PORT CCQUITLAK BeCe
SEPT 27th 1972
TO, THE MAYOR AND. TPE CITY COUNCIL Al
C/O “2 FREEMAN, CITY CLERK
PORT COQUITLAM B.C.
OCT 2
WITH REGARDS TO TEE PROPOSED BYLAW # eos . AS YOU 2 nce! eurte

(A NUWBER OF CONCERED CITIZENS HAVE STRONG CPPCSITION 10 THIS BYLAW.
ALTHOUGH MANY QUESTIONS WERE DISCUSSED AT THE HEARING RICH WAS HELD
VONDAY S8P; 25th. IT NAS NOT PCSSIBIE TO AVAIL OURSELVES OF A LEGAL
OPINION PHICR TO THE NEARING. BUT AT THIS TING, VYSELF, AMD SONS CONcERNt
CITIZEXS ISH TO FCINT CUT TO THE MAYCR AND CITY COUNCIL , TTAT THE
‘OCESISTEFCIES AND CONTRADICTIONS IV RYLAW 1203 ARE SUCH ‘THAT VS

WILL SERIOUSLY ATIEMPT . TC HAVE IT OVERTHROWN SHCULD IT PUSHED

AS MEETS a eRe

THROUGH ARBITRARILY CY THIRD READING.

ETF aL

78 FEEL CERTAIN THAT THE BYLAW IN 17S PRESENT FORM IS NoT ACCEPTABLE

‘AND THAT IT'S ULTIMATE OBJECTIVE CAN EE ARRIVLD AT WITHCUT ITS REP RERRORAE LE

DETRIVENTAL SFFECT ON THE INDIVIDUAL LAND OWNER.

THANKING YOU

FON NEG Detect ee it
Srrenat fant tad