Delegations denied right to speak Continued from page 1 Warnett Kennedy, Helen Boyce and Doug Little all got up to state that the 51.7 percent majority that voted for wards in the plebiscite was ‘‘not a big enough majority.’’ At one point a near hysterical Kennedy waved his finger at Marzari and Rankin shouting, ‘‘you cheated, you cheated’? to win the ward plebiscite. After voting down Rankin’s mo- tion, council then approved mayor Volrich’s governmental review commission which will be charged with the responsibility to: @give ‘‘consideration’’ to the merits of some form of a ward system. 5 @consider the size of city coun- cil. e@ consider the length of the terms for councils and the frequency of elections. : @ consider qualifications for can- didates. @ consider the role and powers of the mayor. ¢ “‘Nothing but a cheap attempt to sabotage the ward plebiscite,’’ Har- court termed the commission. “There is no such thing as an in- dependent commission.”’ Vietnam aid rally Mar 25 The Vietnamese ambassador to Canada, Tran Tuan Anh, will be the feature speaker at a giant rally to raise financial and material aid for Vietnam, Sunday March 25, 2:00 p.m. at the Queen Elizabeth Playhouse Theatre. _ The rally has been called by the Canadian Aid for Vietnam Civilians who have called for donations at the rally. The ‘‘other issues’’ added by the mayor are ‘‘nonsense’’, Rankin ad- ded. ‘‘The only point at issue is the structure of government—and that has already been studied and decid- ed by the voters.’ If the result of the plebiscite had been reversed, the NPA’ers would be righteously pro- claiming, ‘‘the people have spoken,’’ Rankin said. ‘‘Well, the people have spoken.”’ The appointees to the ‘‘govern- mental review commission’”’ are to be decided later in camera, but a suggested list of 10 people supplied by the mayor came under heavy at- tack from Rankin and Harcourt who charged that seven out of eight likely to accept are committed sup- porters of the at large system. Volrich’s proposed list of names, five of which are to be chosen, in- cluded two senior provincial court judges, chief justice Alan McEachern, provincial court judge Darrell Jones, neither of whom ‘‘could possibly serve’’ said Rankin, three former NPA aldermen, Brian Calder, Halford Wilson and Marianne Linnell, two former senior city officials, John Oliver and Ron Thompson, current city director of social planning Maurice Egan, SFU professor and former Tory candidate Edward McWhinney and UBC professor Robert Clarke who has published papers supporting the at large system. “Don’t expect anybody to have confidence in that list,’? Rankin said as he described the supposedly “secret list’? of names. A later motion by Darlene Mar- zari that the members of the com- mission also include representatives of public interest groups such as the Board of Trade, the Vancouver Labor Council and Neighborhood Services Association was also defeated by an eight to three vote. PEOPLE AND ISSUES In addition to refusing to hear delegations on the ward issue, coun- cil also voted not to hear represen- tation from the Hastings Sunrise Action Council on the PNE multiplex and to limit the number of delegations that can be heard on appeals for civic grants to six. The latter decision will effectively block mass mobilizations such as those of the past three years in support of the Downtown Eastside Residents Association’s appeal. In yet another controversial and dictatorial decision, council also voted to take over the services of the Downtown Community Health Society as requested by Socred health minister Bob McClelland. Council’s abrupt decision occasion- ed a scolding from Rankin who lec- tured the NPA’ers on ‘‘the basics of democracy.’’ Rankin charged that the council was ‘“‘taking over’’ a democratically based community service for narrow, political reasons on the strength of a letter from the province and without any knowledge of the real issues. Rankin charged that the allegations against the Health Society were ‘‘a tissue of lies’’ that could not be substantiated. Council would not miss the op- portunity to take over the Society, however, in an attempt to score political points on DERA and voted .seven to four to defeat Rankin’s motion to defer the matter to com- mittee for investigation, and then eight to three to take over the ser- vices. “One of the blackest days for democracy in Vancouver’s history,’” COPE president Bruce Yorke described council’s actions after a COPE executive meeting - '. Wednesday morning. The executive decided ‘‘that the widest possible publicity be given to the specific ac- tions taken by the NPA council. hey were incredible enough at the time, but in light of the reports last week about RCMP inter- rogation of members of the Canadian Union of Public Employees, the statements last month by Burnaby RCMP sergeant Paul Starek are even more astoun- ding. He told a press wire reporter that the policy of the RCMP “‘is to lessen labor tension, not to en- courage it”’ and added “‘We are tryng to end the 1930’s distrust of the police ...”’ : Readers will be forgiven if they find it difficult to reconcile those comments with the fact that more than a year ago, the chief of RCMP intelligence admitted that various union leaders had been made targets of surveillance. Those who were involved in the Lenkurt strike who saw the RCMP activities right in Starek’s own bailiwick will also be less than convinced. But what is perhaps more ominous is the increasing ap- pearance — both overtly and covertly according to in- telligence parlance — of the RCMP around the labor movement. Starek’s remarks, in fact, were in response to a directive issued to CUPE staff members from Grace Hartman, president of the Canadian Union of Public Employees, instructing them to avoid any contacts with the RCMP, especially where such contacts ‘‘could be used as a source of information for the RCMP.’’ Hartman’s directive was, in turn, prompted by reports from the union office in Toronto where the RCMP paid a visit, and from a union Christmas party where, we’ve since learned, the RCMP showed up with officers from two public employees’ unions. Just what kind of a role the RCMP continues to play in relation to the labor movement can be seen in the post office. There, employees have often been con- fronted by the post offices own Security and Investiga- tion Brartch officers with information about their past records — based on details that could only come from sophisticated files, such as those kept by the RCMP. And S and I information seems to have been involved, according to postal workers, in the RCMP decision as to what people would be ‘“‘visited’’ and questioned about the CUPW strike last October. In issuing her directive, Hartman said, ‘‘I don’t feel that with their past record and history, the RCMP is compatible with a trade union.”’ That record hasn’t changed — in fact, given the list of illegal entries and other surreptitious activities ad- mitted by the RCMP before the McDonald Commis- sion, there’s more reason fo: distrust than in the 1930’s. At least then the Mounties didn’t have elec- tronic bugs. * * * | ee Fishermen and Allied Workers Union secre- tary George Hewison is very likely as well known around the labor movement as a singer as he is a trade union spokesman, but it may soon be that his and his wife Janet’s three children will upstage him. The three — twin sons Ross and Tim and daughter Leah aged ten and eight respectively — have already had a number of appearances, with their father George as back-up, performing, among other places, at the Christmas party for the B.C. Government Employees Union. And last Sunday, they stole the show at the an- nual Congress of Canadian Women’s International Women’s Day celebration at the PNE B.C. Building theatre. ; Their picture appears on page 10. * * * Iso on page 10, readers will find a new feature— Economic Facts — which comes to us from the economists at the Trade Union Research Bureau, Emil Bjarnason and David Fairey. The first piece, exposing the real purpose of Bennett’s free share program, begins the series and we will carry it as a weekly feature. Other labor papers will also be receiving the articles regularly. There has long been a need for popular material reflecting the Bureau’s research work and we hope readers will find it informative — and useful. * * * j\or those subscribers to whom the late-arriving Tribune was becoming more of an historical docu- ment than a newspaper, we hope that the scheduling changes which we instituted last week will bring some results. Problems with press scheduling and congestion in the post office at week’s end created much of the pro- blem and, in an effort to overcome it, we’ve moved our editorial deadline back several hours. We hope that by printing and mailing half a day earlier, readers will get their paper a day or more earlier — perhaps as soon as Friday in the Vancouver area. Reports so far have been encouraging but if your paper isn’t coming any earlier — or if it’s later than usual — give us a call. And our thanks for your pa- tience. PACIFIC TRIBUNE—MARCH 16, 1979—Page 2 ae ‘Black day for democracy’ © = ary . a ey a SB Tome RT ATTEN, Y 1 Yi. 0% Rae ~~ An artists conception of what the Trade and Convention Centre “ ff ai iy) f iW if] Hf y W may look like, for as yet there are no real plans. The CPR presently holds a 20 year lease on Pier BC, site of the centre, and is deman- ding $10 million from the city just to give up the lease. Its nothing short of a hold up, however, as the Pier’s full assessed value is only $6 million. City subsidizing CPR on convention centre By ALD. HARRY RANKIN When the present NPA dominated city council reversed the decisions of last year’s council regarding the building of a Trade and Convention Centre on .Pier B.C., it didn’t tell the citizens that this was only the first phase of a much larger development plan for the whole central waterfront area stretching from the Bayshore Inn to Burrard Street. Business interests and their NPA spokesmen in Council not only want the three levels of government to build a $26 million tax free Trade and Convention Centre for them, to which they won’t contribute a nickel, not even for taxes or operating expenses. They also want the National Harbours Board to build a Cruise Ship facility for them free of charge. On top of that private developers want to build a big hotel next to the Trade and Convention Centre, while the CPR (Marathon Realty) wants to build a big commercial facility over its tracks that will in- clude a hotel, office space and other commercial buildings. The whole development would cost upwards of over $130,000,000. But that still isn’t all. The private developers, with the CPR in the lead, are demanding that. public’ money be used to subsidize these private developments by providing parking space. and other public space and facilities. Furthermore these private developers are now demanding that density rates for the area be doubl- ed, which would enable them to build a wall of high rises on the waterfront. z This plan was endorsed in princi- ple by city council on March 6. On- ly Darlene Marzari and I voted against it. I made my opposition clear on at least two grounds. The first was that public money is being used to subsidize rich private developers at a time when the NPA city council is claiming that it stands for fiscal responsibility. These sub- sidies. to the CPR are completely unjustified and completely ir- responsible. .The CPR, which has lived like a leech on Vancouver ever since its birth, wants still more of our financial life-blood. And this NPA-CPR dominated council is quite willing to act as a collection agency for the CPR, transferring your tax. dollars from your pockets. to the CPR. ro (On the other hand city council at" the same meeting after agreeing to subsidize the CPR by several millions of dollars turned down my motion to give the Downtown Eastside Residents Association (DERA) a grant of a few thousand ' dollars to carry on its work among ~ the poor and handicapped in the downtown area.) : The second reason I opposed this plan, and especially the increase in the permissible density, is that it will result in a wall of buildings that will completely shut off the view of the waterfront. That view would be restricted to the business people who use the hotels and the Trade and Convention Centre. As for the public, the CPR couldn’t care less. It’s another case of the same old con game. When developers first present their plans, they portray them as making all sorts of wonder- ful views and facilities available to the public. But when they get down to the nitty-gritty of development, these public amenities are quickly eliminated. COPE raps VSB scab contracts — The education committee of the ‘Committee of Progressive Electors this week blasted the Vancouver School Board for awarding con- tracts to non union cartage com- panies and breaking long standing practice of using union labor for VSB work. The VSB action ‘‘supports Socred right to work initiatives’ and can only lead to confrontation with employees, COPE education committee chairperson Dr. Pauline Weinstein said. COPE. called on the VSB to reconsider its decision ‘‘and not risk. jeopardizing even more its relation- ship with the labor movement.”’ i he Cee ee