hoe of the few major news- it Publishing in Chile under : 80 gata is the notorious Santi- mi pit wing daily, El Mercurio, ee first saw the light of day be Ntury ago in Valparaiso and pe its career by printing pee cial information. Its Publisher was Agustin Ed- s McClure, who made his ne in banking and mining. € present owner, McClure’s ndson Agustin Edwards East- Dap ae Chile after the Popu- ‘, nity Government came to 5 €r and found himself in the ton, Eastman’s ties with U.S. Opolies are such that he be- dent an executive vice presi- of Pepsicola. Uercutio's brother papers, A Sp, Itimas Noticias and La Dtalinn also both represent ca- “and ¢ and right wing causes | Seetign esustently supported Ultra se ditions which openly called for letacs and a coup against Stren €s government. The der u8th-of El Mercurio was evi- . = 1964 when Frei came to act Sidency. His first public torial 88 to visit the paper’s edi- huppin ences tobe photographed Ripe Re its director, Rene Silva Cutio's @ known fascist. El Mer- Sum. Policy toward Allende is 0 up in an_ editorial veto, after Popular Unity’s consti, His respect for the Noth ution is a pretense and Nak more...” Bustin Edwards’ empire forty pa BG MERCURIO ( ah Rechozodas Renuncias Na Cates Minint Urowe de tbe Exporter Veet .a Protesta Surge desde el Almacén EL MERCURIO Gebierne no Aceptara Actos © Heaias an Hiwteas Aorinntae | Eximbank Apl za Créditos a stretches far beyond the three papers into stock companies, banking and magazine publish- ing. One of his firms, Lord Co- chrane Publishing, grinds out love magazines, “women’s” ma- gazines, teen-age and children’s magazines and one pornography sheet. Before the Allende govern- ment came to power, Edwards was president of the Inter- American Society of the Press, United Breweries Co., La Chi- leana Insurance Company and Edwards Bank. Some of these companies are run in partner- ship with Rockefeller’s Interna- tional Basic Economy Corpora- tion. ce FUNERAL TURNS INTO PROTEST M Prope: insight into the Chilean i resistance is contained S moving account by Time Tag fers” Of Pablo Neruda’s Dean tdreds of mourners ap- home A the Communist poet’s Mocesg; Santiago for the funeral tal oO" to the capital’s Gen- metery. In bold defiance of the junta’s anti-Marxist cam- paign and in obvious disregard for their own liberty, they chanted leftist slogans as the cortege marched slowly to the mausoleum. Softly at first, then louder and louder, they sang the Internationale. Some _ shouted Neruda y Allende, un solo com- batiente (Neruda and Allende, one fighter)! OTTAWA — A four-man Pol- ish forestry mission led by Po- land’s Minister of Forestry and Wood Industries recently visit- ed Canada, and discussed sub- stantial forestry developments in Poland and the capability of Canadian suppliers and consult- ing engineers to share in this development. Mr. Popko and his delegation visited equipment manufactur- ers and consulting engineering firms in the Montreal and Van- couver areas to determine the expertise available in Canada for the design and supply of the highly sophisticated equipment and engineering services requir- ed for pulp and paper and saw- mill plants. A new series of top Soviet films TORONTO—Soviet film buffs in this city will have the oppor- tunity to see 10 vintage Soviet films during the fall and winter, in addition to the regular Fri- ‘day showings at the Canada- USSR Association centre. : The following films will be shown Monday evenings at Honest Ed’s Poor Alex Theatre: Oct. 8, Eisenstein’s The Bat- tleship Potemkin (1925); Oct. 15, Pudovkin’s Storm Over Asia. (1927); Oct. 22, Eisenstein’s Alexander Nevsky (1938); Oct. 29, Ptushko’s The Stone Flower (1946); Nov. 5, Petrov’s The In- spector General (1953); Nov: 12, Pyryev’s The Idiot (1958); Nov. 19, Chukrai’s Ballad of a Soldier (1960); Nov. 26 DeMieli and Talankin’s Summer to Re- member (1960); Dec. 3, Hei- fetz’s The Lady with a Little Dog (1961); Dec. 10, Kozint- sev’s Hamlet (1964). Soviet Union severs relations with Chile UNITED NATIONS — In breaking diplomatic relations with junta-ruled Chile, the Sov- iet Union pointed out that after the coming to power