1 ll aechalMLULL ~ ay Farah, head of the Cuban delegation to the Habitat conference, akes the podium to deliver his address. —Sean Griffin photos . | , By 1980, wewill have completed the transformation of the rural areas of our country.” th hat is one of the main goals of © Soviet people, G. N. Fomin, ad of the Soviet delegation to eat told a Vancouver press imucrence, emphasizing that a Creases in the standard of living n both rural and urban areas were Central objectives in the recent P Congress of the Communist arty of the Soviet Union. Fo the wide-ranging conference, Min discussed problems of abitat as well as a number of national and international issues. f Ousing cannot be separated for | Yerall plans for the development “te Soviet economy, he said. ih; €, in the Soviet Union, want to of takes balanced development | facili € economy which will ai. itate and encourage im- | ,,°’ements in human settlements. 'S is coming about through the Velopment of regional planning n tems which will fit in to an ©rall plan for the whole country. all Oday, more than 90 percent of cee and over 70 percent of al centres are guaranteed oe access to all facilities rec as theatres, exhibitions, and . T€ational centres. This is a vast but ovement over five years ago, aS it must be improved so that fi ‘ : : facilities » will enjoy the same A key factor to overcoming that en is the improvement of the Sai. ransportation system, he 2 ay min explained that one-half of | b Ousing costs are paid directly and th State in the Soviet Union, ; 55 at rents constitute no more eur or five percent of a a: S income. ‘The rent paid by sti Ividual covers a very small On of the total expenditures Fomi, M maintaining that home,” by N Said “The balance is paid © State as well.” Uring the press conference, the str x Minister of housing con- World On repeated his call for at tg disarmament in order bein € vast amounts currently treed poet on the arms race be housin Cope with the problems of Most countries in the world With. have enough money to cope a eir housing problems, but : ney is not being used in that ea Th “ “ *he arms race, and inflated Rural, urban equality aim of soviet plans defence budgets, both require vast expenditures.” He emphasized the Soviet Union has submitted numerous resolutions on disarmament to the United Nations General Assembly, including one which called upon all states to reduce arms expenditures by 10 percent per year in order to better. utilize their resources. “‘We’ve got to settle once and for all the question of nuclear disar- mament — either wholly or in a piecemeal fashion so that these vast resources can be utilized for the good of the people,’’ he declared. ‘‘But,’’ he warned, ‘“‘the problems of the arms race can only be solved through international agreement. Each revolution must be able to defend itself against imperialist aggression, and the Soviet Union and other socialist countries find our arms ex- penditures determined by that fact..’ Fomin also addressed himself directly to one of Habitat’s main points of contention: the control of and use of land. ‘‘Either land must be nationalized, or states must regulate firm control over the manner in which land is to be used,”’ he said. He urged more international cooperation in the field of human settlements, which he said would enable the solving of most of the world’s housing problems in a “relatively short period of time.” G.N. FOMIN .. . heading the Soviet delegation to Habitat. The Cuban delegation to Habitat has warned that the United Nations conference will not achieve any of its desired results unless pressure is brought to bear.upon im- perialism to end its wholesale exploitation of the third world. Levy Farah, Cuba’s construction minister and leader of the Cuban contingent at Habitat, told the eighth plenary session of Habitat that Cuba has always offered “‘her solidarious support to all op- pressed peoples that struggle to achieve liberation from the colonial yoke” and favors the rights of underdeveloped peoples to fully exercise their sovereignty and to use without restriction their natural resources. “We see with satisfaction that these aspects are included in the draft declaration of principles of this international conference.” Farah continued: ‘Lacking these great changes in in- ternational relations, there can be no human settlements policy, for decorous living conditions in countries which at present are underdeveloped cannot’ be established since these countries have been exploited and their ’ natural resources have for cen- turies been sacked by imperialist countries which at present: make boastful shows of wastefulness in their consumer societies in face of the impoverished majorities.” The Cuban national statement was one of the strongest con- demnations of imperialism delivered to the assembled delegates in the plenary sessions, and drew upon the experiences of foreign domination of the Cuban people by Spanish and U.S. colonialism and neo-colonialism, and warned that eliminating im- perialism is not a simple act of wishing it away. “It is not an easy matter to speak the language of international cooperation with those whose only law is the exploiting interest of the transnational companies. “It is not easy to imagine the higher human community to which we all aspire when at present enormous class_ differences, racism, discrimination of women, illiteracy and other social evils rule. “Tt is not easy to reconcile the high concern for man which rules this assembly and the bloody tyrannies supported by crime, torture and the most brutal smothering of human dignity.” In a later press conference farah elaborated on many of his statements to the plenary session. He said that a