GEORGE JOHNSTON (left), LEN GUY. . ee . labor must rely on militant action. _ “Prepare now for work Stoppage’ - Fed parley cont'd. from pg. 1 movement — the shop stewards, the local officers, the active rank and file members — will recognize the necessity of winning this battle through a strong and united labor movement.” Delegates interviewed by the Tribune following the conclusion of the one day conference, said they welcomed the resolution to prepare now for a work stoppage. The overwhelming sentiment was ‘“‘we have a big job to do to mobilize the - entire labor movement in B.C., and we must now go out and do it.” Some delegates told the Tribune they regretted there wasn’t a bigger turnout from two of B.C.’s major unions — the IWA and-B.C. Government Employees — and that some of their leaders did not speak at the parley. Speaking at a seminar at Simon Fraser University on Monday, CLC president Joe Morris said that ‘‘the CLC has waged, and will continue to wage an unrelenting campaign of opposition ‘tagainst the federal government’s controls.” “The wage control legislation,” he said, ‘‘was the first time in times of peace that government moved to control the end result of collective bargaining. Historically government has rested content with legislating the procedures under which collective bargaining would be conducted while leaving the price of labor to be settled by the two parties — labor and management. “Although this may not appear to the outside observer to be a drastic shift in government policy, for trade unions it was striking at their very source of strength and reason for being. Not only did it strike at the fundamentals of trade DEAF PROTEST Cont'd from pg. 2 said labor should speak for the rights of people who cannot speak for themselves, the deaf. Eldridge condemned the ‘‘insensitive, inhuman and calculating manner of the minister on this issue.”’ Walt Jacobs of the Marine- workers’ Union, blasted the Socred government for its policy, and said it’s a pretty low blow when the government directs its cost-cutting against the deaf and blind. The Vancouver Labor Council resolution went on record opposing any attempt to close or reduce services at Jericho, and decided to forward its protest to the minister of education. unionism, but the procedures under the regulations also made each employer an extension of the State in enforcing the legislation, in which the national-will became the corporate-will, and the power of the state was placed at the disposal of each employer at the bargaining table.” : Major attention was also devoted at the BCFL parley to recent anti- labor legislation adopted by the Socred government.-In his speech to the delegates, secretary- treasurer Len Guy charged that the Socreds “‘are clearly out to assist their friends, big business, and punish their enemies— working people, and particularly organized workers.” Guy said that the new Bennett government seems to have learned one lesson from the old. ‘Instead of the kind of open, full scale assault on the labor movement represented by Bill 33 and Bill 88 (which was withdrawn in the face of united labor opposition), this new batch of anti-labor Socreds are obviously intending to attack us in bits and pieces of legislation, hoping that we will lay back and accept each attack as relatively minor. “Unfortunately, this strategy has been made easier, as we forecast a year ago, by the am- biguous nature of the NDP’s Labor Code. As we pointed out in our criticisms at that time, the Code was written in such a way that relatively minor amendments by a hostile government, combined with any shift in personnel which established an anti-labor majority on the Labor Relations Board, would leave us with very bad legislation. : “Clearly the Socreds have embarked on that course. And, unless we unite successfully to resist their activities, they will continue to -introduce anti-labor amendments and to change the make-up of the LRB to insure that we end up with legislation and with an all powerful LRB, both stacked against us.” Following Guy’s analysis. of recent Socred anti-labor legislation, delegates adopted a series of resolutions which: o Endorsed the federation’s opposition to Bill 16, passed by the Socred government, which would B.C., and recommended that the BCFL adopt a general policy of ignoring LRB orders to remove or restrict the “‘hot” declaration. 0 Protested the 40-day cooling off period in Section 73 (7) of the Labor Code and resolved that the: BCFL adopt a policy of giving full federation support to any affiliate deciding to ignore or resist the imposition of such back-to-work orders, o Condemned the enactment of Bill 83 which grants non-union contractors access to public construction projects. The resolution recommends _ that federation officers and the B.C. and Yukon Building Trades Council develop a program of action to fight this legislation. Rivalries harm. building trades By JACK PHILLIPS As the strike-lockout. in the construction industry moves to its fourth week, divisions between the 15 unions are unfortunately being debated in the capitalist news media. Instead of uniting against the Construction Labor Relations Association and its attempt to compel the unions to recognize the Anti-Inflation Board in a memorandum of agreement, some union leaders are fighting each other. In the Vancouver Sun of July 17, Frank Stevens of the Cement Masons accused the CLRA of making an under-the-table deal with the Electrical Workers and the Iron Workers. On July 19, the Sun quoted a spokesman for the Electrical Workers as denying the allegation. The 15 unions are in two groups. On the one hand there is the so- called mechanical trades, with eight unions, of which the Elec- tricians, Plumbers and Iron Workers are the key unions. The second group is the so-called basic - trades, with the Carpenters, Laborers and Operating Engineers as the key unions. The basic trades are pressing for an across-the-board settlement in dollars and cents, because they do - not want to see a widening of the wage gap between themselves and the mechanical trades. The mechanical trades appear