By KIMBAL CARIOU MOOSE JAW — Meeting two weeks after the defeat of the New Democratic Party (NDP) government of Alan Blakeney, the Saskatchewan convention of the Canadian Union of Public Em- Ployees, (CUPE), May 7-9, tackled the issues of the right to strike, wage controls and other pressing concerns. Delegates also debated the problem of labor unity, which was badly strained here over the question of support to the NDP. During the recent election, the Saskatchewan Federation of Labor (SFL) backed the NDP, over the ob- jections of CUPE. Five thousand Striking hospital workers were ordered back to work by the NDP’s Bill 45 just before the campaign, leading CUPE to runa protest candidate and to call for spoiled ballots in. most ridings. Reporting on the last year's activity, CUPE maps fightback to Saskatchewan division president Blake Adamson noted that CUPE members were forced to strike in Moose Jaw, Lloydminster and Prince Albert, as well as at the province’s hospitals. “The coming year will be even more critical to the laborimovement in Sask- atchewan than the past year, with the election of a Conservative government”’ ‘ he said. ‘‘It will demand even more dedi- cation and sacrifice’. A highlight of the convention was “Fightback 1982’’, a policy paper deal- ing with union strategy. It put forward concrete proposals for SFL activity to repeal Bill 45 and Section 11-2(d) of the Trade Union Act, both of which restrict labor’s right to strike. The fightback program, and other re- solutions, also dealt with the danger of wage controls, supporting the idea of a one-day general strike against the intro- duction of controls if necessary. Other resolutions called for: improvements in workers’ compensa- tion; affirmative action for women, Na- tive people, and the disabled; imple- mentation of the previous government’s Day Care Advisory Committee recom- mendations for better child Care; uni- _Versal sickness and accident insurance; action against expected Tory cutbacks; and defence of the minimum wage and other labor legislation which Tory cabinet ministers have threatened. Many delegates spoke bitterly about the NDP’s repeated use of back-to-work laws in recent years, culminating in Bill 45. That record, and the SFL executive’s refusal to actively ‘Support the hospital workers, led the convention to pass a resolution condemning the SFL for its “total lack of support for the right to strike”. But, proposals for CUPE’s dis- affiliation from the SFL were not con- sidered. Instead, delegates resolved that “the Division Executive again work to face Devine mobilize a large CUPE delegation (to the next SFL convention) and to mobilize support for candidates for the SFL executive who will actively fight for the interests of labor.”’ A strong challenge to the right-wing members of the current executive is expected to arise at the SFL convention this fall. Dealing with other issues, the con- vention took a firm stand against the arms race. Resolutions called on the fed- eral government to support dis- armament, to make Canada a nuclear- free zone, and to not allow Cruise missile tests in Canada. A halt to the develop- ment of nuclear energy was demanded. A resolution on technological change called for an end to layoffs, a 32-hour work week, arid the right to negotiate technological change. But, while the convention dealt extensively with labor's fightback on this and other im- mediate issues, no long-range economic proposals were put forward for debate. DID ANYONE EVER THINK OF WHAT WE WOULD DO APTER WE'VE TAKEN OVER THE FARMS 2 = es dul \ ) Uae ee at w ei a aE Family farm threatened OTTAWA — Canadian family farms are falling into the hands of banks and land speculators the Canadian Federation of Agriculture warned agricultural ministers, including Agriculture Minister Eugene Whelan and Finance Minister Allan MacEachen, ina meeting May 19. Federation statistics show interest on Canadian farm debt rose to $2. 1-billion last year, up $600-million from 1980. The federation claims farmers can’t afford to pay interest rates above 17% when they are receiving fixed prices on their produce. The federation reported that a number of producers have sold their farms and it is banks, land speculators and professional people who are taking over the land, not other farmers. UTE EUUSRUGEEUEGULELEL OOD ELESUEREUSUROGEAEL — Local’s autonomy denied | TORONTO — Faced with the threat of trustee- ship by their international union, Local 1669 Car- penters in Thunder Bay reversed an earlier deci- sion May 17 to affiliate to the Canadian Labor Congress through the Ontario Federation of Labor. Local 1669 had made its decision to join the CLC after taking a referendum vote of its members last year which decided the local should remain within both the international and the congress, thus reject- ing any moves toward a breakaway from the CLC being engineered by the U.S.