COPE mayoralty candidate Bruce Yorke ta Petition opposing bus fare increases to B.C. Hydro o With Yorke and Gordon are other COPE candidates (from left to right) Mike Wallach, Joe Arnaud, Debra Lewis and Paul Murphy. —Sean Griffin photo Fare increase protested cont'd from pg. 1 Wages were held to within the anti- Inflation guideline of an eight per Cent increase yet fares were going Up 40 per cent. Yorke was also critical of the fact that Bonner was not present to Teceive the petitions. ‘He has 4ssured us in writing that he will Meet with a delegation from COPE to discuss the fare increases, yet TRIDENT | cont'd from pg. 1 Providing a deterrent was not Mvolved at all as the Trident base Was not defensive but was a ‘“‘first- Strike installation.” He likened the Situation to that of the Vietnam War when thelabor movement took 4 Stand demanding that Canadian Complicity in the U.S. war be en- ded. As with the Trident base, Canadian involvement in Vietnam Was primarily in the construction and sale of materials to the U.S. defence department. It was learned some weeks ago that Heede International had Obtained the Trident contract, Valued at $3.8 million, with the rect assistance of a_ federal town corporation, the Canadian Ommercial Corporation, which ad negotiated on Heede’s behalf With the defence department. Since ‘at information was made public, €ede’s Port Moody plant has been he target of a number of picket lines and leaflet distributions, Mcluding one last month by Members of the Japan Council Against Atomic and Hydrogen €apons who were in Vancouver On part of a North American tour. The campaign by the labor ™ovement to end Canadian in- Volvement and profiteering from he Trident base would not end With Trudeau’s letter Baker said. We're going to be keeping the Pressure on as best we can, and I Would hope to see the whole labor Movement take up this question.” Baker said that he had written to ‘New Westminster MP Stuart €ggatt, who has been an out- Spoken opponent of the Trident base, and NDP national leader Ed Toadbent asking them to pursue he matter with Trudeau. He said lat he had enclosed copies of Tudeau’s letter to both. “As well,’’ Baker said, ‘‘copies of °ur correspondence with Trudeau €ave been sent to both the B.C. €deration of Labor and the Canadian Labor Congress and this Question of Canadian involvement ™ the Trident submarine project Will be raised on the floor of the C. Federation of Labor con- Yention later this month.” we have requested such ... a meeting on five separate occasions and he still has not met us,”’ Yorke said. ‘We still want that meeting and we still have a lot to say on this matter.” Another COPE aldermanic candidate, Bruce Eriksen, vice- president of the Downtown Eastside Residents Association, said that the fare increase is just “the thin edge of the blade. They’ve raised fares 40 per cent now, and in a another couple of months they’ll raise them another 40 or 50 per cent. “Tm positive that fares will be up around 65 cents by next summer unless we hold the line on them now. You wait and see what this city will be like next summer. Already the streets are clogged with traffic and they'll bea hell of a sight worse when the bus fares go up.”’ Eriksen said that the people he most frequently works with, the residents of the city’s downtown eastside, ‘“‘just do not have the money to pay more to ride the buses. This increase is just com- pounding what is already hap- pening to these people as they find that there are no controls on their rents or food costs, but certainly on their incomes. I guess there are no controls on government corpora- tions either.” COPE has also called for the immediate convening of a public hearing which would require Hydro to ‘‘show cause why any increase at all infares’’ be allowed and said that an important part of that hearing would be the right of citizens’ delegations to appear and be heard. ; The COPE campaign against the fare increases will continue, and the civic party expects it become a major issue in the November 17 elections. Part of the campaign will be putting forward a number of alternatives to Vancouver’s present, inadequate transit system, including the extension of Park and Ride systems, and a petition campaign designed to bring pressure upon all levels of government to begin immediately planning for a “‘fast, efficient, and cheap light rapid transit system for the city of Vancouver and immediate environs.” ‘councils, Students at the University of B.C. are conducting a letter campaign directed at education minister Pat McGeer in an effort to ‘Stave off probable tuition fee in- creases for next year. So far more than 3,000 UBC students have mailed in letters protesting any fee increase to the Alma Mater Society, and student organizers say that they expect the total to exceed 7,000 by the end of this week. The campaign was launched in response to a letter from McGeer which was mailed to all. College councils around the province as well as the Univer- sities Council of B.C, In his letter, McGeer warned the which are the ad- ministrative bodies of the province’s community colleges, that the provincial government would probably be unable to in- crease its operating grants to the colleges for the upcoming year, and advised colleges to examine ways of cutting costs and generating additional revenue. Another point the education minister made was that his department was not allowing for any increase in wages and salaries in formulating this policy. B.C. Student Federation in- formation officer Karen Bryson told the Tribune that the result of the department of education’s decision would ‘‘definitely be a fee increase for college students at least, and most probably university students as well.’’ Bryson also pointed out that McGeer’s letter was written after he had assured the BCSF ‘that he would not encourage college ad- ministrations to increase tuition fees, and would not interfere in the setting of fees for next year. “But that is precisely what he is doing when he advises the colleges to find additional sources of revenue or increase the produc- tivity of the faculty, simply ‘because there are no other sources of revenue for the colleges and the faculty are already. overextended as it is. All his letter does is to advise the colleges that they will haveto increase fees because there ‘ Students oppose m tuition fee hike will be no extra money next year.” David Theessen, president of the Alma Mater Society at UBC, said that the campaign at that campus is “‘primarily educational at this time. We won’t know what the extent of any fee increase will be until the Board of Governors meets next March to make that decision, but we want to. acquaint students with the issue now o that they will be able to express their opposition before the fact and hopefully stop it rather than wait for the fees to increase and then respond.”’ Theessen said that the battle to holdthe line on tuition fees will be a major aspect in next week’s National Student Day, set for November 9. National Student Day is a project of the National Union of Students across the country and will focus on the accessibility of post-secondary education, in- cluding the question of tuition fees. The letter which UBC students are mailing to McGeer urges him to ‘‘ensure that the university is given a satisfactory increase in operating funds for the coming year”’ and points out that already the students at UBC are feeling the effects of educational cutbacks in the 1976-77 university budget. The students also remind McGeer that any substantial in- crease in tuition fees will make the cost of university prohibitive, particularly in view of the high unemployment rate among students in B.C., and restrictions which have been placed upon student financial aid, both of which are compounded by other costs including the highest food costs in Canada, and spiralling rents. The letter continues: ‘... unless the university is granted adequate funds by the provincial government, the university will be forced to increase tuition fees next year. Whether this increase is many hundreds of dollars or none atallrestswithyou .. .I urge you to take the view that tuition fees represent a personal commitment on the part of the student, and not a principal source of revenue for the university.” Demand pressed to transport ministry we ‘Renew subsidy to Northland’ Northland Navigation made what will probably be its final voyage up the B.C. coast this week, ending a service to remote coastal communities that goes back to 1912 but which now will be cut off for -want of a federal subsidy. Northland, which has provided mail cargo and passenger service to such communities as Bella Bella, Kincolth, Alice Arm, Klemtu and Massett since 1959, had operated on a subsidy from the federal government but its request for a $4.5 million subsidy to con- tinue the service through 1977 was rejected by transport minister Otto Lang. Last minute negotiations to provide continued service on a limited basis were unsuccessful as Northland said it could not accept proposals that it operate only one vessel out of Prince Rupert for five months on a day-to-day subsidy. The company has already sold one of its three vessels and laid off 150 employees. In making the initial an- nouncement that the subsidy would be withdrawn, Lang stated that the decision was made only after consultation with the provincial government and local shipping companies and insisted that ser- vice to remote communitees would not be reduced since non- subsidized firms would be in a better competitive position. Both statements evoked anger from trade unionists through the province who stressed that any communities would be left stranded while many people who depend on the service for em- ployment would be left jobless. The Pacific Coast Maritime Council, made up of unions in the maritime industries, responded in a brief to Lang’s insistence that consultation had been carried out, noting that Lang had not consulted with those most concerned — ‘‘the people of the communities, the unions whose members are working in the service and Nor- thland itself. “Our council estimates that in all, 300 workers directly engaged in servicing those communities will lose their jobs . . . We cannot but insist that the subsidy to Northland be maintained until such time as volume. of traffic warrants reconsideration,’’ the council’s brief declared. The demand for the continued subsidy was echoed by delegates to the Vancouver and District Labor Council this week who reiterated an earlier call for a maintenance of the subsidy ‘‘until up-to-date vessels can be built and operated by the federal government.” Delegates coupled the resolution with endorsement of CBRT delegate Tom McGrath’s motion that the government remove transport minister Otto Lang for “his ignorance and arrogance and lack of concern for the people of the B.C. coast.” McGrath, president of the Seamen’s local of the CBRT many of whose members are directly affected by the discontinuation of Northland’s service, was also critical of the transport minister for suggestions that alternative service would be provided by other companies. “For example, what about the mail. service?’’ McGrath demanded. ‘“‘The government hasn’t said a damn thing about the mail service to those com- munities.” The provision of alternative service is of central concern to residents in the many communities scattered along the coastline, most of which have no road access. Statements made by RivTow, the major coastal towing company, indicated that it would move in to provide freight service but the prospects are dubious. ““Many of these communities are small and the volume of cargo, passenger and mail service is small. We are certain no private firm can or will service these communities without a subsidy,” the Pacific Coast Maritime Council said of RivTow’s statements. “What it comes down to is this,” the council declared. ‘‘There is no ~ alternative service. These com- munities must continue to be serviced by the kind of service now provided by Northland and that service will have to be subsidized. “They must not be left to the mercy of air, truck or shipping companies whose only concern is profit. PACIFIC TRIBUNE—NOVEMBER 5, 1976—Page 3