g$ \, Ottawa discloses U.S. law ¢ A KF - ) x 1s 3 om ; if *” New ambassador praises \ U.S.-Canadian togetherness iP» s rT PAN 9m Boog — he FLASHBACKS FROM THE COMMUNIST PRESS 50 years ago... CANDIDATES FOR THE BREAD LINE Another Bunch of Suckers Landed in the Old Country for Exploitation by the Parasites of Canada pa tONTREAL — More than 1,400 + eteanies nearly all of ‘them a to Canada, passed * ae Montreal from St. John { hich. special trains, two. of ce into Windsor Street ie “ while the others swung Sa. * Sortin, a few miles out- ne ‘nl City, to continue. One of “a ia will g0 to Toronto, the hada, © points in Western Ca- considerable number of the localities are headed for various nipeg a in Canada west of Win- Other +s Settle on the land. An- Tonto Ot were booked for To- ae and communities in On- Included in Were tw, oS one fo alvat the -newcomers ion Army parties, ane t Toronto and the other for Many wen It is not known how Otential Bulpi i the party, pitts were in The Worker, March 8, 1924 25 years ago... STYX OR STYNX? RUSTICUS, REGENT, MAN:: The Saskatchewan Common- wealth recently described how Premier T. C. Douglas declined the challenge of LPP leader Nel- son Clarke to debate the Berlin situation, saying he would prefer to do so with someone who knows something about it ... “Your manuscript indicates you have no knowledge of the subject, and have apparently swallowed hook, line and sinker the propaganda handed out by the Communist press.” ‘People of unprejudiced mind are not restricted to the Commu- nist press in their approach to the situation in. Europe. The first hand evidence of such witnesses as the Dean of Canterbury, G. B. Shaw, Henry Wallace and a host _ of others should be entitled to some credence. But their opinions are never heard over the air or in the press. The whole River Styx (or is it Stynx?) of lying propaganda ema- nating from the stooges of capi- talism would be ridiculous if it weren't so tragic. Tribune, March 7, 1949 Profiteer of the week: tion. hee Pacific Tribune West Coast edition, Canadian Tru Bit of bad news this week. Simpsons Ltd., Toronto, the department store where gener- ations have parted with their savings, is standing still. Profit for the year ended Jan. 2 was $23,574,000, about the same as last year. Every year the same old $23,000,000. Hardly worthy of an award you say? But Simpsons-Sears Ltd., Toranto, a branch of the family, netted $30,275,000, some $3.6 million better than a year ago. Well, the family that Sears’ together, profiteers to- gether, and accordingly deserves recogni- Publish Editor — MAURICE RUSH ed Weekly at Ford Bldg., Mezzanine No. 3, 193 E. Hastings St., Vancouver 4, B.C. Phone 685-5288. Subseri orth 3 North and South A Bs Second class mail registration number 1560. Business & Circulation Manager, FRED WILSON tion Rate: Canada, $6.00 one year; $3.50 for six months nd South America and Commonwealth countries, $7.00 All other countries, $8.00 one year merica and Commonwealth countries, $7.00 one year Speech evades compelling needs The velvet-gloved Speech from the Throne, opening the 2nd session of Canada’s 29th Parliament, scarcely _hides the iron-fisted intent. The speech, behind all its vague- ness, its 46 proposed pieces of legisla- tion, its hypocritical nod to farmers, touched many bases, but remains as it was conceived, an anti-working-class, anti-democratic trap. The compelling need today is to do something about the swaggering mono- polies who not only exploit their work- ers through the daily theft of labor power, but rob-us all as consumers, in- terfere in government, subvert our country’s sovereignty, and stall the in- evitable development of society towards one which serves the needs of working people. The government’s. refusal to put a stop to inflation by preventing catapult- ing profits, is a declaration of further attacks on living standards. Proposed loans and advances to farmers are wel- come, if indeed they occur, but they leave the farmer at the mercy of profit- eering corporations; in short it’s a way to ensure that the farmer has the money to contribute to corporation pro- fits. These corporations should be taxed for the amount of the additional farm’ aid. Liberal dedication to monopoly is matched by the Conservatives, whose leader sails the political sea on his wage-freeze raft, oblivious of the times in which we live. The government, says the Throne Speech, “will step in, as it has done in the past . . . to protect those who are not able to protect themselves against the effects of inflation . . .” With such protection the working people had better build the machinery to protect themselves! When has the Trudeau government helped the consumer? When it allowed an inflationary 9.6% rise in prices? All that clap-trap in parliament doesn’t put food on the table; and the reason we are constantly under attack by the profiteers is because governments of Liberals and/or Tories are tools of those profiteers — however polished their speeches. Speeches from the grassroots as well as from the throne are needed. Firm action is assured by the Communist Party and must also be assured by the New Democrats, the trade unions, and scores of organizations united in their determination. to ensure that the Throne Speech concepts are fought at every turn, and legislation enacted to meet real needs. The Kissinger plan for Canada Events leading to Henry Kissinger’s scheduled Ottawa visit this month, to talk tough on energy, veer more and more toward a program of dictating Canadian policies — both domestic and foreign. Topies expected at the Ottawa meet- ing with External Affairs Minister Sharp include: Alaska crude by tanker down the British Columbia coast, Cana- dian oil shipments to USA, U.S. inclu- sion in Alberta’s tar sands development, and undoubtedly continued U.S. efforts to prevent any Canadian utilization of resources free of U.S. control. But the Kissinger plan for Canada evidently goes much deeper. “Canada is a member of NATO,” he warned, “and Canada... has to adjust to many new conditions.” His Ottawa lieutenant, Ambassador Wm. J. Porter, then carried the ball. He admired Canada’s resources and said: “.. . a substantial integration of (Canada-U.S.) effort . ... will permit equitable economic development and equitable benefit from such develop- ment.” Canada, he noted, has resources . “which can be translated into world- wide influence.” Then the continental view .... “T believe firmly that this continent ‘and those who sit astride its resources ... are going to exert tremendous in- fluence as we develop those resources. We can be exporters of energy to the world.” In exchange for managing our re- sources for us, the USA will push us ‘centre-stage as its world-wide political huckster. To amplify the U.S. stand, Maurice’ Strong, a Canadian heading the UN en- vironmental secretariat, also spouted U.S. policy. Canada, he said, “must re- gard itself not just as the sovereign owner and possessor of these advan- tages: (resources) but in the larger sense as their trustee.” However, Ambassador Porter allowed that, “If Canadians desired to partici- pate (in the ‘complicated and expensive technology necessary to exploit these resources’) they could. get in from the outset. But it’s the Canadians who have to decide what they want to do.” On that, Mr. Porter, you can bet! Canadians said it to a Gallup: Poll when 69 per cent favored, fully or in part, “significant” restrictions on fur- ther foreign investment in Canada. In fact, taking only. those with opinions (13 per cent didn’t know) the vote was closer to 80 per cent. That was just on “investment,” not crude interference. The evidence is ample warning to the Canadian government to treat serious- ly its responsibility to the Canadian people — in the: matter of resources, in the matter of independent policies — to reject the “Canada plan” of Henry Kis- singer and his Ottawa hand. a PACIFIC TRIBUNE—-FRIDAY, MARCH’S, 1974—-PAGE 3 PACIFIC TRIBUNE=—FRIDAT, MARCI zz; TW78—T ACL cuca ee