-based internationals. Since last May the local had been paying its per capita dues payments directly to the CLC, protest- ing the international’s unilateral move, along with the other building trades internationals, to stop paying dues to the congress. The Thunder Bay Carpenters’ local decided “with the greatest reluctance and under the most Serious objections’’, to withdraw from the CLC and stop per capita payments to all organizations but the international, after being threatened by Carpenters’ international vice-president John Car- ruthers with being placed under trusteeship. It is this kind of heavy-handed interference in the internal democracy of a Canadian local, not to mention the total negation of Canadian workers’ right to autonomy that has sparked angry resent- ment within the ranks of the International Brother- hood of Electrical Workers (IBEW), over a new two-year contract, and which casts a sombre shadow over current contract talks in Ontario’s building trades. Right now, in Ontario, both the Bricklayers and the Sheet Metal Workers are on strike with the contractors’ organization in their industry and the. central issue in both strikes is Strengthening of contract language dealing with the hiring of unem- ployed workers. The electricians have been the first trade in On- tario to ratify a two-year contract which was voted. on by some 45% of the members. The pact’s critics say it is a ‘‘sell out’’ that threatens to set a negative pattern for other con- tract talks presently going on. Ratified May 8, the contract is opposed by members who say the $2 an hour annual wage hike, in the two-year agreement won’t properly cover increased inflation, travel expenses and the rising cost of living. They also point out that despite some 108 de- mands being placed on the table, not a single improvement in working conditions was won. In fact, there is a lot of anger over the union’s agree- ~ ment in writing to allow contractors to bring work- ing foremen on a job, regardless of how many unemployed union members are higher up on the ‘out of work list’’. As well, there is criticism of the union’s agreement that contractors. can put fore- men on individual jobs if they want to, rather than limiting them to a project by project basis as was previously the case. Of the IBEW’s 11,000 members, only 2,859 (with about half of that number from Toronto), voted for the agreement, while 1,913'voted against. The turnout against the contract was heavy in Sud- bury, Windsor, Hamilton, St. Catharines and Kingston. The IBEW militants see the main cause of - deteriorating standards and contracts in both the province-wide _ bargaining legislation that was forced on construction workers by the government of Ontario and the international union bureaucrats, as well as from the rupture by the internationals of the building trades from the Canadian Labor Con- gress. The invitation by the Canadian Federation of. Labor to Prime Minister Trudeau to the CRIES inaugural convention is seen by many as an identi- fication of the top international building trade leadership in Canada with the reactionary policies of the federal government, and all of the impli- cations that contains in the way of promoting concessions and roll backs in wages and working conditions. ) aa Major strikes halt Alberta building projects PACIFIC TRIBUNE—MAY 28 EDMONTON — More than 6,000 plumbers and pipefitters walked out on strike May 3 with several other building trades unions threatening to follow. Earlier, 93% of the Northern (Alberta) and 80% of the Southern plumbers and pipefitters voted in favor of strike action. Members of the United Association of Plum- bers and Pipefitters Local 488 are bargaining for a 30% increase in wages Over two years and are now eaming $18.32 an hour. Construction projects, totalling more than one billion dollars in Northern Alberta have been halted by the plumbers’ picket lines. Contracts for 40,000 building trades and construction workers expired April 30. Only four out of 29 construction locals in the 17 trades have initialled tentative collective agreements, so far. The president of the Iron- workers local, W. Lisowski has charged the contractors’ bar- gaining agency, the Construction Labor Relations (CER): of “playing one trade against another’’ and has dismissed the contractors’ claims of economic hardship. He said inside information shows that contractors have ten- dered bids of up to 15% higher this . year in anticipation of increased costs. Jack Dyck, president of the: Northern Alberta Building and Construction Trades Council ac- cused the CLR of ‘dragging their feet’’, and said “building trades workers were in their worst bar- gaining position in twenty years.” The CLR has threatened to lock out all of the building trades unions after May 20 as a result of the plumbers strike. They are of- fering the plumbers only $3.50 an hour over two years. Several other trades have ac- cused the CLR of bargaining in bad faith and most have already voted in favor of strike action. The contractors, suppliers and major site contractors are the key force in the Construction Labor Relations and they hope to weaken the bargaining position of the craft unions. With the cancellation of the. multi-billion dollar Alsands pro- ject, and the general slowdown in new construction, the contractors are united in the negotiations with the building trades. On the other hand,*the building trades unions are negotiating on an individual basis against united bosses. PACIFIC TRIGUNE™MAY 28 132" Page 9 HHRAMAMNMOAIAUNNNNNANNMANKaRNn A — Page ‘ : : :