looked upon as a good place to seek employment because it provided nearly year- round employment with a Management that treated their employees in a fair manner and also had a well-organized Union in all camps to deal with their problems. The problem at the present time stems from the new policy of the Company’s Head Office, of giving nothing, granting nothing and considering nothing, unless they are compelled to do so. This now happens no matter how valid the grievances are or how clearly they are defined in the Union Contract. Not By Merit This in the opinion of the Local Union Officers created embarass- ment to Supervisory Officials in the Englewood Division because problems are now judged not by merit but rather, “The Head Office's decision?” The Local Officers have en- countered many problems which should be considered as routine but now settlement is arrived at with the Company when settle- can no longer be avoided. ‘There are also several major problems being dealt with at this time. Camp Management and Committees are making a sincere | Officials in the Company Head difficulty in attempting to estab- lish Compensation Claims. The Head Office policy, aided and abetted by their Safety Depart- ment, is to gum up Compensation claims in every manner possible. The Local Officers have ex- perienced on a number of occas- ions where Head Office Officials attempted to put injured work- |. men on the M.S.A. and Sick Benefit Plan when they were entitled to coverage by Work- men’s Compensation. The Local Union Officers fin- ally made strong protest to the; Company on this matter. Now they find a new policy of where an employee has not been covered by Compensation and makes appli- cation for coverage under the Welfare Plan, the Company takes the position that if an employee appealed his Compensation case, he then, by his actions, disqualifies himself from the Welfare Plan. Company Administered On investigation, the Local Officers found that the Welfare Plan is administered by Company ac I CANADIAN COLLIERIES LIMITED camp-site at the head of Indian River on the North Arm of Burrard Inlet. Office. They receive applications for coverage by the Welfare Plan in the Company office and make payment from the Company office, this the Local Officers contend places the Company Officials in a position of hanging over the heads of their employees the big club. This places the Company in a position of where they can say to their employees, don’t appeal your Compensation claim or you will disqualify yourself from welfare benefits! Another problem encountered by the Local Officers is that the Company has a policy of where an employee is on Compensation and his claim is finalled, that em- ployee, before returning to work is asked to go to a Doctor in the employ of the Company, paid by the Company for a medical check- up before he is permitted to return to work. This Doctor of course is not responsible to the Compensa- tion Board but only to the Com- pany. This matter has been discussed on a number of occasions between the Local Officers and Company Officials and regardless of facts, fo Ee le a DEAR SUARTHA pa G Ek ARO RT Le , PLEASE COME TBAEK From Page 1 |“Committee” in the various ridings to co-oper- ate with the CCF organizations in the ridings and co-ordinate all activities on behalf of resident trade unionists. ae The Federation is appealing for donations of one dollar per mem- ber from all affiliates. Funds raised by the Federation will be expended by the Federation. In agreement with the Joint Cam- paign Committee, responsibility for a number of campaign projects is being assumed by the Federa- tion, and financed independently. The Federation is continuing its political education program to acquaint trade unionists with the issues in the current election of special importance to them. regardless of right of the indi- vidual, under the Compensation Act and the Union agreement the answer is invariably the same. No. Seek Justice : The Officers of Local 1-71 want it clearly understood that they have no intention of allowing this situation to continue and will do everything in their power to see that the membership of Local 1-71 receive justice at the hands of the Company. L Promise wor 7o wear My RANTS, — 70 Eb ACAI. SHOE MANUFACTURING CO. (B.C.) LTD. 2248-50 East Hastings St. Vancouver, B.C. UNION MADE