WOMAN'S VIEWPOINT Has woman right to bear child by A.D? AS if there: aren’t enough troubles in the’ world, Britons are in a dither over the “sin” of artificial insem- ination. This process of receiving the semen of a male in the, lab- oratory and injecting it into the female, has been in use for some years now. It has enabled many couples to have children who otherwise could not, because of the busband’s sterility, Many single, self-supporting women who want a full life have made use of artificial in- semination so that they may have a child of their own. The male donor is almost always anonymous and is not even seen by the woman. There is nothing in the least improper or indecorous about it. But now there is a great furore in Britain over this simple act. A lot of highly emotional speeches are being made and the question may €ven come up in parliament in the form, of revising the _ divorce laws so that artificial insemination without the con- sent of the husband would legally become adultery. 5s x 5 In considering this prob- lem, one surprising fact im- mediately comes to mind: the woman who has a baby out of wedlock (but by a man in the. normal way) is not blamed nearly so much as the woman who obtains a child by artificial insemination. What is the root of this attituude? Is it the subcon- scious fear of men that the time may come when the male may no longer be indispen- sable to the propagation of the race? This is not so fantastic as it seems. Some primitive forms of life consist of females only. ‘Some, like the silkworm moth, can be caused to breed with- out males. It has even been claimed that virgin rabbits have been made to produce young. Such a thing is un-Christian, pagan, say church leaders. On the contrary: the producing of life under laboratory con- ditions is one of the greatest miracles of all, and ought only to increase the faith of the truly religious. “Human beings are not cattle, to be bred by test tube,” one “Catholic social worker is quoted as Says. “A child who never father and never father’s care faces tragedy.” knows its has its hideous This completely misses the point. The fact is that only a woman who wants a child very much will seek out this unconventional way of obtain- ing one. : These babies are not “bred’’ for scientific experiments; they are deliberately sought for by women who probably make fine mothers because they went to some trouble to achieve motherhood. xt os og The issue is this: every woman has a right to bear children and a right not to bear them, and one right is as important as the other. Since the Second World War, the proportion of females to males is far -out of balance in many countries. Many girls now in their twen- ties and thirties will never marry, simply because there are not enough men to go around. Many of these would make much better mothers than the wives who flounder into motherhood through careless ness or ignorance. . Is a woman to be doomed to childlessness because no man has given her his name? oH I can readily understand how a_ self-respecting un- married woman would prefer the impersonal impregnation at the doctor’s to the more traditional casual affair with a man. Artifical insemination is not going to replace human love. It will probably never account for more than a very small ‘proportion of births. But it has a definite place among the discoveries that have brought happiness into the world. It should not be legislated into illegality. These “test tube” babies are not frauds, as the Archbishop of Canterbury implied. They are as real human beings as any others. In the name of compassion and rationality, let’s give them and their mothers the privacy we all want for ourselves. may ruin ancient H’S a married woman the right to conceive and bear a child by artificial insemin- ation or is she guilty of adul- tery? This is the question which has been under debate in the House of Lords, many of whose members are agitated by the thought of what such scientific grafting might do to their family tress, “Are we to understand you to say that a peerage ought to descend by A.I.D. (artificial insemination), if the question arose?” Viscount Samuel ask- ed Lord Chorley after that Labor peer had suggested Short short story _ AMY CLARKE. — “c Labor mustn’t be greedy!” Lords fear scientific grafting that the interest munity could by treating te “as legitimate mothers and re it descendeg in t S of the com- best be served st-tube children offspring of the husbands,” Ways it has descended in the’ past,” re- torted Lord Chorley, Significantly, a ruling handed down b Wheatley in Scottish Session has perturbed some of Britain’s beers far more than Scientists’ warnings about the higher incidence of defective births causeq by increased radiation from continued H- tests, divorce y Lord Court of Lord Wheatley ruled that a woman who gave birth to a child conceiveg by artificial insemination Without her hus- band’s consent had not com- mitted adultery. Lord Blackford argued that the Scottish court was con- cerned only with the “age-old conception of sexual inter- course.” If artificial insemination was not fecundation from out- side, what was it? In h his opin- ion it was tantamount to adultery. The Archbishop of York said he did not think artificial 3 family tree “morally, it did . of a third is as contrat be insemination shoud fined as adultery 4? criminal offense a not h ? ex’ the features of adult ft was concerned prince gy resisting. the ide@ ith should be brought vit terms of decent ful i i the marriage contra j + “The intrusion of } | § proper meaning of ‘at riage bond as is the ™ 4) of the illicit affair OF a third,” he asserted: : “The march of & ¢ against the weight ? expressed today and of opinion is against the Pip to try to put down *, 3 one way or anothel Lord Chorley. “In the view of veld y enlightened, forward" 7 sincere people, A.I.D. @ gy tremendous amount 1” suffering, misery 42°, tration among a Sie oy not unimportant nu” people.” : : 7 Concluding the deba®, Q lord chancellor ann? U) that the government a appoint a small comm conduct an inquiry 2% down recommendation It is estimated th@! are some 5,000 test dren in Britain.