major redistribution of world wealth could be brought about only when control over the means of production and resources _ ..but on the © society. rest in the hands of the people of a country and not in the hands of huge foreign conglomerates. However, despite the role presently played by many developed western countries* Farah said that there is a great deal which these countries can do to speed the redistribution of wealth. “The first help which developed capitalist countries can give to the underdeveloped nations is to put an end to their exploitation of these less developed countries. The second help they can give is through extending cooperation in economic and technical assistance.” He stressed however that it would be incorrect not to dif- ferentiate between developed countries themselves. ‘‘There are two types of developed countries; the socialists countries of the world which historically have never exploited less developed countries, but have been most generous in extended aid and assistance to the underdeveloped world, and the imperialist nations of the world, primarily U.S. imperialism which continue to rape and exploit the third world. “As long as the imperialist countries exploit other countries we cannot speak of the third world as developing states, but rather as underdeveloped countries.” Farah said that many of the problems associated with im- provements in urban develop- ments are mirror images of problems of society. He explained that Cuba was proceeding with the development of multi-family highrise dwellings at a time when many countries are experiencing great social problems in these developments because in the Cuban scheme of housing man is fundamental. “Our houses, our cities, are planned to accommodate all of the requirements of children, young people and adults. It’s impossible for us to have a single family home for everyone because we need every acre of land for agriculture. “But the social problems which many countries have experienced are not reflections on the buildings We’re not talking about buildings causing social problems, but about class societies where one class exploits the other. That’s the root cause of social ills.”’ Referring .to Cuba’s own economic growth Farah explained that had Cuba not been faced with the threat of U.S. military invasion and acts of economic aggression such as the blockade, her growth would have proceeded at a much more rapid pace. “‘If we could have expended the energy and resources used in defending our revolution on improving the quality of life for the Cuban people, our growth would have been much quicker. “But you must remember, it is not the decision of each country to expend energy on defense. That decision is imposed on them by the aggressive stance of im- perialism.” As Habitat enters its final, days, the general plenary sessions have begun debate on recommendations from the three working com- mittees which have drafted proposals for national action, in- ternational cooperation, and a general statement of principles to guide further work in the field of human settlements. One of the more contentious issues to be debated, and one of particular interest to Canadians revolves around the question of land speculation. After a series of shifts in Canada’s position, a wg End exploitation of third = world Cuba tells Habitat proposal. which would make unearned profits accumulated through public decision or in- vestment subject to ‘“‘appropriate recapture’’ will be debated. Canada had originally stood opposed to any form of recapture of unearned land profits, but after this proposal was soundly rejected by most of the other delegations it jumped to the position being put forward by the drafting com- mittee. The amended Canadian position still falls far short of banning land speculation, leaving the decision as to what represents “appropriate recapture’ to in- dividual governments. Canadian observers at Habitat said that even though Canada had changed its position on the land issue, it probably would not be reflected in a serious curbing of land speculation. in this country. The fight now, they said, has to be a political one which will wrest control of governments away from speculation interests. FRENE GINWALA Remark called ‘presumptuous’ ‘“‘Presumptuous and ill-advised”’ was the opinion of Dr. Frene Ginwala, delegate from the African National Congress of South Africa to Habitat, regarding an- thropologist Margaret Mead’s criticism of the International Federation of Settlements for excluding South Africa from its conference. She was referring to a speech made by .the well-known an- thropologist at a dinner held for the 200 Federation delegates in which Mead stated: “To be _ bigoted against bigots is still to be bigoted. Non-governmental organizations don’t need to get, into this kind of nonsense.”’ Dr. Ginwala opposed this saying, “the isolation of the apartheid system in all spheres’ of in-. ternational activity has come about at the direct request of the people of South Africa, and this request has received the en- dorsement of the Organization of African Unity, and the over- whelming majority of the member nations of the U.N.” There are many professed liberals, she added, who-claim that they are more competent to decide what is in the interests of Black people than the Black people themselves. To suggest that the people of South Africa do not know the conditions in which they live, or are not competent to determine the strategies for their. liberation, is a compound of arrogance and racism. The African National Congress" has commended the International Federation of Settlements for its stand against the participation of South Africa. PACIFIC TRIBUNE—JUNE 11, 1976—Page 3