of the mili- tary junta in Chile and with the connivance of the new Chilean authorities an intolerable situa- tion has been created for Soviet institutions and citizens work- ing in Chile on the basis of inter - state or inter - agency agreements and treaties. “A provocative campaign against the Soviet Union is be- ing fanned in the country, anti- Soviet sentiments are heing whipped up, and there have been acts of arbitrariness and violence against Soviet institu- tions and citizens in Chile.” The Soviet Government, through its Mission to the Unit- ed Nations, charges that, “‘mem- bers of the crew of the Soviet ship, Ekliptika were arrested, subjected to rude insults and manhandling on September 11. Despite persistent demands by the USSR Embassy, the military junta created groundless obstac- les for a week, preventing the transfer of members of the Soviet crew to the Soviet traw- ler, Stanyukovich, this creating a serious danger to the life and health of Soviet seamen.” The Soviet Union says that lawless acts “were committed against a group of Soviet per- formers in Chile. The office of Novosti press agency was raid- ed and searched,” and material damage inflicted. The TASS re- presentative was subjected to similar actions, and Soviet workers were arrested at a house-building complex. (pres- ented by the Soviet Government ‘as a gift to the Chilean people). There have been searches of the homes of Soviet citizens. ~ “These actions of the Chilean military,” the Soviet Govern- ment states, “the arbitrariness, lawlessness and mockery in re- yy : g . Fascist tanks attack the Moneda ‘in Santiago. spect of Soviet institutions and citizens sent to Chile on the re- quest of the Popular Unity gov- ernment to render friendly aid ‘to the Chilean people, are a rude violation of generally recogniz- ed norms of international law, deprive the Embassy of the USSR in Chile of the necessary conditions for the discharge of its functions, threaten the sec- urity of Soviet citizens and undermine the basis of normal relations between the USSR and Chile.” It says that the Soviet Gov- ernment regards as impossible the further presence of the USSR Embassy in Chile and states that it severs diplomatic relations with Chile and recalls from Chile the Ambassador of the USSR and the staff of the Soviet Embassy. — The Soviet Government de- mands that Chilean authorities “do not obstruct in any way the departure of Soviet citizens from Chile” and that they also “ensure their full security.” It states that “similar conditions will be ensured for the staff of the Chilean -Embassy in Mos- cow.” More insights on Sakharov from a CIA ‘Specialist’ on USSR a yy ERIK BERT the oe eddaway has come to September’ with a letter, dated Times T 26, to the New York October uch published it on | | Re ter rene Way wrote his letter af- dore Shae a dispatch by Theo- —% Time2d in the September Shabaq S: In that dispatch Sakharo Teported that Andrei 'Slephon’ Soviet physicist, “in a ‘ember i Interview today (Sep- x )» declined to take a rn against the junta . away rand that ‘Chile is too ele &q that'd Said Sakharov “insist- ite etude 8ppeal on behalf of grictl had been motivated Netation y humanitarian con- eG was in no wa °f the 4a as as Soaareerene Manche qavda, LH i i e da, umanité-Di- md the . aris), L’Unita (Rome), Yo; however, neither the “ mes, nor the Wash- ab nor any ‘of the & slanaectveyors of anti- V's appander, quoted Sakh PPeal, BRDRS ten ea iS statemen aS in fact a writ- a] Soviet =v, Sakharov, and : riters, Vladimir Maximov, and Alexander Ga- litch on September 18. But the message did not ap- pear in the U.S. press. Redda- way, and the Times (belatedly), have resolved the problem. ’ Sakharov’s message to the junta said, according to Redda- way: “Worried about the fate of the outstanding contemporary poet and winner of the Nobel Prize for Literature, Pablo Neruda, we appeal to you to fulfill the duties of the position you have occu- pied and to safeguard the free- dom and security of your re- markable citizen. One may agree or not agree with his world view and political posi- tion, but by his whole life and creative work he has proved