vision ora revolutionary artist s SBA From ‘Siqueiros’ mural in Chapultepec Palace’ FTER DAVID ALFARO Siqueiros was released from jail last year, many were surprised by the gentle tone of the canvases—land- scapes, flowers, even a couple of Christs—he had painted during his incarceration. He is known to the world as a revolutionary par excel- lence, having taken up arms against the Porforio Diaz tyranny as a youth, and later against the Franco rebellion in Spain. In addition, with Diego Ri- vera, Orozco and others, he led the “people’s art” muralist revolution which blossomed on Mexico’s walls, in the 1920s. Siqueiros.is a mdany-sided man, and gentleness is one aspect (humor is another) of his spirit, along with inex- tinguishable anger against oppression and injustice. One may guess at the kind of solace it brought him, during those four prison years, to paint what he painted. In any case, the rapid sale of the canvases to wealthy collectors for many tens of thousands of dollars as soon as they were exhibited in Mexico City must have ap- pealed to his sense of humor. He is notoriously and im- penitently Red, but not even conviction for the crime of “social dissolution” could af- fect his position as one of the top artists to “buy as an investment”. Most of the money realized from the paintings went to alleviate the lot of the eight trade union and/or Commun- ist Party leaders who were jailed with him but have not got out, and to continue the fight to free them. But Siqueiros has the en- ergy of 20 ordinary humans, and it turned out that the canvases were only a minor part of the work he did in those prison years. What we now know to have been his major activity provides a stunning example of the kind of man he is. Already in his middle six- ties, he would have been ap- proaching 80 by the end of this prison sentence, and had no idea when or if the inter- national campaign to free him’ would succeed. Yet he set himself to sketch out the biggest mural ever conceived by an artist. This apparently fantastic scheme took shape in his mind as a result of earlier talks with the Mexican ce- ment _multi-millionaire Manu- el Saurez. : .More or less as a hobby, Saurez runs the Cuernavaca resort hotel Casino de la Selva, to which he never stops making additions — a bowling alley, an Olympic- size swimming pool, a night club. Saurez proposed a conven- tion hall in the hotel grounds, to be adorned with paintings by Mexico’s most famous liv- ing artist: The fact that the hotel caters to rich tourists—main- ly North Americans — who are staunch anti-Communists did not worry Saurez. He is a Mexican first, a multi-mil- lionaire second. So Siqueiros, sitting in his narrow cell, contemplated the fact that he had agreed to make 20 paintings each con- siderably larger than the cell. Anyone else would have sent word to Saurez to forget about the whole thing. In- stead, Siqueiros worked out more than 200 sketches for murals to cover the entire walls and ceiling of Saurez’s convention hall, depicting the history of man’s struggles “from darkness into light’. The official announcement of Siqueiros’ release said he was needed to complete “a ‘work of national importance,” the Mexican Revolution mu- ral in Chapultepec Palace which was half done at the time of his arrest. When Saurez looked over the sketches for the Cuerna- vaca project, he delightedly signed a $400,000 contract for the work, and began con- struction of the convention halle é Siqueiros went back to work in Chapultepec Palace while talks began about the unprecedented technical prob- lems of the Cuernavaca job. In the midst of the discus- sions, the 69-year-old artist fell from a scaffolding. The fall put him out of action for a time, and later caused attacks of dizziness which made work on a scaffold dif- ficult or impossible. The attacks of dizziness have become less frequent, but they further complicated the technical problems of Cuernavaca. The solution was found in the construction not far from the hotel of a “mural studio” such as never existed anywhere before. The mural would be paint- ed on huge panels of asbestos cement, backed by steel strips for fixing them later to the convention hall walls. Twelve electric and mecha- nical cranes would lift the panels to any height, or sink them to any necessary depth into slots in the studio floor. Thus all the painting ex- cept for the central ceiling could be carried out at ground level. The bill for his convention hall-which for him has now become a “chapel” (Siqueiros says jokingly, “Why not a cathedral?”) is astronomical. It would probably run to $1,500,000 by the end of next year when the “chapel” will be opened to the public. The statistics of the pro- ject are such as would make a movie press agent drunk with joy. Siqueiros and his team will have put in about 60,000 man- hours, using three tons of paint and 12,600 quarts of solvent, to decorate more than 110 tons of panels which will cover 28,000 square feet. In addition, an extensive series of stained-glass win- dows will be produced as part of the grand design on the sunny side of the “chapel”. To top it off Saurez has decided to make a heliport on the “chapel” roof. Saurez put up a little ce- ment tower in the studio from which, at an appropriate dis- tance, he may inspect the progress of the work on his frequent visits. A patron out of some land of dreams, he merely inspects and does not interfere. Chain smoking from dawn to dusk (“I gave it up in ‘jail,’ he says, “so I can in- dulge myself now’) Siqueiros darts about ‘the studio with inexhaustible energy. Still he has time and pa- tience for the reports, pho- tographers and assorted art lovers and rubbernecks who flock to the studio. As a painter for the people ’ he doesn’t like to turn away anyone interested in the way. the job is done; but the visit- ors add greatly to the strain ~ of his titanic undertaking. The mural will depict specifically the history of Mexican man, but “projected universally,” as Siqueiros exX- plains, “since the develop: ment of all people is the samé although the stages are dif- ferent.” From the roots of an enor mous tree, shadowy, skeletal — figures — primitive man— move into a desolate lands- ~cape. The emerging -multi- tudes are shown in bitter struggles, some triumphant, some drowned in blood. Gradually, two steps for- ward and one step back, they move through the centuries away from hunger and terror toward dignity, and fulfilment through cooperation. For Siqueiros the work iS a grandiose climax to his dec- ades-long struggle against “escapist” art, to bring art “back to man—to the prob- lems of man in our own land _ as a symbol or concrete ex — pression of the problems 0 universal man.” He expects plenty of con- troversy with the formalist schools in Mexico and else where—and with the “Social- ist realism’ schools as well —and will welcome it all for the positive results it must have. So Siqueiros remains the — revolutionary he always wa5 —on a scale so vast, now, 49 to take the wind out of most “experts’” sails. Whatever their verdict on his “crucial work” the words of niggling criticism will not come easily: Cuernavaca, Mexico By CEDRIC BELFRAGE July 22, 1966—PACIFIC TRIBUNE—Page 4 Beas se Agee