to be more inclined to accept eight per cent as of May 1 (in line with AIB guidelines), with the proviso that the second instalment will be subject to a ruling by the Anti- Inflation Board. CASAW will provide for those suspended Cont'd. from pg. 1 strike, but acknowledged that ' Alcan did not come to the hearing bring public employees under the . federal wage control program and establish a provincial Anti- Inflation Board. The resolution demands that Bill 16 be rescinded. o Condemned the government’s attack on the federation’s ‘hot’ policy as constituting a threat to the whole trade union movement in PACIFIC TRIBUNE—JULY 23, 1976—Page 8 “with clean hands” since it had violated its undertaking to the board. Alean had also flaunted its duplicity on the issue of the federal guidelines when it arbitrarily raised rents in company-owned housing 10.6 percent and prices on safety clothing 20 percent while insisting on an eight percent wage settlement. In delivering its decision, the LRB warned that the Alean dispute in‘Kitimat was unique and should not be interpreted as a standard for board action in other illegal walkouts. Dismissal for leaders would be the general rule in such cases, it stated. It also noted that lengthy Suspensions in a town dominated by one large employer could have the effect of dismissal since those suspended would be virtually unable to find other work. That will not be the case for the CASAW members, however. Ac- cording to Burton, arrangements have been made to provide for Suspended members and for the union, itself, the next few months will be a time of consolidation. Throughout the strike, donations from union locals around the province have been coming in to the union office and although the dispute has settled down, money continues to come in. Only this week, a donation came. in from longshoremen at the Vanterm dock who had taken up a : collection during a lunch break. From the fund created by the various donations, interest-free loans, providing for 75 percent of the former earnings of Alcan workers, will be made available to those under suspension. President Burton intends, as do Jim Brisebois and Wiheo Pap- penbrock, to devote his energies to the union and may well be elected to the office of business-agent — the only paid officer — when he runs for the position in union elections slated for later this year. Much of their work will have to be aimed at preparing for the contempt-of-court trial scheduled for September 13. All the weight of both Alcan and the courts still hangs above their heads as they face fines against the union and possible jail terms as well as suits for damages.. Another court case, prompted by the police arrests June 10, is also before them but that case, slated for September 21, does not hold the same dangers. Despite the punitive actions that could yet be taken against them and the fact that they were ultimately forced to return to work, the Alean workers have not revealed any feelings of defeat. And the bitterness against the AIB inspired contract lingers. “There’s no sense of defeat among the members,”’ Burton told the Tribune. ‘‘And even if they were forced back on the job by the police, the Labor Relations Board and the courts, ithasn’t made them any happier about the contract.” ‘other than in uniting for a 0 . Eagle, to be followed by a trial ° There is good reason to beli€l that the leadership of the Canadié ' Labor Congress will soon set # preparatory committees for ! general strike against wag! controls. In this situation, to alld a written reference to the AIB™ the memorandum of settlemell would be, tantamount to UW dermining the CLC position of ue recognizing Bill C-73 in any Walp), shape or form. uf t Instead of playing oneupmanslil with each other, as some leadeh s, seem to be doing, no effort shoul te be spared to find a con bargaining position. Coupled be J this there should be principh |, opposition to any reference to™ AIB. Those leaders who are able™) see beyond the narrow, craft # terests of their respective uml! should work to end a situation") which two groups appear to” 4 th more concerned with fighting @ settlement for all unions. When unions become involved ly petty squabbling, the major jectives of the labor movement é lost sight of. The inter-unil! competition to get a few penn more becomes more imporlé™ than the over-all interests of ™ working class. In the long 1 ] ‘these tactics are disastrous for @ trade union movement, includiy those unions who momentalllj, gain a few pennies. It would appear that a provincial government has deci@¥ a not to impose a Council of Unidl i on the building trades at this tim’) The major construction companl& are not asking them to do so. 7! : government therefore has no ly tention of inviting a confrontali]) with organized labor, at tly moment in time. a However, if the strike-lock0l continues, and if the unions # unable to resolve their differenc® we can expect the government © intervene on behalf of the ely ployers, in some fashion. intervention will be careful timed. This strike-lockout has created the early politic® pressures that would be the cas@™ a strike of hospital or fel) workers. | It would be much better if H unions would unite around ! common program and negotiate # settlement without governmel intervention, and without ul! dermining labor’s fight against th) AIB. PELTIER cont'd. from pg. 1 Rapid City, South Dakota. F The other member is Leona! Peltier who is awaiting the oul come of both his legal appeal of th® warrant of committal {0 surrender following his extraditio hearing, and his appeal to thé minister of justice for politic#! asylum in Canada. The Committee charged that separation of Eagle from the tri@ of Butler and Robideau is aimed # ‘and holding a separate trial f? Peltier if he is extradited. In th® way, says the Vancouver-bas Committee, the U.S. prosecuto hope to finally pin the blame oP AIM-members Eagle and Peltie!’ “The prime target is Leonafé Peltier,’’ says the Committ : which points out that the campaig” to gain freedom for Peltier is & panding across Canada. ; PP gee TL Fea Fe f E f I | | they ( f }