to mankind the sincerity and puri- ty of the beliefs he has _ pro- pounded. “Pablo Neruda is not only a great Chilean poet but also the pride of all Latin American lite- rature. His glorious name Is !n- dissolubly bound up with the struggle of the peoples of Latin America for their spiritual and national liberation. The violent death of this great man would darken for a long time what your Government has proclaim- ed as the rebirth and consolida- tion of Chile. a “Humanity and magnanimity on your part to one of your best fellow countrymen would undoubtedly promote normal- ization ‘and relaxation of ten- sions both in your own country and in the whole world.” Reddaway commented angrily that the attacks on Sakharov present him “as a supporter of the junta.” He denounced the “distortions involved in these attacks.” He noted that the Times’ reporter, Shabad, has quoted “only one sentence from the appeal itself... “The central concerns of this appeal (when read in full) are too obvious to need commen- tary. None of them has any- thing in common with the gross distortions” perpetrated by Pravda, Tass, Humanité, Volks- stimme and Unita.” Sakharov’s appeal, “when read in full,” suggests that Sha- bad was well-advised not to quote it, for it shows Sakharov to be a most abject creature. Let us consider, first, not what Sakharov said about Pablo Neruda but about the junta. For, if he grovels before the junta, to what point is his glorifica- tion? : Sakharov and his buddies ap- pealed to the four fascist gene- rals to “fulfill the duties of' the position you have occupied.” He called on the to “safe- guard the freedom and security” of Pablo Neruda. What are, in Sakharov’s eyes, the “duties” of fascist generals? Do they really include, as he seems to think, safeguarding the “freedom and security” of a Communist poet? Sakharov ask- ed the generals to forget Neruda was a Communist, apparently: under the impression that the “duties” of fascist generals in- clude safeguarding the “freedom _and security’ of a non-Com- munist poet. Sakharov called: on the four fascist generals to recall that they had “proclaimed .. . the rebirth and consolidation of Chile.” No one else in the world, out- side of fascist ranks, has solid- arized himself with the junta’s proclamation of its goals as the “rebirth and consolidation of Chile.” Sakharov appealed to the “humanity and magnanimity” of the four fascist generals. Who else in the world, outside fascist ranks, would dare assert the “humanity and magnanimity” of the fascist murderers in Chile? Sakharov advised the four fascist generals to “promote normalization and _ relaxation” of the nation whose democracy they had just destroyed, whose. trade union movement they had outlawed, whose President they had murdered, whose Commun- ist and Socialist leaders were being hunted by its murder bands. Reddaway’s defense of Sakha- rov is not in_itself remarkable. He is a senior research fellow at. Columbia University’s Re- search Institute on Communist Affairs, a quasi-espionage insti- tution. Prior to that he was a “Soviet specialist” at the London School of Economics. He had been part of a group mobilized by the Central Intelligence Agency to advise its Radio Li- berty broadcasting. Radio Liberty said in 1971 that “. . .. the advice — and creative contribution — of the outside academic specialists in Soviet affairs and communica- tions have played a major part” in RL’s work. : The U.S. Library of Congress’ analysis of Radio Liberty, un- dertaken at the request of Sena- tor J. W. Fulbright, pointed to one such example of RL’s co- option of “outside” anti-Soviet- eers. : “Perhaps, one of the most _ recent illustrations of this prac- tice was the panel broadcast discussion held in London, Eng- land on April 23, 1971. Partici- pants in this panel were some of the Western world’s leading Soviet (anti-Soviet)—-EB speci- alists,” the Library of Congress study said. One of the specialists in this CIA-RL. discussion was Peter Reddaway, Sakharov’s cham- pion. This political background ‘of Reddaway was not revealed by The New York Times. —Daily World PACIFIC TRIBUNE—FRIDAY, OCTOBER 19, 1973—PAGE 9